Summary 1The invasion of Betula spp. represents the moment of transition between European lowland heath and scrub ecosystems. We hypothesized that Betula invasion was controlled by a multivariate threshold, comprising factors that may be subdivided into seed and safe-site limitations, and that phosphorus availability was a key determinant of the Betula safe-site. 2 We performed a multifactorial field experiment in which seed rain, P-availability and disturbance were manipulated. All treatments had significant effects on Betula seedling densities, with seed availability proving the single greatest limitation. P addition emerged as having highly significant effects 4 and 12 months after germination. Disturbance had an initially large positive effect that dwindled across time. 3 Detailed descriptions of seedling density data were achieved by converting two factorial variables (seed rain and P availability) to a continuous form, including numerous covariates, and producing 'minimum adequate' generalized linear models (MAMs). These provided accurate descriptions of the data (explained deviance typically > 70%) and delimited site conditions where transition was likely. 4 Seed availability remained the most important factor, but the increased number of parameters in models describing densities of more mature seedlings suggested a temporal accumulation of recruitment limitations. Statistical modelling allowed for the subdivision of disturbance effects into those associated with a reduction in vegetation densities and the remaining 'direct' effects, e.g. soil disturbance, which shifted over time from being positive to negative. The results also support the hypothesis that soil phosphorus sorption capacity (PSC) determines heath-scrub transition as many of the identified determinants are controlled, either directly or indirectly, by PSC. 5 The study demonstrates that a combination of experimental and statistical modelling approaches can provide a detailed description of the factors controlling early stage invasion and may therefore have considerable utility in ecosystem management. Although site specific, the models illuminate the mechanisms by which many larger scale processes, e.g. burning and grazing, regulate the persistence of lowland heath ecosystems.
We describe six experiments set up at four regional locations in Great Britain, in 1993 and1994, to examine the impact of control treatments on bracken and associated vegetation. Present discussion is limited to the effects of treatments on bracken frond variables (density, length and dry mass). These variables would be used by a land manager to judge the extent of infestation and the efficacy of control methods. Results of statistical analyses are reported for the period 1994 to 1998, inclusive. The treatments showed great variability in effectiveness between both sites and years. Great inter-regional differences were seen, but stands at sites within a short distance of each other also varied in their response to treatment. Meso-and micro-climatic differences are suggested as possible causes, together with stand growth phase and genetic effects. The most effective treatments in the short-term were found to be combinations of cutting and herbicide spraying, applied once. Annual cutting usually gave a better result in the longer term. All treatments had greatly improved effects when combined with a follow-up application of herbicide several years after commencement. A number of recommendations are given for management, such as best methods for short-and long-term results. Systematic monitoring is urged as changes in frond density, for example, may reveal the extent of the problem for control at a particular site.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.