To investigate the hypothesis of a functional coupling between the stomatognathic motor apparatus and the muscles of other body districts, as well as between occlusal conditions and neuromuscular performance, two groups of men (age range 20-26 years), with either normal occlusion (14 men) or malocclusion (15 men), sustained with their dominant arm a dumbbell weighing 80% of their maximum while maintaining different jaw positions: mouth open, without dental contact; mouth close, with light dental contact; maximum voluntary clench; maximum voluntary clench on two cotton rolls positioned on the posterior mandibular teeth; maximum voluntary clench on one cotton roll positioned on the right/left-side posterior mandibular teeth. Surface electromyography (EMG) of the biceps brachii muscle was performed, and the endurance time, mean root mean square (rms) potential, and mean median power frequency were computed. The mean potential and median power frequency were also computed for 2-s windows, and values as a function of time were interpolated by a linear regression analysis. Data were compared between groups and trials by using a factorial analysis of variance. The malocclusion group subjects could perform the exercise for a longer time span than the normal occlusion individuals (P < 0.005). During this endurance time their biceps brachii muscles contracted with different patterns: on average, in the malocclusion group they had a larger EMG amplitude (P < 0.005), and a shift of the power spectrum toward lower frequencies (P < 0.005). The factor 'jaw position' was significant only for the endurance time (P < 0.005). In both groups, the longest endurance time was found in the 'clench' trial, while the shortest in the 'right-side bite' trial. In conclusion, a morphologically altered occlusion does not always worsen the muscular performance of other body districts, and the use of occlusal supports (cotton rolls) is not always beneficial.
The size and shape of paired structures differ in the left and right sides of the body. Shape characteristics should be analyzed separately from size to supply information about the normal variations of human organs. In the present study, the within-subject normal symmetry of footprint shape and size was analyzed from a mathematical standpoint. On the standardized left and right footprints of 46 healthy adults (23 women and 23 men; 19-26 years old), the outline of each foot excluding the toes was identified and its shape was quantified independently from size by the elliptic Fourier analysis. The symmetry in shape was quantified on an intra-subject basis by calculating a morphologic distance D between the mathematical reconstructions of the left and right footprints of each subject. Symmetry in size was assessed by the right-to-left area ratio and found to be very good for all subjects; it ranged from 0.948 to 1.049. The subjects were also grouped by sex, and mean values were calculated. Within-subject symmetry in the footprint shape appeared high, with morphologic distances ranging between 8.94 and 2.66 in men and between 7.15 and 3.09 in women. No consistent associations between footprint symmetry and age, body height and weight, or shoe size were found. On average, women had more symmetric size-standardized footprints than did men (women: mean 4.57, SD 1.14; men: mean 5.46, SD 1.7; p < 0.05). Mean size-independent shapes of male and female left and right footprints were also calculated. Together with the analysis of individual asymmetry, they could be used for the quantitative diagnosis of borderline patients.
13 black-belt karateka performed two different standardized counter-offensive techniques. The trajectories of selected body landmarks were studied by using a computerized image analyzer that allows a 3-dimensional reconstruction of standardized movements. The repeatability of both karate techniques was quantified for each participant. Analysis confirmed that more experienced karateka obtained the best repeatability, as already demonstrated in a preliminary study conducted with a smaller sample of less experienced participants.
The aim of the study was to quantify the repeatability of the displacement of selected body landmarks while performing two different basic karate attacks. Seven karateka (three men, four women) with different levels of training and knowledge of karate were filmed with an optoelectronic computerized instrument (sampling rate 100 Hz) that allows the three-dimensional reconstruction of the movements of selected body landmarks. Thirteen landmarks (head, hips, upper and lower limbs) were analyzed while performing 10 repetitions each of choku-tsuki (straight punch) and oi-tsuki (lunge punch). For each karateka and punch, the average time of execution was calculated, and the standard deviations of each of the three spatial coordinates x, y, z were computed for each landmark. A total standard deviation of the single karateka and punch was also calculated. For all karateka, the execution of oi-tsuki took longer than the execution of choku-tsuki. For both punches and almost all landmarks, the largest repeatability (smallest standard deviation) was found in the vertical direction, while the smallest was found in the anteroposterior direction (direction of movement). In all karateka, oi-tsuki had a total standard deviation about 3 to 6 times larger than that measured during the performance of choku-tsuki. On average, women had a larger repeatability than men. The method employed in the current study allowed the quantitative analysis of the repeatability of two basic attacks in Shotokan karate by using a landmark based approach. The method could offer valuable help to karateka during training indicating which parts of the body do not repeat a selected movement with sufficient accuracy, thus assisting in the achievement of the most correct body form.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.