We review the utility of serum anticholinergic activity (SAA) as a peripheral marker of anticholinergic activity (AA) in the central nervous system (CAA). We hypothesize that the compensatory mechanisms of the cholinergic system do not contribute to SAA if their system is intact and that if central cholinergic system deteriorates alone in conditions such as Alzheimer's disease or Lewy body dementia, CAA and SAA are caused by way of hyperactivity of inflammatory system and SAA is a marker of the anticholinergic burden in CNS. Taking into account the diurnal variations in the plasma levels of corticosteroids, which are thought to affect SAA, it should be measured at noon or just afterward.

We have previously proposed a hypothesis in which we argue that anticholinergic activity (AA) appears endogenously in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Acetylcholine (ACh) controls both cognitive function and inflammation. Consequently, when the downregulation of ACh reaches critical levels, the inflammatory system is upregulated and proinflammatory cytokines with AA appear. However, factors other than downregulation of ACh can produce AA; even if ACh downregulation does not reach critical levels, AA can still appear if one of these other AA-producing factors is added. These factors can include neurocognitive disorders other than AD, such as delirium and Lewy body disease (LBD). In delirium, ACh downregulation fails to reach critical levels, but AA appears due to the use of medicines, physical illnesses or mental stress (termed ‘AA inserts'). In LBD, we speculate that AA appears endogenously, even in the absence of severe cognitive dysfunction, for 2 reasons. One reason is that patterns of ACh deterioration are different in LBD from those in AD, with synergistic actions between amyloid and α-synuclein thought to cause additional or severe symptoms that accelerate the disease course. The second reason is that AA occurs through disinhibition by reduced cortisol levels that result from severe autonomic parasympathetic dysfunction in LBD.

In this article, we review and repropose our hypothesis of the endogenous appearance of anticholinergic activity (AA) in Alzheimer's disease (AD). First, we introduce our previous articles and speculate that, because acetylcholine (ACh) regulates both cognitive function and inflammation, downregulation of this neurotransmitter causes upregulation of the inflammatory system. AA then appears endogenously with the production of cytokines and the downregulation of ACh in AD. To support our hypothesis, we present a female AD patient whose AA was considered to occur endogenously through her AD pathology. Her serum anticholinergic activity (SAA) was positive at her first visit to our memory clinic, was negative at the 1-year and 2-year follow-up visits, and had become positive again by 3 years. We speculate that the initial positive SAA was related to her AD pathology plus mental stress, and that her SAA at 3 years was related to her AD pathology only. Consequently, we believe that 2 patterns of SAA positivity (and therefore AA) exist. One occurs when the downregulation of ACh reaches a critical level, and the other occurs with the addition of some other factor such as medication, induced illness or mental stress that causes AA to affect AD pathology. Finally, we consider the pharmacotherapy of AD based on the proposed hypothesis and conclude that cholinesterase inhibitors can be used to prevent rapid disease progression, whereas N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists should be reserved for the treatment of AD that is already in a stage of rapid progression. We also propose a staging schema for patients with AD.

In this article, we review the downregulation of acetylcholinergic activity in schizophrenia and discuss the similarity and difference between Alzheimer's disease (AD) and schizophrenia in terms of acetylcholine (ACh) and anticholinergic activity (AA); then, we propose the use of cognition-enhancing therapy for schizophrenia. As ACh regulates an inflammatory system, when the cholinergic system is downregulated to a critical level, the inflammatory system is activated. We consider the possibility that AA appears endogenously in AD and accelerates AD pathology. This hypothesis can also be applied to schizophrenia. In fact, even before the onset of the disorder, in the prodromal phase of schizophrenia, cognitive dysfunction exists, and antibodies against astrocyte muscarinic-1 and muscarinic-2 receptors are present in the serum of patients with the paranoid type of schizophrenia. Then we noted that the prodromal phase in schizophrenia might correspond to the mild stage in AD and the acute phase to moderate stage concerning AA. We also think that we should enhance cognition in schizophrenia even in the prodromal phase because as mentioned above, downregulation of ACh is prominent in schizophrenia even in the prodromal phase.

We previously proposed the hypothesis of endogenous anticholinergic activity (AA) in Alzheimer's disease (AD). According to this hypothesis, the downregulation of acetylcholine seen in AD is associated with upregulation/hyperactivity of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR). The hyperactivation of NMDAR then induces inflammation, which, in turn, causes AA to appear endogenously. Based on this hypothesis, we commented that cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) are ‘preventative' therapy for AD and NMDAR antagonists are the true ‘treatment' for AD. We also noted that ChEIs, such as donepezil, could treat delirium. Moreover, we proposed measuring serum anticholinergic activity in patients, particularly AD patients, in out-of-hospital pharmacies to monitor the anticholinergic burden for targeted treatment.

Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) are not allowed to be prescribed in combination, which means that we need to select 1 of 3 ChEIs for use in a patient with Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, there is no quantitative analysis on the differences between these agents. In this article, we propose that plasma cholinesterase activity (pChE) could be used as the standard for differentiating between rivastigmine (Riv) and donepezil (Don) in the management of AD. To date, we have treated 6 patients with Riv 18 mg and 5 patients with Don 5 mg. The pChE is related to low-grade inflammation associated with AD, diabetes mellitus and lipid metabolic dysfunction. Moreover, low pChE is related to liver dysfunction. The pChE must be kept under control. We speculated that Riv is the most appropriate therapy for patients with relatively high pChE, whereas Don is best reserved for those AD patients with relatively low pChE.

We report a case of a 54-year-old woman presenting with amnesia, apathy, work-related difficulties and mental stress. At presentation, her Mini-Mental State Examination score was 27 and her serum anticholinergic activity (SAA) was positive without medication or recent physical illnesses. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging revealed mild atrophy of the frontal and temporal lobes, with a relatively intact hippocampus. Consequently, we diagnosed mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease and prescribed a cholinesterase inhibitor (donepezil, 10 mg/day); her SAA fully disappeared and clinical symptoms partially resolved. Addition of duloxetine coupled with environmental adjustments caused her cognitive function to return to a normal level, so we diagnosed pseudodementia due to depression. In this case, we believe that the simultaneous cholinergic burden and mental stress led to positive SAA, which made it reasonable to prescribe a cholinesterase inhibitor to ameliorate the associated acetylcholine hypoactivity. We believe that it is essential to recognize the importance of prescribing a cholinesterase inhibitor for specific patients, even those with pseudodementia, to control their clinical symptoms. Moreover, SAA might be a useful biomarker for identifying this subgroup of patients. We propose that anticholinergic activity appears endogenously in mood disorders (depression and bipolar disorder) and set out our rationalization for this hypothesis.

We reported a procedure of serum anticholinergic activity (SAA) measurement and the reliability and reproducibility of the receptor binding assay, and we also described the usefulness of SAA measurement reflecting the anticholinergic activity (AA) in the central nervous system (CNS). According to the results of a 10 times repeated measurement of standard atropine binding, the relative error was between -5.5 and +3.7%, and we considered that measurement of SAA in our studies is accurate and validated. Downregulation of acetylcholine activates inflammation in both CNS and peripheral tissue, which causes AA in both sites. Therefore, changes of AA in the CNS link with SAA in the peripheral system even if a substance having AA does not penetrate through the blood-brain barrier. Then we redescribe issues that require attention in the measurement of SAA. It is generally defined that any SAA greater than the detection limit of a quantitative atropine equivalent level (≥1.95 nM in our study) is positive. According to previous studies, SAA is considered to be positive when its atropine equivalent is ≥1.95 nM and undetectable when this is <1.95 nM. Nevertheless, as a low SAA can act as AA in the CNS, we should assume that SAA might also be positive if its marker concentration is between 0 and 1.95 nM. In addition, SAA should be measured around 11 a.m. or somewhat later because of the diurnal rhythm of cortisol in humans.