IMPORTANCE Advances in smartphone photography (both quality and image transmission) may improve access to care via direct parent-to-clinician telemedicine. However, the accuracy of diagnoses that are reliant on parent-provided photographs has not been formally compared with diagnoses made in person.OBJECTIVE To assess whether smartphone photographs of pediatric skin conditions taken by parents are of sufficient quality to permit accurate diagnosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSA prospective study was conducted among 40 patient-parent dyads at a pediatric dermatology clinic at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia from March 1 to September 30, 2016, to assess concordance between diagnoses made by an independent pediatric dermatologist based on in-person examination and those based on parental photographs. Half of the patient-parent dyads were randomized for a secondary analysis to receive instructions on how best to take photographs with smartphones. Clinicians were blinded to whether parents had received photography instructions.EXPOSURES Half of the patient-parent dyads received a simple, 3-step instruction sheet on how best to take photographs using a smartphone (intervention group); the other half did not (control group). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Concordance between photograph-based vs in-persondiagnosis in the intervention vs control groups, as quantified using Cohen κ, a measure of interrater agreement that takes into account the possibility of agreement occurring by chance.RESULTS Among the 40 patient-parent dyads (22 female children and 18 male children; mean [SD] age, 6.96 [5.23] years), overall concordance between photograph-based vs in-person diagnosis was 83% (95% CI, 71%-94%; κ = 0.81). Diagnostic concordance was 89% (95% CI, 75%-97%; κ = 0.88) in a subgroup of 37 participants with photographs considered of high enough quality to make a diagnosis. No statistically significant effect of photography instructions on concordance was detected (group that received instructions, 85%; group that did not receive instructions, 80%; P = .68). In cases of diagnostic disagreement, appropriate follow-up was suggested.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Parent-operated smartphone photography can accurately be used as a method to provide pediatric dermatologic care. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03246945

Background/Objectives: Long wait times for in-person appointments in pediatric dermatology can lead to delays in specialty care, additional health system touchpoints, patient and family dissatisfaction, poorer outcomes, and increased overall health care costs. Store-and-forward teledermatology may address these challenges and improve access to care in pediatric dermatology. Methods: We describe a prospective, non-blinded cohort study with follow-up surveys conducted from March 1, 2018, to September 20, 2018. The study was conducted at a single center, in primary care and specialist settings. Patients included were <18 years old and received care at one of our affiliated primary care sites. Primary care providers submitted teledermatology consultations through a shared electronic medical record. A board-certified pediatric dermatologist evaluated each consultation; primary care providers conveyed recommendations to families. Results: Forty-three consultations for patients (23 male, 20 female; median age: 7 years [IQR: 2.4-12]) were entered by primary care providers. Median time from consult request to dermatologist initiating consult was 12.1 hours [IQR: 1.9-18.8]; median time to complete consult note was 7 minutes [IQR: 5-10.5]. Median time from primary care provider initially consulting to conveying teledermatology recommendations to families was 3 days [IQR: 1-5]. All but one consult (42/43, 98%) were completed in the intended workflow. Follow-up in-person visits with pediatric dermatologists occurred with 10/43 (23%) patients. In follow-up surveys, parents were 83% likely to recommend the service to family and friends. All primary care providers and dermatologists felt the service improved quality of care. Conclusions: Provider-to-provider teledermatology consultation appears to be a feasible and acceptable method of providing care quickly and effectively to pediatric patients.

A mobile health app allowing families to directly consult a pediatric dermatologist was usable, acceptable, and expedited care.

Due to the global shortage of PPE caused by increasing number of COVID-19 patients in recent months, many hospitals have had difficulty procuring adequate PPE for the clinicians who care for these patients. Faced with a shortage, hospitals have had to implement new PPE conservation policies. In this paper, we describe a tool to help hospitals better project PPE needs under various conservation policies. Though this tool is built on top of projections of the number of hospitalized COVID-19 patients, it is agnostic as to which model--of which many are available--provides these projections. The tool combines COVID-19 patient census projections with information like staffing ratios and frequency of patient contact to provide projections of the number of items of key types of PPE needed under three built-in conservation scenarios: standard, contingency, and crisis. Users are also able to customize the tool to the specifics of their hospital and design custom conservation policies.

No abstract

Vemurafenib, a selective BRAF kinase inhibitor, has been found to induce several cutaneous adverse effects, ranging from a keratosis pilaris‐like reaction to squamous cell carcinoma. While photosensitivity has been well described as one of these manifestations, we report a case of a 6‐year‐old boy on vemurafenib who developed a severe blistering sunburn after only two 30‐minute episodes of sun exposure. A brief review of other common cutaneous adverse effects of vemurafenib is also provided.

No abstract

No abstract