No abstract

Severe drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains a major safety issue due to its frequency of occurrence, idiosyncratic nature, poor prognosis, and diverse underlying mechanisms. Numerous experimental approaches have been published to improve human DILI prediction with modest success. A retrospective analysis of 125 drugs (70 = most-DILI, 55 = no-DILI) from the Food and Drug Administration Liver Toxicity Knowledge Base was used to investigate DILI prediction based on consideration of human exposure alone or in combination with mechanistic assays of hepatotoxic liabilities (cytotoxicity, bile salt export pump inhibition, or mitochondrial inhibition/uncoupling). Using this dataset, human plasma Cmax,total ≥ 1.1 µM alone distinguished most-DILI from no-DILI compounds with high sensitivity/specificity (80/73%). Accounting for human exposure improved the sensitivity/specificity for each assay and helped to derive predictive safety margins. Compounds with plasma Cmax,total ≥ 1.1 µM and triple liabilities had significantly higher odds ratio for DILI than those with single/dual liabilities. Using this approach, a subset of recent pharmaceuticals with evidence of liver injury during clinical development was recognized as potential hepatotoxicants. In summary, plasma Cmax,total ≥ 1.1 µM along with multiple mechanistic liabilities is a major driver for predictions of human DILI potential. In applying this approach during drug development the challenge will be generating accurate estimates of plasma Cmax,total at efficacious doses in advance of generating true exposure data from clinical studies. In the meantime, drug candidates with multiple hepatotoxic liabilities should be deprioritized, since they have the highest likelihood of causing DILI in case their efficacious plasma Cmax,total in humans is higher than anticipated.

The genesis of any toxicological or safety outcome is multifactorial and complex; for this reason, it can be difficult for drug discovery projects to factor the avoidance of toxicity outcomes into their target design. A focus on readily measurable parameters from high-throughput in vitro assays (e.g., primary potency, clearance) is easier to handle and have become the mainstays of drug discovery projects. However, the fundamental origins of adverse safety or toxicity findings can be considered as deriving from four parameters, all of which are in the control of the drug designer. These can be described as primary pharmacology, off target pharmacology, the presence of a defined structural fragment that can be associated with adverse outcomes and the overall physicochemical properties of the molecule that may predispose it to adverse outcomes. In the drug discovery community, there has been recognition for many years of the influence of physicochemical drug properties (in particular lipophilicity) on the toxicology profile of compounds, and recent research is now beginning to quantify that risk in a probabilistic sense. This review focuses on the overall properties of classes of molecules that are associated with an increased probability of adverse outcomes in in vivo studies.

Drug-induced liver injury is a major issue of concern and has led to the withdrawal of a significant number of marketed drugs. An understanding of structure-activity relationships (SARs) of chemicals can make a significant contribution to the identification of potential toxic effects early in the drug development process and aid in avoiding such problems. This process can be supported by the use of existing toxicity data and mechanistic understanding of the biological processes for related compounds. In the published literature, this information is often spread across diverse sources and can be varied and unstructured in quality and content. The current work has explored whether it is feasible to collect and use such data for the development of new SARs for the hepatotoxicity endpoint and expand upon the limited information currently available in this area. Reviews of hepatotoxicity data were used to build a structure-searchable database, which was analyzed to identify chemical classes associated with an adverse effect on the liver. Searches of the published literature were then undertaken to identify additional supporting evidence, and the resulting information was incorporated into the database. This collated information was evaluated and used to determine the scope of the SARs for each class identified. Data for over 1266 chemicals were collected, and SARs for 38 classes were developed. The SARs have been implemented as structural alerts using Derek for Windows (DfW), a knowledge-based expert system, to allow clearly supported and transparent predictions. An evaluation exercise performed using a customized DfW version 10 knowledge base demonstrated an overall concordance of 56% and specificity and sensitivity values of 73% and 46%, respectively. The approach taken demonstrates that SARs for complex endpoints can be derived from the published data for use in the in silico toxicity assessment of new compounds.

It has long been recognised that the ability to predict the metabolic fate of a chemical substance and the potential toxicity of either the parent compound or its metabolites are important in novel drug design. The popularity of using computer models as an aid in this area has grown considerably in recent years. LHASA Limited has been developing knowledge-based expert systems for toxicity and metabolism prediction in collaboration with industry and regulatory authorities. These systems, DEREK, StAR and METEOR, use rules to describe the relationship between chemical structure and either toxicity in the case of DEREK and StAR, or metabolic fate in the case of METEOR. The rule refinement process for DEREK often involves assessing the predictions for a novel set of compounds and comparing them to their biological assay results as a measure of the system's performance. For example, 266 non-congeneric chemicals from the National Toxicology Program database have been processed through the DEREK mutagenicity knowledge base and the predictions compared to their Salmonella typhimurium mutagenicity data. Initially, 81 of 114 mutagens (71%) and 117 of 152 non-mutagens (77%) were correctly identified. Following further knowledge base development, the number of correctly identified mutagens has increased to 96 (84%). Further work on improving the predictive capabilities of DEREK, StAR and METEOR is in progress.

No abstract

The identification of phospholipidosis (PPL) during preclinical testing in animals is a recognized problem in the pharmaceutical industry. Depending on the intended indication and dosing regimen, PPL can delay or stop development of a compound in the drug discovery process. Therefore, for programs and projects where a PPL finding would have adverse impact on the success of the project, it would be desirable to be able to rapidly identify and screen out those compounds with the potential to induce PPL as early as possible. Currently, electron microscopy is the gold standard method for identifying phospholipidosis, but it is low-throughput and resource-demanding. Therefore, a low-cost, high-throughput screening strategy is required to overcome these limitations and be applicable in the drug discovery cycle. A recent publication by Ploemen et al. (Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 2004, 55, 347-55) describes a method using the computed physicochemical properties pKa and ClogP as part of a simple calculation to determine a compound's potential to induce PPL. We have evaluated this method using a set of 201 compounds, both public and proprietary, with known in vivo PPL-inducing ability and have found the overall concordance to be 75%. We have proposed simple modifications to the model rules, which improve the model's concordance to 80%. Finally, we describe the development of a Bayesian model using the same compound set and found its overall concordance to be 83%.

Improving the prediction of chemical toxicity is a goal common to both environmental health research and pharmaceutical drug development. To improve safety detection assays, it is critical to have a reference set of molecules with well-defined toxicity annotations for training and validation purposes. Here, we describe a collaboration between safety researchers at Pfizer and the research team at the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD) to text mine and manually review a collection of 88 629 articles relating over 1 200 pharmaceutical drugs to their potential involvement in cardiovascular, neurological, renal and hepatic toxicity. In 1 year, CTD biocurators curated 2 54 173 toxicogenomic interactions (1 52 173 chemical–disease, 58 572 chemical–gene, 5 345 gene–disease and 38 083 phenotype interactions). All chemical–gene–disease interactions are fully integrated with public CTD, and phenotype interactions can be downloaded. We describe Pfizer’s text-mining process to collate the articles, and CTD’s curation strategy, performance metrics, enhanced data content and new module to curate phenotype information. As well, we show how data integration can connect phenotypes to diseases. This curation can be leveraged for information about toxic endpoints important to drug safety and help develop testable hypotheses for drug–disease events. The availability of these detailed, contextualized, high-quality annotations curated from seven decades’ worth of the scientific literature should help facilitate new mechanistic screening assays for pharmaceutical compound survival. This unique partnership demonstrates the importance of resource sharing and collaboration between public and private entities and underscores the complementary needs of the environmental health science and pharmaceutical communities.Database URL: http://ctdbase.org/