Pot experiments are often performed to assess plant physiological traits and relationships among growth traits under controlled environments. However, the reliability of pot studies for predicting the growth and performance of trees in the field has rarely been rigorously assessed. We evaluated the suitability of pot experiments for predicting field performance, measured as shoot biomass production, by investigating determinants of growth in hybrid willows (Salix spp.) grown under various environmental conditions in the field, and by comparing the data with the results from a corresponding pot study. Biomass production in six hybrid willow clones, bred for use as bio-fuels, was assessed in three field trials located in central and southeastern Sweden throughout the first 3-year cutting cycle. The determinants of biomass productivity, measured as biomass allocation and nitrogen (N) economy, were identified in one of the field trials. Key traits for shoot biomass production in the field were total leaf area and total amount of N; plant N losses by shed leaves were only partly controlled by leaf-litter N concentration. These key traits were also obtained from the pot study and related to shoot biomass production and abscission-leaf N loss in the field. Total leaf area and total N pool of plants grown in pot experiments were good predictors of long-term biomass production in the field, whereas shoot biomass production, specific leaf area and tissue N concentration of pot-grown plants were less suitable as predictors of field performance. Relationships between the key traits and shoot biomass production were clone-specific, indicating the need for analysis of growth traits at the clone level if field performance of trees is to be evaluated based on data from pot studies. Nutrient loss components are important for tree performance in the long term and evaluations of nutrient loss characteristics at the individual-tree level should focus on nutrient pools lost rather than on nutrient concentrations in abscised plant parts.
Willow (Salix spp.) short-rotation coppice is commercially grown to produce lignocellulosic biomass to meet renewable bioenergy demands. Most commercial willow coppices are grown in stands of a single genotype, but biomass productivity may be greater in mixed communities, and the productivity in mixed communities may depend on the specific genotypes involved. We assessed the biomass production of four different Salix genotypes ("Bj€ orn," "Jorr," "Loden," "Tora") grown without additional nutrient fertilization during one cutting cycle at three locations in Europe (Uppsala in Sweden, Rostock and Freiburg in Germany) in plots of pure and mixed communities. We evaluated (i) the effect of genotype diversity on shoot biomass productivity, including the evidence for complementarity and selection effects; (ii) the influence of individual genotypes on mixed community productivity; and (iii) the productivity of individual genotypes in response to pure vs. mixed culture. Mean shoot biomass production after the first cutting cycle decreased in the order Rostock (8.7 Mg ha À1 ) > Freiburg (6.9 Mg ha À1 ) > Uppsala (5.7 Mg ha À1 ), with values similar to those for other nonfertilized willow stands after the first growth cycle. Consistently across all three locations, increasing genotype diversity did not significantly affect shoot biomass production. Using Bayesian statistics, the addition of the genotypes "Jorr" and "Loden" was predicted to enhance shoot biomass production, while "Tora" and "Bj€ orn" are more likely to reduce shoot biomass production in mixed communities. In addition, we found evidence for a negative selection effect due to the genotype "Tora"performing better in mixed than in pure communities in two of the sites (Freiburg, Uppsala). In conclusion, our results imply that increasing genetic richness has no negative effect on productivity and that there is a potential to design site-specific genotype mixtures of short-rotation coppice promoting both high genetic diversity and high biomass production.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.