Aims: The study objectives were to examine trends in prescription opioid (PO) injection and to assess its association with HCV seroconversion among injection drug users (IDUs), accounting for other risk factors.Design and Setting: A prospective cohort study of IDUs was carried out between 2004 and 2009 in Montreal, Canada.Participants and Measurements: 246 HCV-negative IDUs were included in this analysis. Semiannual visits included HCV antibody testing and an interview-administered questionnaire assessing risk behaviours. HCV incidence rate was calculated using the person-time method.Time-updated Cox regression models were conducted to examine predictors of HCV incidence.Findings: The proportion of IDUs reporting PO injection increased from 21% to 75% between 2004 and 2009 (p < 0.001). Of the 246 participants (81.6% male; mean age 34.5 years; mean follow-up time 23 months), 83 seroconverted to HCV (incidence rate: 17.9 per 100 person-years; 95% CI 14.3, 22.1). PO injectors were more likely to become infected if they did not use injection heroin (Adjusted Hazard Ratio (AHR): 2.9 (95% CI: 1.5, 5.5)), whereas the association was not statistically significant for participants who reported using both drugs (AHR: 1.2 (95%CI: 0.6, 2.3). Other independent predictors of HCV incidence were: cocaine injection, recent incarceration, and > 30 injections per month.Conclusion: PO injection has increased rapidly in recent years, and appears to be an important risk factor for HCV acquisition. Our results suggest that the risks related to PO injection may be conditioned by specific drug practices which differ from those of heroin users.

Starting in 2007, a 2-year study based on ethnographic methodology was carried out downtown Montréal, Canada. A thematic analysis of observational and interview-based notes was conducted. Illicit prescription opioid (PO) use was widespread among street-based participants. Injection was the main mode of PO administration observed among users. Some injection practices such as “doing a wash” could pose new challenges in terms of prevention of infections. More research is needed to examine the role of illicit PO use in the development of opiate addiction and to better understand drug-using contexts that put PO users at risk of infections. The study’s limitations are noted.

No abstract

Conclusion:The heterogeneity of consumption patterns supports the importance of offering an array of interventions aimed at problematic cocaine users. These should include the provision of clean injecting and smoking material, the promotion of safe sexual behaviours and the prevention of initiation to drug injection. In the absence of specific treatment, cocaine users should have access to primary health care services and addiction treatment based on innovative behavioral and pharmacological approaches.2

No abstract

Introduction and Aims: A study was undertaken to verify reports of an increasing presence of crack in downtown Montréal, and to investigate the influence of crack availability on current drug use patterns among street-based cocaine users. Design and Methods: The study combined both qualitative and quantitative methods. These included long-term intensive participant-observation carried out by an ethnographer familiar with the field and a survey. The ethnographic component involved observations and unstructured interviews with 64 street-based cocaine users. Sampling was based on a combination of snowballing and purposeful recruitment methods. For the survey, structured interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of 387 cocaine users attending HIV/HCV prevention programs, downtown Montréal. Results: A gradual shift has occurred in the last ten years, with the crack street market overtaking the powder cocaine street market. Although the data pointed to an increase in crack smoking, 54.5% of survey participants both smoked and injected cocaine. Drug market forces were major contributing factors to the observed modes of cocaine consumption. While the study focused primarily on cocaine users, it became apparent from the ethnographic fieldwork that prescription opioids (POs) were very present on the streets. According to the survey, 52.7% of participants consumed opioids, essentially POs, with 88% of them injecting these drugs. Discussion and Conclusions: Despite the increased availability of crack, injection is still present among cocaine users due at least in part to the concurrent increasing popularity of POs.

PM use practices showed several complementary functions that PM fulfill in a context of polydrug use. The soothing and stimulating effects of PM reinforce the patterns of drug use among participants, posing various risks including overdose, HIV/HCV transmission, PM dependence and accidents. The results highlight the need for clinicians to assess clients' substance use patterns when prescribing PM and to question PWUC about PM use. The findings also underline certain unmet service needs in relation to overdose, HIV/HCV and mental health prevention/treatment among cocaine users.

No abstract