Nowadays, due to recent advances in molecular biology, the pathogenesis of glioblastoma is better understood. For the newly diagnosed, the current standard of care is represented by resection followed by radiotherapy and temozolomide administration, but because median overall survival remains poor, new diagnosis and treatment strategies are needed. Due to the quick progression, even with aggressive multimodal treatment, glioblastoma remains almost incurable. It is known that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification is a characteristic of the classical subtype of glioma. However, targeted therapies against this type of receptor have not yet shown a clear clinical benefit. Many factors contribute to resistance, such as ineffective blood–brain barrier penetration, heterogeneity, mutations, as well as compensatory signaling pathways. A better understanding of the EGFR signaling network, and its interrelations with other pathways, are essential to clarify the mechanisms of resistance and create better therapeutic agents.

From all central nervous system tumors, gliomas are the most common. Nowadays, researchers are looking for more efficient treatments for these tumors, as well as ways for early diagnosis. Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are major targets for oncology and the development of small-molecule RTK inhibitors has been proven successful in cancer treatment. Mutations or aberrant activation of the RTKs and their intracellular signaling pathways are linked to several malignant diseases, including glioblastoma. The progress in the understanding of malignant glioma evolution has led to RTK targeted therapies with high capacity to improve the therapeutic response while reducing toxicity. In this review, we present the most important RTKs (i.e. EGFR, IGFR, PDGFR and VEGFR) currently used for developing cancer therapeutics together with the potential of RTK-related drugs in glioblastoma treatment. Also, we focus on some therapeutic agents that are currently at different stages of research or even in clinical phases and proved to be suitable as re-purposing candidates for glioblastoma treatment.

Glioblastoma (GB) is highly vascularised tumour, known to exhibit enhanced infiltrative potential. One of the characteristics of glioblastoma is microvascular proliferation surrounding necrotic areas, as a response to a hypoxic environment, which in turn increases the expression of angiogenic factors and their signalling pathways (RAS/RAF/ERK/MAPK pathway, PI3K/Akt signalling pathway and WTN signalling cascade). Currently, a small number of anti-angiogenic drugs, extending glioblastoma patients survival, are available for clinical use. Most medications are ineffective in clinical therapy of glioblastoma due to acquired malignant cells or intrinsic resistance, angiogenic receptors cross-activation and redundant intracellular signalling, or the inability of the drug to cross the blood-brain barrier and to reach its target in vivo. Researchers have also observed that GB tumours are different in many aspects, even when they derive from the same tissue, which is the reason for personalised therapy.An understanding of the molecular mechanisms regulating glioblastoma angiogenesis and invasion may be important in the future development of curative therapeutic approaches for the treatment of this devastating disease.

In this study, we investigated the protein expression of platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), insulin like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-K) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2) in five primary glioblastoma (GB), with a view to their possible use as therapeutic targets. Our results demonstrated that appreciable levels of these proteins could be detected in the analysed GB cell lines, except for a low level of PDGFR and ERK1/2 expression in one GB cell line. The small molecule inhibitors towards IGF-1R, PDGFR, PI3-K and ERK1/2 respectively, have only modest or no anti-tumour activity on GB cells and therefore their combination with other therapy modalities was analysed. The interaction between small inhibitors and radiation was mostly additive or sub-additive; synergistic interaction was found in five of forty analysed combinations. Our results showed that GB cells are in general resistant to treatment and illustrate the difficulties in predicting the treatment response in malignant gliomas.

Immunotherapy holds great promise in the treatment of high grade glioma (HGG). We performed a comprehensive meta-analysis of clinical trials involving dendritic cell (DC) therapy and viral therapy (VT) for the treatment of HGG, in order to assess their clinical impact in comparison to standard treatments in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis to evaluate VT for the treatment of HGG, allowing comparison of different immunotherapeutic approaches. Thirteen eligible studies of 1043 cases were included in the meta-analysis. For DC vaccination, in terms of OS, both newly diagnosed patients (HR, 0.65) and patients who suffered from recurrent HGGs (HR = 0.63) presented markedly improved results compared to the control groups. PFS was also improved (HR = 0.49) but was not statistically significant (p = 0.1). A slight improvement was observed for newly diagnosed patients receiving VT in terms of OS (HR = 0.88) while PFS was inferior for patients in the experimental arm (HR = 1.16). Our results show that DC therapy greatly improves OS for patients with both newly diagnosed and recurrent HGGs. VT, however, did not provide any statistically significant improvements in terms of OS and PFS for patients with newly diagnosed HGGs.

Increased expression and activation of receptor tyrosine kinases frequently occur in human brain tumors, mediating a variety of growth-promoting pathways and leading to radioresistance; however, little is known about their motogenic potency relative to one another. In this study, we found co-expression of Insulin like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) and platelet derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) in two high-grade gliomas (HGG) cell lines 18 and 38. Dual targeting of IGF-1R and PDGFR increased cell death in both 18 and 38 cell lines in comparison to inhibition of either receptor alone. In addition, co-inhibition of IGF-1R and PDGFR increased radiosensitivity in 18 cells but failed to intensify the effect of radiation in 38 cells. In HGG cells, radiation-induced cell death has been connected to the activation of c-Jun-NH2-terminal kinase-1 (JNK1). We found that JNK1 was weakly expressed in 38 cells while it had an elevated expression in 18 cells. Exposure to ionizing radiation induced JNK1 activation only in 18 cells without affecting the protein activity in 38 cells. These results suggest that in 18 cell line radiation-activated JNK1 may provide an anti-proliferative signaling, parallel to receptors co-targeting. To test this hypothesis, HGG cells were treated with dominant negative JNK1 (dnJNK1) and the response to radiation was assayed in presence or absence of receptors co-inhibition. Indeed dnJNK protected 18 cells against gamma-irradiation-induced cell death. dnJNK treatment did not influence radiation response of the 38 cell line, which expressed low levels of JNK1. In conclusion we found that IGF-1R and PDGFR co-inhibition caused an increased cell death in two HGG cell line and induced the radiosensitization of the JNK1 expressing cell line.

The insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) mitogenic signaling mediates malignant cell survival by many complex and redundant pathways. This study compared the effects of IGF-1R inhibition on viability and apoptosis of two NSCLC cell lines, using three different methods for the impairment of IGF-1R function: (IR3, an anti-IGF-1R antibody; tyrphostin AG1024, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and IGF-1R-small interfering RNA (siRNA). IGF-1R inhibition led to a decrease of cell survival and induced apoptosis in a manner depending on the approach used for the receptor inhibition. To find an explanation, we analyzed the effects of these treatments on three major antiapoptotic pathways evoked by IGF-1R signaling: IRS-1, Shc and 14.3.3-dependent mitochondrial translocation of Raf-1 kinase (mitRaf). (IR3 downregulated IRS-1 phosphorylation in A549 cells and Shc phosphorylation in U1810 cells. While in A549 cells AG1024 treatment decreased both IRS-1 and Shc phosphorylation, in U1810 cells the IRS-1 phosphorylation was only slightly affected and the Shc phosphorylation drastically downregulated. Neither (IR3 nor AG1024 had any effect on Raf-1 kinase translocation. Irrespective of the cell line, IGF-1R-siRNA treatment induced downregulation of both IRS-1 and Shc phosphorylation coupled with the abrogation of mitRaf. In addition, the IGF-1R-siRNA proved to be the most potent inducer of apoptosis suggesting that more than one antiapoptotic pathway in IGF-1R signaling should be inhibited to effectively induce apoptosis in lung cancer cells.

Lack of effectiveness of radiation therapy may arise from different factors such as radiation induced receptor tyrosine kinase activation and cell repopulation; cell capability to repair radiation induced DNA damage; high grade glioma (HGG) tumous heterogeneity, etc. In this study, we analyzed the potential of targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in inducing radiosensitivity in two human HGG cell lines (11 and 15) that displayed similar growth patterns and expressed the receptor protein at the cell surface. We found that 15 HGG cells that express more EGFR at the cell surface were more sensitive to AG556 (an EGFR inhibitor), compared to 11 HGG cells. Although in line 15 the effect of the inhibitor was greater than in line 11, it should be noted that the efficacy of this small-molecule EGFR inhibitor as monotherapy in both cell lines has been modest, at best. Our data showed a slight difference in the response to radiation of the HGG cell lines, three days after the treatment, with line 15 responding better than line 11. However, both cell lines responded to ionizing radiation in the same way, seven days after irradiation. EGFR inhibition induced radiosensitivity in 11 HGG cells, while, in 15 HGG cells, the effect of AG556 treatment on radiation response was almost nonexistent.