Background and Purpose: Oropharyngeal dysphagia is a common manifestation in acute stroke. Aspiration resulting from difficulties in swallowing is a symptom that should be considered due to the frequent occurrence of aspiration pneumonia that could influence the patient’s recovery as it causes clinical complications and could even lead to the patient’s death. The early clinical evaluation of swallowing disorders can help define approaches and avoid oral feeding, which may be detrimental to the patient. This study aimed to create an algorithm to identify patients at risk of developing dysphagia following acute ischemic stroke in order to be able to decide on the safest way of feeding and minimize the complications of stroke using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NHISS). Methods: Clinical assessment of swallowing was performed in 50 patients admitted to the emergency unit of the University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil, with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke, within 48 h after the beginning of symptoms. Patients, 25 females and 25 males with a mean age of 64.90 years (range 26–91 years), were evaluated consecutively. An anamnesis was taken before the patient’s participation in the study in order to exclude a prior history of deglutition difficulties. For the functional assessment of swallowing, three food consistencies were used, i.e. pasty, liquid and solid. After clinical evaluation, we concluded whether there was dysphagia. For statistical analysis we used the Fisher exact test, verifying the association between the variables. To assess whether the NIHSS score characterizes a risk factor for dysphagia, a receiver operational characteristics curve was constructed to obtain characteristics for sensitivity and specificity. Results: Dysphagia was present in 32% of the patients. The clinical evaluation is a reliable method of detection of swallowing difficulties. However, the predictors of risk for the swallowing function must be balanced, and the level of consciousness and the presence of preexisting comorbidities should be considered. Gender, age and cerebral hemisphere involved were not significantly associated with the presence of dysphagia. NIHSS, Glasgow Coma Scale, and speech and language changes had a statistically significant predictive value for the presence of dysphagia. Conclusions: The NIHSS is highly sensitive (88%) and specific (85%) in detecting dysphagia; a score of 12 may be considered as the cutoff value. The creation of an algorithm to detect dysphagia in acute ischemic stroke appears to be useful in selecting the optimal feeding route while awaiting a specialized evaluation.
This study aimed to verify if older patients admitted to a tertiary care geriatric ward with no spontaneous complaints of dysphagia have impaired swallowing function as detected by a specialized clinical assessment and a scintigraphic study of swallowing. Thirty patients (mean age = 76.2 years, 17 women), consecutively admitted for the treatment of acute or chronic diseases, were studied. Two control groups were also studied, one consisting of 10 healthy older persons (mean age = 69.6 years, 5 women) and the other consisting of 20 young volunteers (mean age = 25.4 years, 11 women). A complete clinical assessment of swallowing was performed by a speech pathologist. Each subject was also submitted to scintigraphic studies of oropharyngeal transit after swallowing liquid and syrup boluses labeled with 99m technetium phytate. Transit time, clearance time, and residuals were measured. Five patients had impairments in swallowing function detected by clinical assessment, three of them in the absence of complaints even after specific questioning. Scintigraphic transit times did not differ between the groups studied; however, residuals after syrup swallows were greater in the patient group compared with the healthy older volunteers. These findings suggest an increased risk for aspiration and the usefulness of a brief assessment of swallowing function in all patients admitted to tertiary care geriatric wards.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.