This study classifies distinct patient groups with varying baseline risks which can be used to predict tolerability when adding an inhaled product to their management plan. Some "low risk" patients may in future be able to self-assess their tolerability for inhaled therapies at home to avoid unneeded hospital monitoring.
Background
Difficulty kneeling following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains highly prevalent, and has cultural, social, and occupational implications. With no clear evidence of superiority, whether or not to resurface the patella remains debatable. This systematic review examined whether resurfacing the patella (PR) or not (NPR) influences kneeling ability following TKA.
Methods
This systematic review was conducted by following PRISMA guidelines. Three electronic databases were searched utilizing a search strategy developed with the aid of a department librarian. Study quality was assessed using MINROS criteria. Article screening, methodological quality assessment and data extraction were performed by two independent authors, and a third senior author was consulted if consensus was not reached.
Results
A total of 459 records were identified, with eight studies included in the final analysis, and all deemed to be level III evidence. The average MINORS score was 16.5 for comparative studies and 10.5 for non-comparative studies. The total number of patients was 24,342, with a mean age of 67.6 years. Kneeling ability was predominantly measured as a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), with two studies also including an objective assessment. Two studies demonstrated a statistically significant link between PR and kneeling, with one demonstrating improved kneeling ability with PR and the other reporting the opposite. Other potential factors associated with kneeling included gender, postoperative flexion, and body mass index (BMI). Re-operation rates were significantly higher in the NPR cohort whereas PR cohorts had higher Feller scores, patient-reported limp and patellar apprehension.
Conclusion
Despite its importance to patients, kneeling remains not only under-reported but also ill-defined in the literature, with no clear consensus regarding the optimum outcome assessment tool. Conflicting evidence remains as to whether PR influences kneeling ability, and to clarify the situation, large prospective randomized studies are required.
BackgroundCardiac lipomas are rare benign primary cardiac tumours primarily composed of mature adipocytes. They are usually well defined, encapsulated masses, but rarely demonstrate malignant characteristics by infiltrating the myocardium. This causes diagnostic uncertainty as it becomes a priority to rule out primary malignant cardiac tumours such as sarcoma which often carry a poor prognosis.Case ReportA 61 year old female presenting with chest pain was found to have an infiltrating right atrial hypertrophic mass. Mutli-disciplinary team (MDT) discussions along with the presence of symptoms and likelihood of malignancy led to the recommendations for surgery.Intraoperatively this involved the right pulmonary veins and superior vena cava (SVC). The mass was resected with good margins and reconstruction of the right atrium, pulmonary veins and SVC was done using porcine pericardial patch. The patient made a good postoperative recovery and was discharged home in sinus rhythm with no significant valvular lesions. This was further confirmed at 6 month follow up. Final histology was that of infiltrating lipoma.ConclusionsIn this rare case of infiltrating cardiac lipoma in a relatively young patient, the diagnostic uncertainty despite multimodal imaging meant surgery was indicated due to the high suspicion of cancer. Even in benign cases, fatty infiltration can lead to conduction defects and embolisation. Technical difficulties in sectioning these specimens is caused by intra-tumour variability and current recommendations are for excision biopsy, for best characterisation.The management of these patients requires an MDT with Cardiac surgery being a safe approach providing definitive management.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.