1972
DOI: 10.1007/bf00336793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Centromere localization at meiosis and the position of chiasmata in the male and female mouse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
3

Year Published

1973
1973
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
3
31
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in chiasma frequency and distribution are known to exist between the sexes in some eutherian mammals (Polani, 1972) and lower vertebrates (Callan and Perry, 1977). However, it would be remarkable if the situation in females of the species considered here was the reverse of that described in the males, so that the level of recombination of the species as a whole and their life history components were not correlated.…”
Section: The Recombination Datamentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Differences in chiasma frequency and distribution are known to exist between the sexes in some eutherian mammals (Polani, 1972) and lower vertebrates (Callan and Perry, 1977). However, it would be remarkable if the situation in females of the species considered here was the reverse of that described in the males, so that the level of recombination of the species as a whole and their life history components were not correlated.…”
Section: The Recombination Datamentioning
confidence: 78%
“…
Much has been known about the C-banding patterns of somatic and meiotic chromosomes in both animals and plants (Polani 1972, Forej t 1973, Dret and Stoll 1974, Marks 1974, Schmid and Krone 1976 , but a question has remained as to whether, or not, the same patterns appear constantly at the particular region of the chromosomes in various types of somatic and meiotic cells. In many reported cases, some difficulties occur for the identification of meiotic chromosomes.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reverse argument could be set out if the interference increase was a direct effect of the fusion; however, the fact that spontaneous, newly arisen centric fusions (i.e. without previous selective history) never attain the degree of various fusion metacentrics of Dichroplus pratensis described by Bidau (1984Bidau ( , 1990) -leads us to favour the hypothesis of i increasing as a result of adaptation to the polymorphic state (Southern, 1967b;Polani, 1972;Peters, 1982;Teoh & Young, 1983;Lopez Fernandez eta!., 1 984;Vilardi, 1 984;Colombo, 1987;Remis, 1990). Bidau (1990) argues that this body of evidence is insufficient, because these cases are 'a scanty amount indeed' of all fusions that occur spontaneously in (-3 + 6) 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 2 13 14 15 16 17 Chromosome (Or chromosome arm) length as a percentage of total autosomal length Fig.…”
Section: Interference Distancementioning
confidence: 94%