Objective. More than one million people each year in the United States are diagnosed with cancer. Surgery is considered curative, but the perioperative phase represents a vulnerable period for residual disease to spread. Regional anesthesia has been proposed to reduce the incidence of recurrence by attenuating the sympathetic nervous system's response during surgery, reducing opioid requirements thus diminishing their immunosuppressant effects, and providing antitumor and antiinflammatory effects directly through systemic local anesthetic action. In this article, we present a description of the perioperative period, a summary of the proposed hypotheses and available literature on the effects of regional anesthesia on cancer recurrence, and put regional anesthesia in context in regard to its potential role in reducing cancer recurrence during the perioperative period.Methods. A literature review was conducted through PubMed by examining the following topics: effects of surgery on tumor progression, roles of multiple perioperative variables (analgesics, hypothermia, blood transfusion, beta-blockade) in cancer recurrence, and available in vitro, animal, and human studies regarding the effects of regional anesthesia on cancer recurrence.Results. in vitro, animal and human retrospective studies suppport the hypothesis that in certain types of cancer, regional anesthesia may be associated with lower recurrence rates. A few well-planned human randomized clinical trials are currently under way that may provide more solid evidence to substantiate or refute the benefits of regional anesthesia in reducing cancer recurrence.Conclusions. The benefits of regional anesthesia in reducing cancer recurrence have a sound theoretical basis and, in certain cancers, are supported by the existing body of literature. This article outlines the current state of our knowledge on the relationship between cancer progression and regional analgesia.

Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New Background There is confusion regarding the spread of intraneurally injected local anesthetic agents during regional anesthesia. The aim of this research was to deliberately inject a marker that does not leave the neural compartment into which it is injected, and then to study the longitudinal and circumferential spread and possible pathways of intraneural spread. Methods After institutional review board approval, we intraneurally injected 20 and 5 ml of heparinized blood solution under ultrasound guidance into 12 sciatic nerves in the popliteal fossa and 10 median nerves, respectively, of eight fresh, unembalmed cadavers using standard 22-gauge “D” needles, mimicking the blocks in clinical conditions. Ultrasound evidence of nerve swelling confirmed intraneural injection. Samples of the nerves were then examined under light and scanning electron microscopy. Results Extrafascicular spread was observed in all the adipocyte-containing neural compartments of the 664 cross-section samples we examined, but intrafascicular spread was seen in only 6 cross-sections of two nerves. None of the epineurium, perineurium, or neural components were disrupted in any of the samples. Spread between the layers of the perineurium was a route of spread that included the perineurium surrounding the fascicles and the perineurium that formed incomplete septa in the fascicles. Similar to the endoneurium proper, subepineural compartments that did not contain any fat cells did not reveal any spread of heparinized blood solution cells. No “perineural” spaces were observed within the endoneurium. We also did not observe any true intrafascicular spread. Conclusions After deliberate intraneural injection, longitudinal and circumferential extrafascicular spread occurred in all instances in the neural compartments that contained adipocytes, but not in the relatively solid endoneurium of the fascicles.

Objective To better understand the unexpected spread of contrast medium observed by conventional fluoroscopic X‐ray images during standard neuraxial techniques used in the treatment of pain. The support of 3D reconstruction of MRI images of structures within the lumbar spine was used to better understand the space of Okada. Methods Lumbar facet joint and epidural corticosteroid injections in five patients under fluoroscopic guidance with loss of resistance to air or saline to identify the facet joints or epidural space. Next, in a retrospective study, the authors examined the retrodural space of Okada and the neighboring tissues with 3D reconstruction of spinal MRIs of seven patients without any demonstrable spinal pathology to better understand the characteristics of the space of Okada. Results Contrast medium spread to the ipsilateral and contralateral sides was observed in five patients. The contralateral spread was thought to be through the retrodural space of Okada, which is a potential space between the anterior surface of the vertebral lamina and the posterior surface of the ligamentum flavum. It facilitates communication between the contralateral articular facet joints of the spine. Conclusions This study provides new evidence for the existence of the space of Okada where an unexpected contralateral spread occurred following facet joint and attempted epidural injection. The 3D reconstructions of MRIs may help us better understand the nature of the retrodural space of Okada and its clinical implications.

Background and Objectives The ultrasound‐guided proximal infraclavicular costoclavicular block (PICB) appears popular but its results are inconsistent. We sought an accurate demonstration of septae formed between the brachial plexus cords. Methods We performed in‐plane, lateral‐to‐medial PICBs on 120 patients and recorded images. Once the most superficial lateral cord component was entered, a 0.4–0.6 mA current was applied to confirm needle placement; 5 ml of local anesthetic (LA) solution was then injected and its spread was observed and recorded. As the needle was advanced, the presence or absence of a hyperechoic linear structure was noted before the deeper compartment was reached, specifically looking for the possible displacement of such a septum. Results Upon initial scanning, a septum was observed in 67 of the 120 patients (46.2%). However, there was clear displacement of a linear septum between the lateral cord compartment and the medial and posterior cord compartments that prevented spread between the compartments in 94.16% of patients. Piercing the septum evoked motor responses from the medial or posterior cord. The same anatomical regions were studied microanatomically by analyzing cross‐sections obtained with the same approach angle as the ultrasound probe. Conclusions Intraplexus fascial septae that bundled the medial and posterior cords into one compartment and separated them from the lateral cord were demonstrated and confirmed microanatomically. This suggests the need for two separate injections (or two separate catheter placements for continuous peripheral nerve blockade) into the superficial and deep compartments to ensure LA spread around all three cords of the brachial plexus at this level.

No abstract

Background and objectivesDocumentation is important for quality improvement, education, and research. There is currently a lack of recommendations regarding key aspects of documentation in regional anesthesia. The aim of this study was to establish recommendations for documentation in regional anesthesia.MethodsFollowing the formation of the executive committee and a directed literature review, a long list of potential documentation components was created. A modified Delphi process was then employed to achieve consensus amongst a group of international experts in regional anesthesia. This consisted of 2 rounds of anonymous electronic voting and a final virtual round table discussion with live polling on items not yet excluded or accepted from previous rounds. Progression or exclusion of potential components through the rounds was based on the achievement of strong consensus. Strong consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement and weak consensus as 50%–74% agreement.ResultsSeventy-seven collaborators participated in both rounds 1 and 2, while 50 collaborators took part in round 3. In total, experts voted on 83 items and achieved a strong consensus on 51 items, weak consensus on 3 and rejected 29.ConclusionBy means of a modified Delphi process, we have established expert consensus on documentation in regional anesthesia.

Objective Our aim was to study the posterior lumbar epidural space with 3D reconstructions of magnetic resonance images (MRIs) and to compare and validate the findings with targeted anatomic microdissections. Design We performed 3D reconstructions of high-resolution MRIs from seven patients and normal-resolution MRIs commonly used in clinical practice from 196 other random patients. We then dissected and photographed the lumbar spine areas of four fresh cadavers. Results From the 3D reconstructions of the MRIs, we verified that the distribution of the posterior fat pad had an irregular shape that resembled a truncated pyramid. It spanned between the superior margin of the lamina of the caudad vertebra and beyond the inferior margin to almost halfway underneath the cephalad lamina of the cranial vertebra, and it was not longitudinally or circumferentially continuous. The 3D reconstructions of the high-definition MRI also consistently revealed a prelaminar fibrous body that was not seen in most of the usually used low-definition MRI reconstructions. Targeted microdissections confirmed the 3D reconstruction findings and also showed the prelaminar tissue body to be fibrous, crossing from side to side anterior to the cephalad half of each lamina, and spanning from the dural sac to the laminae. Conclusions Three-dimensional reconstructions and targeted microdissection revealed the unique appearance of posterior fat pads and a prelaminar fibrous body. The exact consistency, presence, prevalence with age, presence in other regions, and function of this body are unknown and require further research.

Acute compartment syndrome (ACS) is an infrequent but true medical emergency caused by an increase in pressure in noncompliant tissue compartments resulting in decreased blood flow, ischemia, and tissue necrosis. At present, it is mainly a clinical diagnosis of pain “out of proportion” to the clinical scenario. Other signs such as paresthesia, paralysis, and the lack of peripheral pulses are, usually, late symptoms. Early diagnosis and treatment can be the difference between preserving function of the affected extremity, permanent functional loss, or even amputation. Regional anesthesia and analgesia are controversial in patients at risk for compartment syndrome due to potential masking of ischemic pain associated with ACS. A recent and growing body of anecdotal case reports and research evidence, however, suggests that ischemic pain pathways are complex and may differ from those of nociceptive or neuropathic pain. That is, ischemic pain most likely has a sympathetic pathway that cannot be completely blocked by peripheral nerve blocks. This article explores the possible role and controversies surrounding the use of regional anesthesia, continuous peripheral nerve blocks, and analgesia in patients at risk of developing ACS.