The forcings behind the rapid increase in mass loss from the Greenland Ice Sheet in the early 2000s (ref. 1) are still debated. It is unclear whether the mass loss will continue in the near future and, if so, at what rate. These uncertainties are a consequence of our limited understanding of mechanisms regulating ice-sheet variability and the response of fast-flowing outlet glaciers to climate variability. In southeast Greenland, Helheim Glacier, one of the regions largest glaciers, thinned, accelerated and retreated during the period 2003-2005 (ref. 4) and although it has since slowed down and readvanced 9 , it has still not returned to its pre-acceleration flow rates. It has been suggested that warming 8,10 and/or inflow variability 11,12 of the nearby subsurface ocean currents triggered the acceleration, but to establish a causal relationship between glacier and climate variability, long-term records are needed. Here we present three high-resolution (1-3 years per sample) sedimentary records from Sermilik Fjord ( Fig. 1 and Supplementary Information) that capture the 2001-2005 episode of mass loss, and use them to reconstruct the calving variability of Helheim Glacier over the past 120 years. Next, this record is compared with records of climate indices.

No abstract

No abstract

[1] On the basis of 52 sediment cores, analyzed and dated at high resolution, the paleoceanography and climate of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) were reconstructed in detail for the Fram Strait and the eastern and central Arctic Ocean. Sediment composition and stable isotope data suggest three distinct paleoenvironments: (1) a productive region in the eastern to central Fram Strait and along the northern Barents Sea continental margin characterized by Atlantic Water advection, frequent open water conditions, and occasional local meltwater supply and iceberg calving from the Barents Sea Ice Sheet; (2) an intermediate region in the southwestern Eurasian Basin (up to 84-85°N) and the western Fram Strait characterized by subsurface Atlantic Water advection and recirculation, a moderately high planktic productivity, and a perennial ice cover that breaks up only occasionally; and (3) a central Arctic region (north of 85°N in the Eurasian Basin) characterized by a lowsalinity surface water layer and a thick ice cover that strongly reduces bioproduction and bulk sedimentation rates. Although the total inflow of Atlantic Water into the Arctic Ocean may have been reduced during the LGM, its impact on ice coverage and halocline structure in the Fram Strait and southwestern Eurasian Basin was strong.