Background: Although respecting patient rights is crucial in the provision of quality care, patient rights and advocacy are often missed in nursing practice. Study aim: to assess the nurse interns' perception regarding patients' rights and advocacy.Research design: Adescriptive design was used. Subjects: study was conducted in the four Ain Shams University Hospitals on 111 nurse interns. Methods: A self-administered questionnaire with 2 tools for patient bill of rights and patient advocacy was used in data collection. The fieldwork lasted from February to April 2021. Results: Nurse interns' age ranged between 21 and 27 years, median 23.0 years, with almost equal gender distribution. Overall, 66.7% of the nurse interns had high perception of patient rights, and 80.2% had high perception of patient advocacy rights. A significant positive correlation was found between the scores of perceptions of patient rights and of advocacy (r=0.565). Female gender and awareness of the patient right bill were positive predictors of the patient right perception score, while for the advocacy score, female gender, family size, and previous training were positive predictors and age and night shift work were negative predictors. Conclusion : Nurse interns' perception of patient rights is suboptimal, while their perception of advocacy is higher, and both are positively correlated. Recommendations :Nursing internship program shouid give more emphasis to the area of patient rights and advocacy. The hospital administration should foster staff awareness of patient rights. Further research is proposed to explore the barriers that prevent nurses from advocating patients.
Background: Quality of Work Life (QWL) directly influences job satisfaction, productivity, and work engagement. It is essential for successful educational institutions. Aim of the study: To compare the QWL and work engagement among academic staff at two nursing faculties in a regional (A) and a capital-city (B) university. Subjects and Methods: This comparative cross-sectional research design was used to compare academic staff"s QWL and work engagement in nursing faculties. It included 82 academic staff from each one. A self-administered questionnaire with the Quality of Work Life Scale and Utrecht Work Engagement Scale was used to collect data. Fieldwork lasted from January to March 2021. Results: Participants from regional universities had more experience years (p=0.004), more singles (p=0.03), and rural residents (p<0.001). Regional university staff had lower QWL (12.2%) than capital-city university (52.4%), p<0.001, but had higher UWES scores (p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, working in a capitalcity university was a positive predictor of QWL, while it was a negative predictor of engagement score. Conclusion and Recommendations: There are significant differences in QWL and work engagement of academic staff between faculties of nursing in the capital city and regional universities. The work engagement is influenced by the QWL and staff income and training. Improving academic staff QWL with better work design would help them achieve their own and institutional goals with a better balance of their work/home life. The effectiveness of improving work design and context on academic staff work engagement, professional performance, and work happiness needs to be studied.
Background: Corona virus disease (COVID-19) is the latest global pandemic which impose an occupational risk to health care personnel, that can lead to deficit in performance and work engagement which as a key tool for patients' safety. Aim: The study aimed to assess the effect of educational program about COVID-19 on intern-nurses' performance and work engagement. Design: A quasi-experimental research design with pre-post test was used to conduct this study. Setting: The study was carried out in the different departments where intern-nurses were trained on their clinical training areas at
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.