The amount of masking exerted by one speech sound on another can be reduced by presenting the masker twice, from two different locations in the horizontal plane, with one of the presentations delayed to simulate an acoustical reflection. Three experiments were conducted on various aspects of this phenomenon. Experiment 1 varied the number of masking talkers from one to three and the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio from -12 to +4 dB. Evidence of masking release was found for every combination of these variables tested. For the most difficult conditions (multiple maskers and negative S/N) the amount of release was approximately 10 dB. Experiment 2 varied the timing of leading and lagging masker presentations over a broad range, to include shorter delay times where room reflections of speech are rarely noticed by listeners and longer delays where reflections can become disruptive. Substantial masking release was found for all of the shorter delay times tested, and negligible release was found at the longer delays. Finally, Experiment 3 used speech-spectrum noise as a masker and searched for possible energetic masking release as a function of the lead-lag time delay. Release of up to 4 dB was found whenever delays were 2 ms or less. No energetic masking release was found at longer delays.
The Woodworth model and formula for interaural time difference is frequently used as a standard in physiological and psychoacoustical studies of binaural hearing for humans and other animals. It is a frequency-independent, ray-tracing model of a rigid spherical head that is expected to agree with the high-frequency limit of an exact diffraction model. The predictions by the Woodworth model for antipodal ears and for incident plane waves are here compared with the predictions of the exact model as a function of frequency to quantify the discrepancy when the frequency is not high. In a second calculation, the Woodworth model is extended to arbitrary ear angles, both for plane-wave incidence and for finite point-source distance. The extended Woodworth model leads to different formulas in six different regions defined by ear angle and source distance. It is noted that the characteristic cusp in Woodworth's well-known function comes from ignoring the longer of the two paths around the head in circumstances when the longer path is actually important. This error can be readily corrected.
This paper reports the results of experiments performed in an effort to find a formulaic relationship between the interaural waveform coherence of a band of noise ␥ W and the interaural envelope coherence of the noise band ␥ E . An interdependence described by ␥ E = / 4+͑1− / 4͒͑␥ W ͒ 2.1 is found. This relationship holds true both in a computer experiment and for binaural measurements made in two rooms using a KEMAR manikin. Room measurements are used to derive a measure of reliability for the formula. Ultimately, a user who knows the waveform coherence can predict the envelope coherence with a small degree of uncertainty.
Informational masking of a target female talker by female distracters was measured with target and distracters presented from directly in front of the listener as a baseline condition. Next, it was found that if the distracters were also presented from directly in back of the listener, advanced or delayed by a few milliseconds with respect to the distracters in front, release from informational masking occurred. Release from informational masking was found for all delays within the Haas region of +/-50 ms, with peak release of about 3.5 dB. This peak occurred for a delay of +/-2 ms and it was shown to be the result of delay-and-add filtering. Release from energetic masking was also found, but only for delays of +/-0.5 ms or less.
The Woodworth model and formula for interaural time difference is frequently used as a standard in physiological and psychoacoustical studies of binaural hearing for humans and other animals. It is a frequency-independent, ray-tracing spherical head model that is expected to agree with an exact diffraction model in the high-frequency limit. The predictions by the Woodworth model for antipodal ears and for incident plane waves are compared with the predictions of the exact model as a function of frequency to quantify the discrepancy when the frequency is not high. In a second calculation, the Woodworth model is extended to arbitrary ear angles, both for plane-wave incidence and for finite point-source distance. This extended Woodworth model leads to different formulas in six different regions defined by ear angle and source distance. It is noted that the characteristic cusp in Woodworth's well-known function comes from ignoring the longer of the two paths around the head in circumstances when the longer path is actually important. This error can be readily corrected.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.