"Farouchement partisans" de la création d'un musée de l'histoire de l'immigration en France, Nicolas Bancel et Pascal Blanchard exposent ici les motifs qui les opposent à sa localisation au sein du palais de la Porte Dorée. Ils montrent comment l'ouverture de la CNHI s'inscrirait dans un contexte général d'élaboration d'une "politique de la mémoire" qui ferait passer à la trappe la dimension coloniale ou qui, à tout le moins, en édulcorerait la portée.
When he ran for president in 2007 Nicolas Sarkozy promised to build a museum of French history. He declared that he was troubled by the lack of a coherent account of the nation’s great moments and great heroes. On being elected, he started the planning process, finally settling on the Hôtel de Soubise, part of the Archives nationales, as the site of the future Maison de l’histoire de France. Although his project was supported by a certain number of intellectuals, many university scholars, especially the historians, raised strong objections to a concept that returned to the old Third Republic civic history in the style of Ernest Lavisse. The future museum was to offer visitors old-fashioned narrative history of male achievements, with no account taken of new insights that women’s, gender, social, cultural, colonial and immigration history have added to any discussion of what France is or might be. It rejects the idea that there have been, and can be, many ways of being French. The critics of the museum project deplored the instrumentalisation of the nation’s past – one of several such presidential ventures – for short-term political gain. The strike of archive employees, which lasted for several months, scuttled that site as the future home of the history museum. The story is not finished. The discussion of the presidential museum initiative is placed in a larger context in which increased economic neo-liberalism, greater state interventions at home and overseas, and the propagation of a nostalgic-conservative vision of the nation’s past reinforce each other, even as they coexist in uneasy union.
L'histoire de l'élaboration d'un imaginaire colonial en France (de la fin du XIXe siècle aux années soixante), permet de lire différemment les discours actuels de stigmatisation des immigrés originaires d'Afrique noire et du Maghreb. L'appréhension des phénomènes d'immigration et des populations immigrées semble , en effet profondément liée à ce passé, qui a imprégné pendant près d'un siècle la culture occidentale, sans qu'une véritable interrogation critique ait été menée depuis les décolonisations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.