We examined the in vivo metabolic effects of vanadyl sulfate (VS) in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Six NIDDM subjects treated with diet and/or sulfonylureas were examined at the end of three consecutive periods: placebo for 2 wk, VS (100 mg/d) for 3 wk, and placebo for 2 wk. Euglycemic hyperinsulinemic (30 mU/ m2 * min) clamps and oral glucose tolerance tests were performed at the end of each study period. Glycemic control at baseline was poor (fasting plasma glucose 210±19 mg/ dl; HbAlc 9.6±0.6%) and improved after treatment (181±14 mg/dl [P < 0.05],8.8±0.6%, [P < 0.002]); fasting and post-glucose tolerance test plasma insulin concentrations were unchanged. After VS, the glucose infusion rate during the clamp was increased (by -88%, from 1.80 to 3.38 mg/kg* min, P < 0.0001). This improvement was due to both enhanced insulin-mediated stimulation of glucose uptake (rate of glucose disposal [Rd.], +0.89 mg/kg min) and increased inhibition of HGP (-0.74 mg/kg r min) (P < 0.0001 for both). Increased insulin-stimulated glycogen synthesis (+0.74 mg/kg min, P < 0.0003) accounted for > 80% of the increased Rd after VS, and the improvement in insulin sensitivity was maintained after the second placebo period. The K. of skeletal muscle glycogen synthase was lowered by -30% after VS treatment (P < 0.05).These results indicate that 3 wk of treatment with VS improves hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity in insulin-resistant NIDDM humans. These effects were sustained for up to 2 wk after discontinuation of VS. (J. Clin. Invest. 1995. 95:2501-2509

We compared the effects of oral vanadyl sulfate (100 mg/day) in moderately obese NIDDM and nondiabetic subjects. Three-hour euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic (insulin infusion 30 mU / m / min) clamps were performed after 2 weeks of placebo and 3 weeks of vanadyl sulfate treatment in six nondiabetic control subjects (age 37 +/- 3 years; BMI 29.5 +/- 2.4 kg/m2 ) and seven NIDDM subjects (age 53 +/- 2 years; BMI 28.7 +/-1.8 kg/m2). Glucose turnover ([3-3 H]glucose), glycolysis from plasma glucose, glycogen synthesis, and whole-body carbohydrate and lipid oxidation were evaluated. Decreases in fasting plasma glucose (by approximately 1.7 mmol/l) and HbAlc (both P < 0.05) were observed in NIDDM subjects during treatment; plasma glucose was unchanged in control subjects. In the latter, the glucose infusion rate (GIR) required to maintain euglycemia (40.1 +/- 5.7 and 38.1 +/- 4.8 micromol / kg fat-free mass FFM / min) and glucose disposal (Rd) (41.7 +/- 5.7 and 38.9 +/-4.7 micromol / kg FFM / min were similar during placebo and vanadyl sulfate administration, respectively. Hepatic glucose output (HGO) was completely suppressed in both studies. In contrast, in NIDDM subjects, vanadyl sulfate increased GIR approximately 82% (17.3 +/- 4.7 to 30.9 +/- 2.7 micromol / kg FFM / min, P < 0.05); this improvement in insulin sensitivity was due to both augmented stimulation of Rd (26.0 +/-4.0 vs. 33.6 +/- 2.22 micromol / kg FFM / min, P < 0.05) and enhanced suppression of HGO (7.7 +/- 3.1 vs. 1.3 +/- 0.9 micromol / kg FFM / min, P < 0.05). Increased insulin-stimulated glycogen synthesis accounted for >80% of the increased Rd with vanadyl sulfate (P < 0.005), but plasma glucose flux via glycolysis was unchanged. In NIDDM subjects, vanadyl sulfate was also associated with greater suppression of plasma free fatty acids (FFAs) (P < 0.01) and lipid oxidation (P < 0.05) during clamps. The reduction in HGO and increase in Rd were both highly correlated with the decline in plasma FFA concentrations during the clamp period (P < 0.001). In conclusion, small oral doses of vanadyl sulfate do not alter insulin sensitivity in nondiabetic subjects, but it does improve both hepatic and skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity in NIDDM subjects in part by enhancing insulin's inhibitory effect on lipolysis. These data suggest that vanadyl sulfate may improve a defect in insulin signaling specific to NIDDM.

We examined the role of skeletal muscle in counterregulation of hypoglycemia (3.4 +/- 0.1 mmol/l) in 12 nondiabetic individuals (age 26 +/- 1 years, body mass index 24.2 +/- 0.7 kg/m2) during physiological hyperinsulinemia (280 +/- 25 pmol/l) compared with euglycemia (4.8 +/- 0.1 mmol/l). During hypoglycemia, hepatic glucose output (3-[3H]-glucose) was greater (7.72 +/- 2.72 mumol.kg-1.min-1, P < 0.01), glucose uptake was approximately 49% lower (21.20 +/- 3.55 mumol.kg-1.min-1, P < 0.005), and glucose clearance was reduced (P < 0.002) compared with euglycemia. Rates of flux of plasma-derived glucosyl units through glycolysis were similar in the two experiments, while glycogen synthetic rates were significantly reduced during hypoglycemia (P < 0.01) and accounted entirely for the reduction in glucose disposal. The insulin-induced activation of skeletal muscle glycogen synthase (reflected by Km decline by approximately 50% from 0.408 +/- 0.056 mmol/l and fractional velocity increase by approximately twofold from 21.8 +/- 2.7%) was completely abolished in hypoglycemia. In concert, glycogen phosphorylase activity increased during hypoglycemia by approximately 40% (P = 0.0001). Hypoglycemia resulted in seven- to eightfold increments in plasma epinephrine (P < 0.0001) and growth hormone (P < 0.001) and 40-60% increments in plasma glucagon (P < 0.005) and cortisol (P < 0.05). We conclude that, in this model of mild hypoglycemia of moderate duration, the majority of the glucose made available during the counterregulatory process (approximately 60-70%) is due to the limitation of glucose disposal, mostly via decreased glycogen synthetic activity in skeletal muscle.

The effects of physiological increments in epinephrine and insulin on glucose production (GP), skeletal muscle glycogen metabolism, and substrate oxidation were studied in eight insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and nine control subjects. Epinephrine was coinfused for the final 120 min of a 240-min euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic clamp. In both groups, insulin increased glucose uptake, glycogen synthesis, and whole body carbohydrate (CHO) oxidation and inhibited GP (by 70-80%) and lipid oxidation (by approximately 50%), whereas epinephrine antagonized the effect of insulin on glucose uptake and glycogen synthesis. In contrast, GP increased in IDDM subjects (P < 0.02) but remained suppressed by insulin in controls. CHO oxidation fell (1.37 +/- 0.25 vs. 2.08 +/- 0.32 mg.kg-1.min-1) and lipid oxidation increased to baseline in IDDM subjects, with increments in plasma free fatty acids (FFA) and glycerol. In contrast, in controls, plasma FFA and glycerol remained suppressed and lipid oxidation decreased further with epinephrine (P < 0.005). Epinephrine completely reversed insulin's activation of muscle glycogen synthase in both groups. Thus, during hyperinsulinemia, the hepatic response to epinephrine in IDDM subjects may be dependent on activation of lipid oxidation. Skeletal muscle glycogen metabolism is exquisitely sensitive to epinephrine despite the presence of hyperinsulinemia.

No abstract