ART does not have a negative effect on shoulder function after ND. SAN is always functionally impaired even if we preserve it macroscopically during ND.

Prolonged and 1-day antibiotic regimens for both clean and clean-contaminated procedures were similar in efficacy (7% vs 3% for clean procedures [P = 0.165] and 30% vs 28% for clean-contaminated procedures [P = 0.777]). The wound infection rate was higher (13%) after clean radical neck dissections versus other clean procedures (1%) (P = 0.001). For clean-contaminated procedures, factors affecting postoperative wound infection rates were performance of bilateral neck dissections (P = 0.014), disease stage (P = 0.002), type of laryngectomy (P = 0.002), and history of prior tracheotomy (P = 0.006).

The most common morbidity associated with selective neck dissection (SND; II-IV) is spinal accessory nerve dysfunction and related shoulder disability. Nerve dysfunction is usually attributed to stretching of the nerve during clearance of lymph nodes lying posterior and superior to the spinal accessory nerve (level IIb). If these lymph nodes were left in place and not removed, stretching of the spinal accessory nerve during neck dissection and postoperative shoulder disability could be avoided. 113 SNDs (II-IV) performed on clinically N0 necks of patients with laryngeal carcinoma were enrolled in this prospective study. During SND, level IIb was separately removed and processed. Mean number of lymph nodes in level IIb was 6.26 (range, 0-19). In none of the 113 SND (II-IV) specimens did level IIb contain metastases, thus providing an oncological basis that leaving these lymph nodes in place is an oncologically safe approach, probably avoiding postoperative shoulder disability.

Serum and drainage levels of triglycerides and cholesterol on postoperative day 1 can be used as objective and early predictive parameters of CF.

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a frequent disease which can be classified as eosinophilic or neutrophilic based on dominant inflammatory cell type at tissue. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of classifying nasal polyps as eosinophilic or neutrophilic on treatment outcomes. The study was conducted with 40 patients who underwent either surgical or medical treatment with the diagnosis of CRSwNP. The patients were classified into two groups for further assessment up to eosinophil intensity at polyp tissue. All patients were examined by nasal endoscopy and paranasal computed tomography (CT). Before treatment, subjective symptom score, nasal endoscopy score, and CT score were measured. Subsequently, they were reevaluated by similar diagnostic tests after either medical or surgical treatment at sixth month. The preoperative subjective symptom score, endoscopy score, and paranasal CT score were compared between chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with eosinophilic nasal polyps (E-NP) (CRSwE-NP) group and CRS with neutrophilic nasal polyps group and there was no difference between the two groups (p = 0.369, p = 0.310 and p = 0.494 respectively). Although after treatment in both groups symptom score and endoscopy score were significantly improved but not the CT score, we found no difference in between the groups at sixth month. In most of the previous studies, patients with CRSwE-NP were assumed to have poor prognosis and high recurrence rate despite surgical or medical treatment. However, we did not find any association between eosinophilic or neutrophilic nature of nasal polyp tissue and disease severity.