Objective The present study aims to describe the main characteristics of female couples resorting to a fertility clinic, to understand whether these patients have clear previous plans concerning procreation and how they end up completing their family planning, and to briefly describe the main outcomes of the recepción de ovocitos de pareja (ROPA, in the Spanish acronym: in English, reception of partner's oocytes) method.
Methods This is a descriptive retrospective study of the pathway and outcomes of female couples in a fertility clinic during a 2-year period.
Results A total of 129 couples were treated. Only one third of the couples had no condition potentially affecting fertility or advanced age. Most couples were decided to undergo artificial insemination or in vitro fertilization and the majority kept their plans, as opposed to 38% of the couples who decided to the ROPA method (lesbian shared in vitro fertilization) who changed plans. Live birth rates per treatment (including frozen embryo transfers) for artificial insemination, 58% for in vitro fertilization, 80% for treatments with donated oocytes or embryos, and 79% for ROPA. Four in five couples achieved live births.
Conclusion The present study highlights the importance of a thorough medical workup in same-sex couples resorting to assisted reproduction. Despite the higher-than-expected rates of fertility disorders, the outcomes were good. Most couples end up in a single parented method. Furthermore, the results of the ROPA method are reassuring.
The ROPA (Reception of Oocytes from PArtner) method, also known as lesbian shared IVF (in vitro fertilization), is an assisted reproduction technique for female couples, in which one of the women provides the oocytes (genetic mother) and the other receives the embryo and gestates (gestational mother). As a double parented method, it is the only way lesbian women may biologically share motherhood. This is a narrative review of data concerning ROPA published in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. A total of 35 articles were included, 10 about motivations for undergoing ROPA, 13 about ethics or legislation, 4 about motherhood, and 8 studies reporting clinical outcomes. Despite being used for more than a decade, there is a paucity of data regarding this technique in scientific literature. Most women choose this technique to share biological motherhood, but medical issues may also justify its use. Many ethical and legal issues are still to be solved. Despite the small number of studies, data regarding the outcomes of this technique and the resulting motherhood are reassuring.
Objective
Lesbian couples must resort to adoption or donated semen to achieve
parenthood, the latter usually involving assisted reproductive technology.
The aim of this study is to assess homosexual women’s knowledge about
assisted reproductive techniques, the importance of perceived genetic and
gestational relationships for their future mother-child bond, as well as
their reproductive plans.
Methods
This is an observational study based on an anonymous survey disseminated
online in several countries on different continents, addressed to homosexual
women.
Results
From the 549 participants, most reported being well informed about
reproductive options including assisted reproductive technology. The
majority want to be a mother as part of a couple, mainly through assisted
reproduction or step adoption of their partner’s child. The importance of a
genetic or gestational relationships with their future child varies greatly
between women. Among the sampled women, pregnancy was believed to have a
slightly greater impact on the future mother-child connection compared to
genetics.
Conclusions
Homosexual women are well informed about the assisted reproductive technology
treatments. The majority considers it important to become a mother as a
couple, mainly through assisted reproduction or step adoption of their
partner’s child. The importance given to gestation or genetic mother-child
relationships varies greatly between women, and it seems they believe
pregnancy may have a slightly greater impact on the future mother-child
connection compared to genetics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.