No abstract

No abstract

Dapoxetine hydrochloride (DAP) and Tadalafil (TAD) were separated and determined quantitatively using a validated green high-performance thin layer chromatographic (HPTLC) method in their binary mixtures either as raw materials or in pharmaceutical formulations. The concentration ranges were 0.1–1.6 and 0.2–2.5 μg/band for dapoxetine and tadalafil, respectively, with accuracies of 98.93% ± 0.62 and 99.26% ± 1.39, respectively. Silica gel HPTLC F254 plates were used to carry out the separation. The mobile phase used was a mixture of ethanol–ethyl acetate (1:9 by volume), which is environmentally green and harmless. Densitometric scanning with UV detector was used to detect the separated peaks at 222 nm. ICH guidelines were followed to validate the suggested method, and the results prove that they can be used for regular analysis in quality control laboratories with compatible results.

A novel ecofriendly, cost and time saving high‐performance thin‐layer chromatographic method was developed and validated for simultaneous determination of metoclopramide, ergotamine, caffeine, and paracetamol in bulk and pharmaceutical formulation. The separation was carried out on silica gel plates, using ethyl acetate:ethanol:ammonia (9:1:0.1, v/v/v) as a developing system. Ultraviolet detection was carried out at 272 nm. The resulting retention times were 0.15, 0.36, 0.49, and 0.74 min for metoclopramide, ergotamine, caffeine, and paracetamol, respectively. The greenness profile assessment was achieved to the proposed method to evaluate its greenness characters to the environment with acceptable results. Validation parameters were checked according to International Conference of Harmonization guidelines to achieve the international requirements for quality control analysis of the proposed drugs.

Two green, simple, and accurate chromatographic methods were developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of omeprazole and aspirin mixture in the presence of salicylic acid, a major impurity of aspirin. Method A is a reversed‐phase ultra‐high‐performance liquid chromatography; the separation was performed on a C18 column, with a mobile phase composed of ethanol:0.1% aqueous solution of triethylamine acidified with orthophosphoric acid (pH 3) (30:70, v/v) at 0.15 mL/min flow rate and 230 nm. Omeprazole, aspirin, and aspirin impurity retention times were 7.47, 4.40, and 5.13 min, respectively. Good linearity was achieved in the concentration ranges of 5–80, 5–85, and 3–50 μg/mL for the three mentioned components, respectively. Method B is thin‐layer chromatography (TLC) where silica gel TLC F254 plates were utilized to achieve separation using ethanol:ethyl acetate (2:8, v/v) as a developing system at 240 nm. The resulted Rf values were 0.83, 0.65, and 0.23 for omeprazole, aspirin, and impurity, respectively. The concentration ranges of 0.1–3 μg/band for the three drugs showed good linearity. The proposed methods are eco‐friendly and greener when compared to the already reported method (Microchemical Journal, 152, 104350). This is the first use of TLC method for the determination of the three drugs. International Council for Harmonization (ICH) guidelines were followed to ensure the validity of developed methods.

Background: Dapoxetine (DAP) is a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, and Tadalafil (TAD) is a phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor. Both are coformulated as tablets called Erectafil® for treatment of erectile ejaculation. Objective: DAP and TAD were analyzed in their binary mixtures and pharmaceutical formulations using two multivariate calibration chemometric models. Methods: Partial least-squares (PLS) and linear support vector regression (SVR) models were applied using two factor-four level experimental design and UV-spectrophotometric data. They were compared to each other, and their advantages and disadvantages were discussed. Results: The developed methods succeeded to determine DAP and TAD in different ratios with good results regarding International Conference on Harmonization guidelines. Linearity ranges were 2–15 μg/mL and 3–30 μg/mL for DAP and TAD, respectively, with good accuracy of 100 ± 0.37 for DAP and 100 ± 0.8 for TAD regarding PLS model and 100.04 ± 0.32 for DAP and 99.89 ± 0.77 for TAD regarding SVR model. Good precision values of 0.787 for DAP and 0.793 for TAD regarding PLS model and 1.105 for DAP and 0.930 for TAD regarding SVR model were obtained. The two models were applied on the dosage forms and statistically compared with the published HPLC method with no significant difference regarding accuracy and precision. Conclusions: The two models can be utilized for routine analysis and QC of DAP and TAD in their bulk and pharmaceutical formulations. The SVR model gives better results and generalization ability than those of the PLS model regarding accuracy and prediction error, while the latter is better for being simpler and faster.

No abstract

No abstract