The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, a large, longitudinal study of brain development and child health, is uniquely positioned to explore relationships among stress, neurodevelopment, and psychiatric symptomatology, including substance use and addiction. There is much we do not know about how adverse experiences affect the developing brain and cognitive, social, emotional, and academic outcomes. The data collected by the ABCD Study will allow the examination of the relationships among these variables in adolescence, including the effects of stressors (e.g., abuse, neglect, household challenges, parental substance use) on psychological adjustment and other stress responses. A comprehensive protocol that includes physical and mental health, substance use, culture and environment, neurocognitive assessments, biospecimen analyses, and structural and functional neuroimaging will provide opportunities for learning about the impacts of stressors on health and other outcomes in the context of adolescent development. This knowledge could lead to the development of interventions that reduce or even reverse the impacts of stressors.

Every year, about 700,000 youth arrests occur in the United States, creating significant neurodevelopmental strain; this is especially concerning as most of these youth have early life adversity exposures that may alter brain development. Males, Black, and Latinx youth, and individuals from low socioeconomic status households have disproportionate contact with the juvenile justice system (JJS). Youth confined in the JJS are frequently exposed to threat and abuse, in addition to separation from family and other social supports. Youths’ educational and exploratory behaviors and activities are substantially restricted, and youth are confined to sterile environments that often lack sufficient enrichment resources. In addition to their demonstrated ineffectiveness in preventing future delinquent behaviors, high recidivism rates, and costs, juvenile conditions of confinement likely exacerbate youths’ adversity burden and neurodevelopmentally harm youth during the temporally sensitive window of adolescence. Developmentally appropriate methods that capitalize on adolescents’ unique rehabilitative potential should be instated through interventions that minimize confinement. Such changes would require joint advocacy from the pediatric and behavioral health care communities. “The distinct nature of children, their initial dependent, and developmental state, their unique human potential as well as their vulnerability, all demand the need for more, rather than less, legal and other protection from all forms of violence (United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child, 2007).”

ImportanceInterventions directly targeting social factors, such as education, may have the potential to greatly improve health.ObjectiveTo examine the association of attending a high-performing public charter high school with rates of substance use disorder and physical and mental health.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study used the random school admissions lottery system of high-performing public charter high schools in low-income neighborhoods of Los Angeles, California, to examine the health outcomes of students who applied to at least 1 of 5 of these high schools. Participants attended 147 different high schools and were randomly selected from those who won the admissions lottery (intervention group) and those who were placed on a waiting list (control group). Participants were surveyed at the end of grade 8 through transition into grade 9 and then from grade 10 through 3 years after high school completion (at age 21 years). Surveys were conducted from March 2013 through November 2021.InterventionAttendance at a high-performing public charter high school.Main Outcomes and MeasuresSelf-reported alcohol use disorder and cannabis misuse, delinquent behaviors, physical and mental health, and body mass index.ResultsOf the 1270 participants at baseline (mean [SD] age, 14.2 [0.47] years; 668 female individuals [52.6%]). The control group included 576 individuals (45.4%), and 694 individuals (54.6%) were in the intervention group. Both groups were similar in almost all characteristics at baseline, and the median (IQR) follow-up was 6.4 (6.0-6.7) years. Participants attending a high-performing public charter high school had a 53.33% lower rate of hazardous or dependent alcohol use disorder compared with those in the control group (5.43% vs 11.64%; difference, −6.21% [95% CI, −11.87% to −0.55%]; P = .03). Among male participants, the intervention group had a 42.05% lower rate of self-reported fair or poor physical health (13.33% vs 23.01%; difference, −9.67% [95% CI, −18.30% to −1.05%]; P = .03) and a 32.94% lower rate of obesity or overweight (29.28% vs 43.67%; difference, −14.38% [95% CI, −25.74% to −3.02%]; P = .02) compared with the control group. Among female participants, attending a high-performing public charter high school was associated with worse physical health outcomes (30.29% vs 13.47% reporting fair or poor health; difference, 16.82% [95% CI, 0.36% to 33.28%]; P = .045) and higher rates of overweight or obesity (52.20% vs 32.91%; difference, 19.30% [95% CI, 3.37% to 35.22%]; P = .02) at age 21 years. Few differences in mental health outcomes were observed. Adjusting for educational outcomes did not significantly change these findings.Conclusions and RelevanceResults of this study suggest that attending a high-performing public charter high school was associated with lower rates of substance use disorder independent of academic achievement. Physical health and obesity outcomes were also better but only for young men; the intervention group had worse physical health outcomes among young women for unclear reasons. Schools are a potent social determinant of health and an important target for future health interventions.

Background Adversity occurring during development is associated with detrimental health and quality of life outcomes, not just following exposure but throughout the lifespan. Despite increased research, there exists both overlapping and distinct definitions of early life adversity exposure captured by over 30 different empirically validated tools. A data-driven approach to defining and cataloging exposure is needed to better understand associated outcomes and advance the field. Methods We utilized baseline data on 11,566 youth enrolled in the ABCD Study to catalog youth and caregiver-reported early life adversity exposure captured across 14 different measures. We employed an exploratory factor analysis to identify the factor domains of early life adversity exposure and conducted a series of regression analyses to examine its association with problematic behavioral outcomes. Results The exploratory factor analysis yielded a 6-factor solution corresponding to the following distinct domains: 1) physical and sexual violence; 2) parental psychopathology; 3) neighborhood threat; 4) prenatal substance exposure; 5) scarcity; and 6) household dysfunction. The prevalence of exposure among 9-and 10-year-old youth was largely driven by the incidence of parental psychopathology. Sociodemographic characteristics significantly differed between youth with adversity exposure and controls, depicting a higher incidence of exposure among racial and ethnic minoritized youth, and among those identifying with low socioeconomic status. Adversity exposure was significantly associated with greater problematic behaviors and largely driven by the incidence of parental psychopathology, household dysfunction and neighborhood threat. Certain types of early life adversity exposure were more significantly associated with internalizing as opposed to externalizing problematic behaviors. Conclusions We recommend a data-driven approach to define and catalog early life adversity exposure and suggest the incorporation of more versus less data to capture the nuances of exposure, e.g., type, age of onset, frequency, duration. The broad categorizations of early life adversity exposure into two domains, such as abuse and neglect, or threat and deprivation, fail to account for the routine co-occurrence of exposures and the duality of some forms of adversity. The development and use of a data-driven definition of early life adversity exposure is a crucial step to lessening barriers to evidence-based treatments and interventions for youth.