No abstract

No abstract

A number of studies of explanted metallic femoral heads have shown scratches or damage caused by bone cement, bone or metallic particles. This damage has been cited as a cause of increased wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) acetabular cups. In this laboratory study, small scratches 2 mu m deep were made on smooth stainless steel surfaces at a spacing of 10 mm. These individual scratches were found to increase the wear rate of UHMWPE by a factor of 30 in unidirectional sliding and a factor of 70 in reciprocating motion. It is of particular concern that a single small scratch, which is not detected by the average surface roughness measurement Ra can cause such a dramatic increase in the wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene.

There is now considerable interest in metal-on-metal bearings for hip prostheses. Extremely low wear rates (0.1 mm3/10(6) cycles) have been reported in some simulator studies, while in vivo studies, although still very low, have shown wear rates of the order of 1 mm3/10(6) cycles. The aim of this study was to compare wear rates of metal-on-metal bearings in two hip simulators with different kinematic inputs. In the simulator with three independent input motions which produced an open elliptical wear path with a low level of eccentricity, the wear rates were very low as recorded previously in other simulators. In the simulator with two input motions which produced an open elliptical wear path with greater eccentricity the wear rate was at least ten times higher and closer to clinical values. The motion and kinematic conditions in the contact are critical determinants of wear in metal-on-metal bearings.

BackgroundSpinal systems that are currently available for correction of spinal deformities or degeneration such as lumbar spondylolisthesis or degenerative disc disease use components manufactured from stainless steel or titanium and typically comprise two spinal rods with associated connection devices (for example: DePuy Spines Titanium Moss Miami Spinal System). The Memory Metal Spinal System of this study consists of a single square spinal rod made of a nickel titanium alloy (Nitinol) used in conjunction with connecting transverse bridges and pedicle screws made of Ti-alloy. Nitinol is best known for its shape memory effect, but is also characterized by its higher flexibility when compared to either stainless steel or titanium. A higher fusion rate with less degeneration of adjacent segments may result because of the elastic properties of the memory metal. In addition, the use of a single, unilateral rod may be of great value for a TLIF procedure. Our objective is to evaluate the mechanical properties of the new Memory Metal Spinal System compared to the Titanium Moss Miami Spinal System.MethodsAn in-vitro mechanical evaluation of the lumbar Memory Metal Spinal System was conducted. The test protocol followed ASTM Standard F1717-96, “Standard Test Methods for Static and Fatigue for Spinal Implant Constructs in a Corpectomy Model.”1. Static axial testing in a load to failure mode in compression bending,2. Static testing in a load to failure mode in torsion,3. Cyclical testing to estimate the maximum run out load value at 5.0 x 10^6 cycles.ResultsIn the biomechanical testing for static axial compression bending there was no statistical difference between the 2% yield strength and the stiffness of the two types of spinal constructs.In axial compression bending fatigue testing, the Memory Metal Spinal System construct showed a 50% increase in fatigue life compared to the Titanium Moss Miami Spinal System.In static torsional testing the Memory Metal Spinal System constructs showed an average 220% increase in torsional yield strength, and an average 30% increase in torsional stiffness.ConclusionsThe in-vitro mechanical evaluation of the lumbar Memory Metal Spinal System showed good results when compared to a currently available spinal implant system. Throughout testing, the Memory Metal Spinal System showed no failures in static and dynamic fatigue.