No abstract

There is evidence that resting cells are able to produce molecules with antiproliferative activity, some of which behave as short-lived repressor proteins. We suggest that transient inhibition of protein synthesis in resting cells would lead to a decrease in the levels of these negative growth regulators and might, therefore, promote mitogenic responses. We report that treatment of resting (serum-deprived) NIH 3T3 cells with cyclocheximide (CH) or puromycin induces expression of c-fos, c-jun and c-myc proto-oncogenes in a manner similar to that of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF). Actinomycin D (Act D) abrogates the induction of proto-oncogene expression. Transient inhibition of protein synthesis by CH or puromycin also induces the resting NIH 3T3 and C3H 1OT1/2 cells to enter the cell cycle. Inhibition of new RNA or protein synthesis abolishes the proliferative response. These findings show that control mechanisms at both transcriptional and translational levels are operative in the resting cells treated with protein synthesis inhibitors. Cell fusion experiments with resting and serum-stimulated NIH 3T3 cells revealed that brief pre-incubation of resting cells with either PDGF, CH or puromycin abrogates their ability to suppress the onset of DNA synthesis in the nuclei of stimulated cells in heterodikaryons. However, the abrogative effect of PDGF disappeared in the presence of Act D, whereas the effects of protein synthesis inhibitors did not, indicating their independence of the induction of transcription. The data suggest that the observed effects of protein synthesis inhibitors are connected with elimination of some short-lived negative growth regulators, since a brief translational arrest is sufficient for the resumption of DNA synthesis in the nuclei of stimulated cells blocked by resting cells in heterodikaryons.

The review is concerned with the transition of cells into a specific physiological state—the resting period—in which they may stay for an indefinite time interval without undergoing division or differentiation but retaining both of these potentials. When stimulated such cells may enter into mitotic cycle, divide and differentiate. No direct correlation between the onset of the differentiated state and the transition of cells through the mitotic cycle has been established. It cannot be excluded that sometimes cells may differentiate directly from the resting period. However, there is a large body of evidence that the entry of cells into mitotic cycle is a necessary prerequisite for subsequent differentiation. The susceptibility of cells to differentiative stimuli is retained during the mitotic cycle. The completion of mitosis itself does not imply that a cell will undergo differentiation; in the absence of adequate stimulus it may pass again into a resting period. According to what is known at present it is suggested that cells may pass into a true resting stage not only after completing mitosis but also after doubling their DNA content. It is also conceivable that a cell may pass into a resting period at different stages of its life cycle. The essential feature of the cell life cycle is the alternation of resting periods and periods of active proliferation. This general principle of organization provides conditions necessary for population‐size control, cell differentiation, interaction of a given population with other systems, and the reactions of cells to a changing environment.

No abstract

Serum-deprived (0.1-0.2%) resting NIH 3T3 mouse fibroblasts pre-incubated with cycloheximide (7.5 micrograms/ml), or puromycin (10 micrograms/ml), were fused with stimulated cells taken 10 h after changing the medium to one containing 10% serum, and DNA synthesis was investigated in the nuclei of monokaryons, homodikaryons and heterodikaryons using radioautography with the double-labelling technique. Pre-incubation of resting cells with inhibitors of protein synthesis for 1-4 h abolished their ability to suppress DNA synthesis in stimulated nuclei in heterokaryons. Three hours after the removal of cycloheximide from the medium, the resting cells acquired once again the inhibitory capacity for entry of stimulated nuclei into the S period. This inhibitory influence disappeared also in the case of post-fusion cycloheximide application as well as following an 8-12 h pre-treatment of resting cells with actinomycin D (1 microgram/ml) prior to fusion. Pre-incubation of resting cells for 12 h with PDGF (1 u/ml-1) followed by an 8-48 h incubation in serum-free medium stimulated the onset of DNA synthesis. A brief exposure (45 min) of resting cells to cycloheximide (7.5 micrograms/ml), or puromycin (7.5 micrograms/ml), exerted a similar effect, inducing by itself the entry of cells into the S period. The results support the assumption that acquirement, by resting cells, of competence for DNA replication includes as a necessary step the down-regulation of intracellular growth inhibitors whose formation depends on protein synthesis.