In last few decades, nitrogen‐containing heterocycles have maintained their status as an important core of FDA‐approved drugs and medicinally active compounds. Quinoxaline is one such class of nitrogen‐containing scaffold that has become a subject of extensive research as it possess a plethora of biological activities. Molecular hybridization is a versatile and rational approach to drug design that involves the combination of two bioactive molecules possessing distinct intrinsic activity into a single scaffold for enhancing their therapeutic potential. In view of this, the advancement and potential of quinoxaline hybrids bearing thiazole, triazole, oxadiazole, pyrrolizines, pyrazole, etc. have attracted the keen attention of researchers to explore their therapeutic ability against different biological targets. The present review includes the research in the recent years (2018–2023) and addresses the graceful advancements in the studies related to quinoxaline‐based small molecules including their synthetic routes, biological activities and structure‐activity relationships. We anticipate that this review article will provide comprehensive knowledge of pharmacological importance of quinoxaline analogues and will fulfill the need of scientific community in designing and developing efficacious novel molecules.
The thiazolidine-4-one scaffold has recently emerged as a potential pharmacophore having clinical significance for medicinal chemists. This heterocyclic ring has been reported to possess a plethora of biological activities, including antidiabetic activity that has inspired researchers to integrate this core with different pharmacophoric fragments to design novel and effective antidiabetic leads. The antidiabetic activity has been observed due to the ability of the thiazolidine-4-one nucleus to interact with different biological targets, including peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ, protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B, aldose reductase, α-glucosidase, and α-amylase. The present review discusses the mode of action of thiazolidine-4-ones through these antidiabetic drug targets. This review attempts to summarize and analyze the recent developments with regard to the antidiabetic potential of thiazolidine-4-ones covering different synthetic strategies, structure-activity relationships, and docking studies reported in the literature. The significance of various structural modifications at C-2, N-3, and C-5 of the thiazolidine-4-one ring has also been discussed in this manuscript. This comprehensive compilation will provide an inevitable scope for the design and development of potential antidiabetic drug candidates having a thiazolidine-4-one core.
Diabetes is a chronic, and metabolic disorder that has gained epidemic proportions in the past few decades creating a threat throughout the globe. It is characterized by increased glucose levels that may be due to immune-mediated disorders (T1DM), insulin resistance or inability to produce sufficient insulin by β-pancreatic cells (T2DM), gestational, or an increasingly sedentary lifestyle. The progression of the disease is marked by several pathological changes in the body like nephropathy, retinopathy, and various cardiovascular complications. Treatment options for T1DM are majorly focused on insulin replacement therapy. While T2DM is generally treated through oral hypoglycemics that include metformin, sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, meglitinides, incretins, SGLT-2 inhibitors, and amylin antagonists. Multidrug therapy is often recommended when patients are found incompliant with the first-line therapy. Despite the considerable therapeutic benefits of these oral hypoglycemics, there lie greater side effects (weight variation, upset stomach, skin rashes, and risk of hepatic disease), and limitations including short half-life, frequent dosing, and differential bioavailability which inspires the researchers to pursue novel drug targets and small molecules having promising clinical efficacy posing minimum side-effects. This review summarizes some of the current emerging novel approaches along with the conventional drug targets to treat type 2 diabetes.
The cannabinoid (CB) signalling cascade is widely located in the human body and is as-sociated with several pathophysiological processes. The endocannabinoid system comprises canna-binoid receptors CB1 and CB2, which belong to G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). CB1 recep-tors are primarily located on nerve terminals, prohibiting neurotransmitter release, whereas CB2 are present predominantly on immune cells, causing cytokine release. The activation of CB system con-tributes to the development of several diseases which might have lethal consequences, such as CNS disorders, cancer, obesity, and psychotic disorders on human health. Clinical evidence revealed that CB1 receptors are associated with CNS ailments such as Alzheimer’s disease, Huntington’s disease, and multiple sclerosis, whereas CB2 receptors are primarily connected with immune disorders, pain, inflammation, etc. Therefore, cannabinoid receptors have been proved to be promising targets in therapeutics and drug discovery. Experimental and clinical outcomes have disclosed the success sto-ry of CB antagonists, and several research groups have framed newer compounds with the binding potential to these receptors. In the presented review, we have summarized variously reported heter-ocycles with CB receptor agonistic/antagonistic properties against CNS disorders, cancer, obesity, and other complications. The structural activity relationship aspects have been keenly described along with enzymatic assay data. The specific outcomes of molecular docking studies have also been highlighted to get insights into the binding patterns of the molecules to CB receptors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.