Metronidazole, the prototype nitroimidazole antimicrobial, was originally introduced to treat Trichomonas vaginalis, but is now used for the treatment of anaerobic and protozoal infections. The nitroimidazoles are bactericidal through toxic metabolites which cause DNA strand breakage. Resistance, both clinical and microbiological, has been described only rarely. Metronidazole given orally is absorbed almost completely, with bioavailability > 90% for tablets; absorption is unaffected by infection. Rectal and intravaginal absorption are 67 to 82%, and 20 to 56%, of the dose, respectively. Metronidazole is distributed widely and has low protein binding (< 20%). The volume of distribution at steady state in adults is 0.51 to 1.1 L/kg. Metronidazole reaches 60 to 100% of plasma concentrations in most tissues studied, including the central nervous system, but does not reach high concentrations in placental tissue. Metronidazole is extensively metabolised by the liver to 5 metabolites. The hydroxy metabolite has biological activity of 30 to 65% and a longer elimination half-life than the parent compound. The majority of metronidazole and its metabolites are excreted in urine and faeces, with less than 12% excreted unchanged in urine. The pharmacokinetics of metronidazole are unaffected by acute or chronic renal failure, haemodialysis, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, age, pregnancy or enteric disease. Renal dysfunction reduces the elimination of metronidazole metabolites; however, no toxicity has been documented and dosage alterations are unnecessary. Liver disease leads to a decreased clearance of metronidazole and dosage reduction is recommended. Recent pharmacodynamic studies of metronidazole have demonstrated activity for 12 to 24 hours after administration of metronidazole 1 g. The post-antibiotic effect of metronidazole extends beyond 3 hours after the concentration falls below the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The concentration-dependent bactericidal activity, prolonged half-life and sustained activity in plasma support the clinical evaluation of higher doses of metronidazole given less frequently. Metronidazole-containing regimens for Helicobacter pylori in combination with proton pump inhibitors demonstrate higher success rates than antimicrobial regimens alone. The pharmacokinetics of metronidazole in gastric fluid appear contradictory to these results, since omeprazole reduces peak drug concentration and area under the concentration-time curve for metronidazole and its hydroxy metabolite; however, concentrations remain above the MIC. Other members of this class include tinidazole, ornidazole and secnidazole. They are also well absorbed and distributed after oral administration. Their only distinguishing features are prolonged half-lives compared with metronidazole. The choice of nitroimidazole may be influenced by the longer administration intervals possible with other members of this class; however, metronidazole remains the predominant antimicrobial for anaerobic and protozoal infections.

The nitroimidazole antibiotic metronidazole has a limited spectrum of activity that encompasses various protozoans and most Gram-negative and Gram-positive anaerobic bacteria. Metronidazole has activity against protozoans like Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia lamblia and Trichomonas vaginalis, for which the drug was first approved as an effective treatment. Anaerobic bacteria which are typically sensitive are primarily Gram-negative anaerobes belonging to the Bacteroides and Fusobacterium spp. Gram-positive anaerobes such as peptostreptococci and Clostridia spp. are likely to test sensitive to metronidazole, but resistant isolates are probably encountered with greater frequency than with the Gram-negative anaerobes. Gardnerella vaginalis is a pleomorphic Gram-variable bacterial bacillus that is also susceptible to metronidazole. Helicobacter pylori has been strongly associated with gastritis and duodenal ulcers. Classic regimens for eradicating this pathogen have included metronidazole, usually with acid suppression medication plus bismuth and amoxicillin. The activity of metronidazole against anaerobic bowel flora has been used for prophylaxis and treatment of patients with Crohn's disease who might develop an infectious complication. Treatment of Clostridium difficile-induced pseudomembraneous colitis has usually been with oral metronidazole or vancomycin, but the lower cost and similar efficacy of metronidazole, coupled with the increased concern about imprudent use of vancomycin leading to increased resistance in enterococci, have made metronidazole the preferred agent here. Metronidazole has played an important role in anaerobic-related infections. Advantages to using metronidazole are the percentage of sensitive Gram-negative anaerobes, its availability as oral and intravenous dosage forms, its rapid bacterial killing, its good tissue penetration, its considerably lower chance of inducing C. difficile colitis, and expense. Metronidazole has notable effectiveness in treating anaerobic brain abscesses. Metronidazole is a cost-effective agent due to its low acquisition cost, its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, an acceptable adverse effect profile, and its undiminished antimicrobial activity. While its role as part of a therapeutic regimen for treating mixed aerobic/anaerobic infections has been reduced by newer, more expensive combination therapies, these new combinations have not been shown to have any therapeutic advantage over metronidazole. Although the use of metronidazole on a global scale has been curtailed by newer agents for various infections, metronidazole still has a role for these and other therapeutic uses. Many clinicians still consider metronidazole to be the 'gold standard' antibiotic against which all other antibiotics with anaerobic activity should be compared.

No abstract

Antibiograms are an important resource for health care providers. All clinicians involved in antibiotic selection and monitoring should become familiar with the NCCLS M39-A document “Analysis and Presentation of Cumulative Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Data: Approved Guideline.” Providers who interpret and apply antibiogram data in clinical practice should know about susceptibility testing methods, the susceptibility breakpoint determination process, and problems associated with antibiogram data analysis. The M39-A guidelines contain more than 40 recommendations, including the following: antibiogram data should be analyzed at least annually, an attempt should be made to remove duplicate isolates, and only organisms with 10 isolates or more should be presented. Accurate antibiograms facilitate improved empiric antibiotic selection and more precise monitoring of bacterial resistance in the hospital. This article reviews common antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods and relevant issues, highlights the major NCCLS M39-A recommendations, discusses the antibiogram preparation process and challenges in data interpretation, and provides a general overview of how antibiogram data may be applied to clinical practice.

Duplicate Staphylococcus aureus isolates were analyzed to determine the impact of multiple isolates from the same patient on annual antibiogram data. During a 6-year period (1996 to 2001), 3,227 patients with 4,844 S. aureus isolates were evaluated. A total of 39% of patients with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (n ‫؍‬ 860) and 23% of patients with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) (n ‫؍‬ 2,367) infections had duplicate isolates. Cumulative data show that 91% of the patients during this 6-year period with duplicate isolates (2 to 13 duplicates/year) did not switch between MSSA and MRSA but retained the original S. aureus strain whether it was MSSA or MRSA. Rates of MRSA were calculated for each year by using all isolates and then eliminating duplicates. The impact of duplicate MRSA and MSSA isolates was evaluated by using the ratio of isolates per patient such that ratios of >1.0 indicate >1 isolate per patient. The 6-year ratio for MRSA was 1.90 isolates/patient, and the ratio for MSSA was 1.35. A significant difference (P < 0.05) was noted in the MRSA rates in 4 of 6 years when duplicate isolates were removed. Common phenotypic antibiogram patterns were compared for all MRSA isolates during the 6-year period, and 64% were of a single antibiogram phenotype. Eighty-eight percent of patients with duplicate MRSA isolates had phenotypically identical multiple isolates. The rate of MRSA differs when duplicate isolates are removed from the antibiogram data.Staphylococcus aureus is a common cause of serious infections in the hospital and the community. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) was first detected in the1960s, and since that time it has spread rapidly worldwide, becoming a leading cause of nosocomial infections (5,7,15,16). Currently in the United States, Ͼ50% of nosocomial S. aureus infections in intensive care units (ICUs) are due to MRSA (6, 13). An additional concern with MRSA is that many strains have acquired resistance to several classes of antibiotics (3, 11).The periodic evaluation of rates for MRSA is crucial to both infection control monitoring and decisions regarding empirical therapy. A common method of documenting and monitoring MRSA rates is the antibiogram that reports periodically the rate of antimicrobial susceptibility for each bacterial organism and antibiotic. Generally, an antibiogram is a cumulative profile of antimicrobial susceptibility results for a given time period (10, 12). When properly prepared, antibiograms are important sources of information for healthcare providers. The lack of standardization in the preparation and data assimilation of hospital antibiograms has not been addressed until recently. To assist institutions, the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) organization has approved guidelines in the last year that are published in a document (M39A) entitled Analysis and Presentation of Cumulative Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Data: Approved Guideline (12). This document addresses the issue of repeat isolates and makes recomme...