No abstract

Acute mesenteric ischemia is defined as an inadequate blood supply to the gastrointestinal tract resulting in ischemic and inflammatory injury that may progress to necrosis of the bowel wall. Prognosis is poor with a mortality rate greater than 95% without treatment, dropping to around 70% when surgical treatment is performed. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) has become the cornerstone of the diagnosis by showing features of vascular disorders (occlusion and/or insufficient blood supply) and features of intestinal ischemic injury. CT should be performed as rapidly as possible. Imaging-based patient management is required, and multimodal and multidisciplinary management should be introduced. The treatment involves multidisciplinary management by gastroenterologists, vascular and digestive surgeons, cardiologists, intensivists, and diagnostic and interventional radiologists. Based on our experience at a dedicated mesenteric stroke center, this article gives an overview of the diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia. The goal of this review is to improve the understanding of the imaging-based diagnosis to further improve the management of this life-threatening condition.

Early diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) remains a clinical challenge, and no biomarker has been consistently validated. We aimed to assess the accuracy of three promising circulating biomarkers for diagnosing AMI—citrulline, intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP), and d-lactate. A cross-sectional diagnostic study enrolled AMI patients admitted to the intestinal stroke center and controls with acute abdominal pain of another origin. We included 129 patients—50 AMI and 79 controls. Plasma citrulline concentrations were significantly lower in AMI patients compared to the controls [15.3 μmol/L (12.0–26.0) vs. 23.3 μmol/L (18.3–29.8), p = 0.001]. However, the area under the receiver operating curves (AUROC) for the diagnosis of AMI by Citrulline was low: 0.68 (95% confidence interval = 0.58–0.78). No statistical difference was found in plasma I-FABP and plasma d-lactate concentrations between the AMI and control groups, with an AUROC of 0.44, and 0.40, respectively. In this large cross-sectional study, citrulline, I-FABP, and d-lactate failed to differentiate patients with AMI from patients with acute abdominal pain of another origin. Further research should focus on the discovery of new biomarkers.

No abstract

Eastern and Western guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are known to significantly differ on many points, because they reflect different diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to this cancer. Importantly, these guidelines are primarily consensus-driven when it comes to surveillance, both in term of the tests used and surveillance program design. The main difference between East and West lies in clinical practice, as several Eastern countries implement coordinated and systematic surveillance programs, while most Western countries rely on individual adherence to surveillance recommendations. This review article presents an overview of the evidence supporting surveillance programs for HCC, with a particular focus on the efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and consequences of this approach for patient survival. Western and Eastern guideline recommendations are discussed.

No abstract

No abstract

Imaging and pathology have become central to the management of patients, from diagnosis to treatment. These two disciplines are complementary in providing multiscale and multiparametric characterization of tissues and organs of interest. Image interpretation is at the centre of both and relies on medical expertise, so much so that both can be considered as two sides of the same diagnostic coin. Yet, they don't have the same place in patient management: while imaging is now of utmost importance in the diagnostic process, pathology is almost always needed when a final diagnosis is to be reached. Consequently, two things are deeply engraved in the mind of radiologists, as it is in that of clinicians: first, that pathology has something to do with the ground truth, and second, that radiologists consider it as a reference method to which they must compare their performance. Pathology has to do with the ontology of medicine (what is and what is not), and with its epistemology (what's true and what's not). Modern medicine is not the daughter of the anatomoclinical method of Laennec, Charcot, and Bichat for nothing.