One of the community services developed by the Faculty of Cultural Sciences provides an assistance to the community of Kauman village in preparation for Kauman village development as Yogyakarta living museum. In this case, Kauman area will serve as a kind of village that has a sustainable cultural tradition since the founding of Ngayogyokarto Hadiningrat Sultanate. In accordance with the concept of the living museum, many kinds of ideas will be implemented to regain the old cultural traditions that were taken from interviews with Kauman elders, community fgures, and young people about the history of Kampung Kauman. Te interviews are basically an intangible heritage which its narrative was attached to the landscape of Kauman village. Te results obtained from the interviews is a collective memory of Kauman village society to the development history of Kauman village. Te compilation and determination of the location, the building, the narrative house of historical formation, and the tradition that is carried out regularly in one year is the initial basis for the implementation of the historical living museum.
Land regulations are made to organize life together in the community hoping that there are regulations that can provide legal certainty and resolve agrarian conflicts. However, in feudal times, the theory of royal property (vorstendomein) and royal property rights (vorsteneigendoormsrecht) said that all royal lands belonged to the king. Since the signing of the Giyanti treaty in 1755, the Sultan has made rules to regulate life in the communities enshrined in Rijksblad. Therefore, it is necessary to study land regulations during feudal times as part of the history of legal changes and developments in Yogyakarta society. Using the historical research method and the law approach through the Rijksblad, this research shows that even though the land regulations in the feudal era said that the king was the absolute owner of the land, the Sultan had made the rules.Abstrak: Pengaturan pertanahan dibuat untuk menata kehidupan bersama dalam masyarakat dengan harapan ada regulasi yang dapat memberikan kepastian hukum dan menyelesaikan konflik agraria. Namun, pada zaman feodal teori kepemilikan kerajaan (vorstendomein) dan hak milik kerajaan (vorsteneigendoormsrecht) mengatakan bahwa semua tanah kerajaan adalah milik raja. Sejak penandatanganan perjanjian Giyanti pada tahun 1755, Sultan telah membuat aturan untuk mengatur kehidupan masyarakat yang diabadikan di Rijksblad. Oleh karena itu, perlu dikaji regulasi pertanahan pada masa feodal sebagai bagian dari sejarah perubahan dan perkembangan hukum di masyarakat Yogyakarta. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian sejarah dan pendekatan hukum melalui Rijksblad, penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa meskipun peraturan pertanahan pada zaman feodal menyatakan bahwa raja adalah pemilik mutlak atas tanah, namun yang dibuat oleh Sultan adalah peraturannya.Â
<p class="abstrak">This research examines why local identity building was conducted in Osing village, Banyuwangi Regency, East Java, and how this identity was initiated and invested by actors who have power using Islamic political identity. To respond to these questions, this research used the historical method by utilizing primary and secondary sources, such as official archive in form of decrees, interview with historical actors, and various references such as books, journals, and newspapers. This research findings are the following: Osing’s identity was a deliberate blueprint and not a natural continuity. This construction involved cultural practitioners, journalists, artists, intellectuals, traditional figures, and national administrators. Osing’s identity construction, transformation, negotiation, and mobility are the site of the contention of various interest. The attempt of creating a sympathetic and caring reputation of Osing culture represented by almost all of Banyuwangi regent continued from the New Order era until the post-Reformation era, despite various paradigm shifts. This needs to be interpreted as efforts to build identity and not just to eliminate the stigma attached. It has had an impact on political support and legitimacy in Banyuwangi, especially Osing Kemiren Village.</p>
This article discusses two doctors who were directors at Kudus Hospital, Cornelis van Proosdij, and Loekmono Hadi. Both are government doctors, but both come from different colleges. Van Proosdij is a doctor who graduated from a European university. In contrast, Loekmono graduated from the School tot Opleiding Van Indische Artsen (STOVIA) in the Dutch East Indies, which is considered a different degree. Both also have other characteristics; Van Proosdij is attached to his colonialism, while Loekmono is classified as a nationalist. By using the historical method, this research uses a lot of archival sources and newspaper news published at that time. Specifically related to Loekmono, his research is also equipped with interviews with his children, so the data is more extensive, and the review is longer. The results of this study indicate that these two figures, although their characteristics are different, are still loved by the community. Another similarity is that both of them are victims of the political situation.Keywords: Hospital, Kudus Regency, Proosdij, Loekmono Hadi, Colonialists, Nationalists. Artikel ini membahas tentang dua orang dokter yang menjabat sebagai direktur di RS Kudus, Cornelis van Proosdij dan Loekmono Hadi. Keduanya adalah dokter pemerintah, tetapi keduanya berasal dari perguruan tinggi yang berbeda. Van Proosdij adalah seorang dokter lulusan universitas Eropa. Sebaliknya, Loekmono lulus dari School tot Opleiding Van Indische Artsen (STOVIA) di Hindia Belanda, yang dianggap berbeda gelar. Keduanya juga memiliki karakteristik lain; Van Proosdij lekat dengan kolonialismenya, sedangkan Loekmono tergolong nasionalis. Dengan menggunakan metode sejarah, penelitian ini banyak menggunakan sumber arsip dan berita surat kabar yang terbit pada masa itu. Khusus terkait Loekmono, penelitiannya juga dilengkapi dengan wawancara dengan anak-anaknya, sehingga datanya lebih luas, dan penelaahannya lebih panjang. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kedua tokoh ini walaupun memiliki sifat yang berbeda, tetap digandrungi oleh masyarakat. Kesamaan lainnya adalah keduanya sama-sama menjadi korban situasi politik.Kata Kunci: Rumah Sakit Kabupaten Kudus, Proosdij, Loekmono Hadi, Penjajah, Nasionalis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.