Germ cells in female mammals become committed to meiosis and enter its prophase sequentially in fetal life and, according to the Production Line Hypothesis, the oocytes thus generated are released after puberty as mature ova in the same sequence as that of meiotic entry in fetu. This hypothesis in its original and complete form has a subordinate proposition that concerns chiasma (Xma) frequency; it postulates that Xma number would decrease with fetal age. Consequently, univalents would increase, leading to errors of chromosome disjunction at the first meiotic division (MI), and thus to maternal age-dependent numerical chromosome anomalies. By using an in vitro/in vivo approach, we radioactively labelled the DNA of germ cells at premeiotic synthesis as they sequentially entered meiosis, while the fetal ovaries were in culture. At the end of this in vitro phase, pachytene/diplotene (P/D) stages were studied to determine their labelled fraction. The ovaries were then transplanted to spayed females and, after the in vivo phase, mature ova were harvested and the proportion of labelled first and second meiotic metaphases (MI/MII) determined. By marking the germ cells with label while in vitro during periods equivalent to early and late gestation, and by comparing the observed proportions of labelled MI/MII with those of oocytes labelled at P/D, we concluded that, in the mouse, ova do not mature at random for release, but are formed according to a production line system in which the time of release after puberty is related to the time of entry into meiosis in fetu.
Chiasmata were counted and paired and unpaired configurations at first meiotic division and chromosome errors at second meiotic division were assessed at different ages in males and females of two strains of laboratory mice. In the females a decrease of chiasma frequency and an increase of univalents at first meiotic metaphase (MI) were confirmed. In the males, diakineses had higher chiasma frequencies (in the range of the female Mis) and fewer univalents than the MIs had. In these male cells there was no decrease of chiasmata or increase of autosomal univalents with age, and there were some interstrain differences. In the older females there was no parallelism between the frequencies of univalents at MI and the chromosome errors that could be identified at second meiotic division; these were fewer than might be expected on the assumption that all the univalents were true univalents. The relevance of this finding to the question of the nature of most of the univalents observed at first meiotic division in aged female mice is discussed.
In this paper observations are summarized and speculations discussed, and it is suggested that some loci on the distal short arm of the X chromosome (Xp) are not randomly inactivated in the female, because they are within the proximal part of the pairing segment between Xp and Yp. This peculiarity of gene expression may be a remnant of the evolutionary history of the sex chromosomes, the pairing segment of which may involve at least 27% of Xp and 95% of Yp. Crossing over seems to occur mostly in the terminal third of the X/Y pairing segment. However, crossing-over inhibition control may lapse, or may be somewhat variable, within the pairing segment, so that some loci on the X and Y (e.g. Xg. H-Y, STS, and perhaps others) might cross over with a variable frequency which is proportional to their distances from the telomeres of the short arms. It is postulated that the DNA of the pairing segment is composed in a way which may also permit unequal crossing over to occur between the X and the Y, thereby giving rise to exceptions to X-or Y-linked inheritance. The peculiarities of behaviour and the position of other loci on the sex chromosomes are also discussed briefly.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.