-The aim of this paper was to evaluate the effects associated with intramammary infection (IMI) by a bacterium or a group of bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, Streptococcus uberis, coliforms, Staphylococci other than S. aureus, and Corynebacterium bovis) on the somatic cell count (SCC) in quarter milk of dairy cows. Papers selected for analysis had to provide SCC values associated with the natural infection in quarters by different bacteria. Sampling for measurement of SCC and determination of the infection had to be done on the same day. Only papers published in English or in French after 1971 were considered. Twenty-one papers fulfilled the selection criteria. The animals sampled, the measurement techniques for SCC and the bacteriological identification, as well as the definition of the infection, all differed widely among the selected studies. The meta-analysis method was used to estimate both the mean SCC (arithmetic and geometric) value and the average increase on SCC of each type of infection. The geometric mean SCC in bacteriologically negative quarters was 68 000 c/mL. In case of IMI, the retained SCC was 357 000, 857 000, 547 000, 1 024 000, 1 151 000, 138 000 and 105 000 c/mL in quarters infected by Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, Streptococcus uberis, coliforms, staphylococci other than S. aureus and Corynebacterium bovis, respectively. The variation factors that could influence these SCC values and the bacteriological results are discussed. dairy cow / mastitis / somatic cell count / meta-analysis Résumé -Méta-analyse des effets de l'infection sur la concentration en cellules somatiques du lait de quartier chez la vache laitière. Le présent article a pour objectif d'évaluer l'effet associé à l'infection intra-mammaire (IIM) par une bactérie ou par un groupe de bactéries (Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, Streptococcus uberis, coliformes, 335
The diagnosis of digital dermatitis (DD) in cows is crucial for researchers to evaluate the effectiveness of control measures. The objective of this study was to evaluate intra- and inter-observer agreement and accuracy of a simple method to score DD lesions that is based on the inspection of cleaned feet in the milking parlor with a swiveling mirror and a powerful headlamp. The hind feet of 242 Holstein cows from 4 farms were inspected concurrently by 5 observers (to assess inter-observer agreement) during 2 consecutive milkings (to assess intra-observer agreement). This inspection was followed by an inspection of the feet in a trimming chute, considered to be the gold standard test, to test for accuracy. The reliability of the method was assessed using both the 5 M-stages scoring system (M0 to M4, M standing for Mortellaro) and a simplified M-stages scoring system in which the M3 and M4 stages are merged. As most disagreements concerned the M3 and M4 stages, performance was improved with the simplified M-stages scoring system. With this simplified system, the method had good intra-observer agreement [percent of overall raw agreement (PA)=80%, weighted kappa (κ(w))=0.71, and good inter-observer agreement (PA=77%, κ(w)=0.66)]. The agreement with the gold standard test was moderate (PA=69%, κ(w)=0.58). Considering absence versus presence of a DD lesion on a foot, the method had good sensitivity (0.90) and specificity (0.80). The time spent for inspection varied from 30 to 60s per cow. Inspection of cleaned feet with a swiveling mirror and a powerful headlamp in the milking parlor is a reliable, cost- and time-friendly method, which may be useful for both farmers and researchers, especially when the DD status of many dairy cows has to be evaluated concomitantly. The reliability of this method might be improved by using more precise descriptive criteria for the discrimination of each M-stage.
-Risk of culling consequent to the main health disorders occurring in the current production systems is reviewed. Survival analysis including health disorders as time-dependent variables is considered to be the most appropriate method to assess their effects because they allow a better description of the exact follow-up of disease history. Farmers preferentially consider health events in the current lactation and/or those occurring in early stages of lactation for making culling decisions. The unfavourable direct effects on culling of dystocia and udder disorders (mastitis and teat injuries) are clearly demonstrated, whereas there are variations between studies on the association between metabolic and reproductive disorders and culling. These variations may be due to differences in study designs, populations involved and methods. Consequences, in terms of estimated effect of health disorders, of methodological choices (e.g. whether or not including in the models descriptors for milk yield and/or reproductive performance) are discussed. Metabolic and reproductive disorders may act indirectly through a subsequent decrease in milk yield and reproductive performance. The impact of health disorders on longevity is on average weak, compared to the impact of low milk yield potential and poor reproductive performance. Herd characteristics (availability of heifers, quota, farmer's attitude towards risk and uncertainty...) modify the risk for a cow to be culled for a given health disorder. Aims of further studies could be (1) to interpret the meaning and to analyse the reliability of culling reasons information, (2) to evaluate the relative effect on culling of health disorders and performance (milk yield and reproduction) in different parities, (3) to investigate the role of components of the herd effect on the risk of culling. dairy cow / culling / health disorders / risk factors / survival analysis Résumé -Risque de réforme associé à la survenue de troubles de santé chez la vache laitière : revue et discussion critique. La revue porte sur le risque de réforme consécutif à la survenue des principaux troubles de santé dans les systèmes de production actuels. Pour estimer ce risque, les modèles Ann. Zootech. 49 (2000) 293-311 293
Enteric and respiratory diseases are the most frequent health disorders of calves. They are associated with mortality or lower growth rate and induce treatment costs. Enteric and respiratory pathogens can be transmitted via contacts between calves, which depend on calf housing systems and management. This study aimed at describing the main calf housing systems across Europe and at assessing the consequences of such housing facilities in terms of risk for calf infectious diseases. This was done through the use of a questionnaire distributed to experts in epidemiology and cattle farming systems in each European country. A literature review was performed on the risk factors associated with calf infectious diseases transmission and targeted in the questionnaire. Answers from 14 countries were obtained. A wide range of housing systems were described. However, four main systems could be identified and ranked in ascending order of risk for neonatal diarrhoea and respiratory infectious diseases: individual pen until weaning, individual pen for 4 weeks, individual pen for 2 weeks, and collective pen from the separation of the calf with its dam. Although the housing systems are known to play a role in disease transmission, they are currently not fully described in literature concerning risk factors for calf infectious diseases. In a given farm, the risk assessment for calf infectious diseases should consider classical risk factors such as hygiene, feeding practices and air conditioning, on top of a precise description of the housing system.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.