INTRODUCTION Intra-operative peritoneal lavage (IOPL) is widely practised but its benefits are unclear. The frequency and pattern of its use amongst general surgeons is investigated.METHODS A postal questionnaire was sent to 153 general surgical consultants and registrars enquiring about their use of IOPL. The surgeon was asked the volume and type of lavage fluid used, under various circumstances.RESULTS 118 (77%) questionnaires were returned. 115 (97%) surgeons used IOPL. The majority of surgeons (61%) lavaged until the fluid was clear, 20% used more than 1 l and 17% used between 500-1000 ml. In the case of the dirty abdomen (i.e. gross pus or faecal peritonitis), 47% used saline as the lavage fluid, 38% aqueous betadine, 9% water and 3% antibiotic lavage. Similar results were found in the case of a contaminated abdomen (i.e. a breached hollow viscus). 34% of surgeons used IOPL during clean cases. 36% used water lavage during intra-abdominal cancer surgery; 21% lavaged with saline and 17% with betadine. More registrars (47%) than consultants (29%) lavaged with water during cancer surgery. Consultants, however, used more aqueous betadine.CONCLUSIONS The frequency of use and choice of lavage fluid varies widely. The successful management of the septic abdomen rests on at least 3 tenants -systemic antibiotics, control of the source of infection and aspiration of gross contaminants. There is little good evidence in the literature to support IOPL in the management of the septic abdomen. The use of IOPL during cancer surgery is supported by in vitro evidence. The current use of IOPL, as shown by this study, appears not to be evidence based.
Our experience suggests increasing necrotising (malignant) otitis externa incidence, and retrospective analysis of Hospital Episodes Statistics data supports this observation. Necrotising (malignant) otitis externa poses challenges in management, as exemplified in our cases, requiring a high index of suspicion and early aggressive treatment to achieve cure.
Arteriovenous fistula of the superficial temporal artery is a rare condition most commonly caused by trauma. Traditional surgical treatment has been superseded by endovascular embolization. We present the case of a 40 year-old man with a traumatic arteriovenous fistula of the superficial temporal artery who was treated by endovascular embolization. The advantages of this approach are discussed, along with a brief history of the condition.
Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is a sub-epithelial blistering disease that primarily involves mucosal surfaces but may also involve the skin. Clinically, it appears as vesiculobullous lesions of the oral cavity and eyes, but other tissues such as the nasopharyngeal and laryngeal mucosa can also be affected. Ultimately, scarring and airway stenosis may occur. The condition should be managed by a multidisciplinary team led by a dermatologist. Immunosuppressive therapy forms the mainstay of treatment, with surgery having both a diagnostic role and a use in the treatment of complications such as airway obstruction. There must be a low threshold of suspicion for laryngeal involvement in this group of patients, so that prompt action can be taken. Once laryngeal stenosis has occurred repeated endoscopic laser excision of scar tissue can be used to maintain an adequate airway. Adjuvant use of mitomycin-C can be used beneficially in the treatment of laryngeal complications of MMP.
Traumatic facial nerve neuroma is rare. There are only 10 reported cases in the literature, caused either by physical trauma or chronic inflammation. Traumatic facial neuromata differ from true facial nerve neoplasms in radiological, macroscopic and microscopic appearance, but clinical presentation is less reliable in differentiating the two. Management depends on the pre-operative grade of facial palsy, as this is a benign condition and surgical management carries a risk of further affecting facial nerve function. We present a further case of traumatic facial nerve neuroma following surgery for cholesteatoma. We also review the literature and discuss the management of this condition.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.