Bu çalışmanın amacı, üniversite öğrencilerinin kariyerlerini planlama süreçlerinde, kariyer geleceği algısı ile algılanan kariyer engellerinin etkisini incelemektir. "Kariyer Planlama Ölçeği", "Kariyer Geleceği Ölçeği" ve "Algılanan Kariyer Engelleri Ölçeği", 123'ü kadın ve 103'ü erkek olmak üzere, toplam 226 üniversite öğrencisine uygulanmıştır. Analiz sonuçları, farklı düzeyde kariyer planlama davranışı sergileyen katılımcıların, kariyer geleceği algı düzeyleri ve algıladıkları kariyer engelleri bakımından farklılaştıklarını göstermiştir. Hiyerarşik regresyon analizi sonuçlarına göre de kariyer planlama ve alt boyutlarının, "kariyer geleceği ölçeği alt boyutları", "mesleğin geleceği ve çalışma koşullarının zorluğu" ile "aile ve çevre etkisi" kariyer engelleri alt ölçeklerince pozitif olarak; "mesleğin geleceği ve iş piyasası kısıtlamaları" ile "motivasyon eksikliği ve yetersiz hazırlanma" kariyer engelleri alt ölçekleri tarafından da negatif olarak yordandığı bulunmuştur.Anahtar Sözcükler: Kariyer, Kariyer Planlama, Kariyer Geleceği Algısı, Algılanan Kariyer Engelleri, Üniversite Öğrencileri The Role of Career Barriers and Career Future Perceptions in the Career Planning Process AbstractThe aim of this study was to examine the effect of career futures and perceived career barriers in the university students' career planning processes. "Career Planning Scale", "The Career Futures Inventory" and "Perceived Career Barriers Scale" were administered to 226 (123 female, 103 male) university students. The results showed that there were some differences between the participants who exhibited career planning behaviors at different levels in terms of perceived career barriers and perception of career futures. Also, the results of hierarchical regression analysis revealed that career planning subscales were positively predicted by the "career futures subscales", "the future of the profession and the difficulty of working conditions" and "family and environmental effect". Moreover, career planning subscales were negatively predicted by "the future of the profession and labour market constraints" and "lack of motivation, and inadequate preparation".
ÖzetSiyasete ilgi göstermek, bu hususta duyarl ve bilgili olmay gerektirir. Ancak siyasetten d lanma, özellikle kad nlarda bilgi eksikli ine yol açabilir. Cinsiyet rol sosyalle mesi, sosyo-ekonomik de kenler ve itim düzeyi, medeni durum, meslek gibi durumsal de kenler ile mevcut siyasal yönelim siyasetteki cinsiyet ayr n olu mas na ve kal la mas na sebep olmaktad r.Bu çal mada siyasal tutumlarda gözlenen cinsiyet ayr na ili kin kuramsal tart malar ele al nm r. Söz konusu cinsiyet farklar n olas nedenleri ve do urgular tart lm r. Siyasal ya amda kad nlar n en az erkekler kadar kat ma te vik edilmeleri ve edilgen konumlar terk etmeleri gerçek ilerlemenin anahtar gibi görünmektedir.Anahtar Kelimeler: Siyasal tutumlar, cinsiyet ayr , toplumsal cinsiyet sosyalle mesi, toplumsal cinsiyet rolleri, siyasal kat m. Gender Roles and Political Attitudes: A Social Psychological Evaluation AbstractConcerning political issues require being sensitive and knowledgable about that phenomen. But, being isolated from political arena can result lack of knowledge, expecially for women because of traditional gender roles. Consequently, gender role socialization, socio-economical variables and situational factors as education level, marital status, job and political orientation cause important gender gap in political attitudes and behaviors.In this study, the theoretical arguments about the gender gap in political thoughts have been discussed and the causes and effects of these gender differences have been highlighted. It has been concluded that women must be encouraged to engage in political activities as much as men and this may be the only way to overcome the women's passivity in politics.
ÖZETBu ara tırma a ırı sa , merkez ve a ırı sol siyasal tutuma sahip üniversite ö rencileri arasında (n=147) makyavelianizm, sosyal sorumluluk, denetim oda ı ve belirsizli e kar ı ho görüsüzlük bakımlarından farklılıkların olup olmadı ını belirlemek amacıyla yapılmı tır. Bunların ölçümünde Makyavelianizm (Christie ve ark.,1969), Sosyal Sorumluluk (Berkowitz ve Lutterman, 1968), Denetim Oda ı (Rotter, 1966 ABSTRACTThe objective of this study was to determine whether there were differences among extreme right, centre and extreme left oriented students in terms of machiavellianism, social responsibility, locus of control and intolerance of ambiguity. The following scales were used to measure these variables respectively; Machiavellianism (Christie and others, 1969), Social Responsibility (Berkowitz ve Lutterman, 1968), Locus of Control (Rotter, 1966) and Intolerance of Ambiguity (Martin ve Westie, 1959). All of these scales were administered to 150 university students of whom 50 represented extreme right , 50 extreme left and remaining 50 central political orientations. Data gathered with these scales were analized. The results showed that there were some differences between the subject grups in terms of the constructs at hand. Social responsibility, intolerance of ambiguity and machiavellianism levels of the extreem right group were higher than those of the extreem left. Furthermore extreme right and centre oriented students were more external than those with extreme left political orientation.
This study compares university students who have nationalist, conservative, social democrat and socialist political identities in terms of rightwing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and individualism-collectivism values. The sample was composed of 125 students with "nationalist" identity, 102 students with "conservative" identity, 144 students with "social democrat" identity and 139 students with "socialist" identity.The right-wing authoritarianism scale (RWA), social dominance orientation scale (SDO) and individualismcollectivism scale (INDCOL) were used in this study. The results showed that the students with conservative political identity received higher Öz
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.