This study empirically examines the impact of climate change on cereal production in selected lower-middle-income countries with a balanced panel dataset spanning the period 1971-2016. The study uses average annual temperature, average annual rainfall, and CO 2 emissions to measure climate change. Besides this, cultivated land under cereal production, and rural population are also used as the control variables. Second generation unit root tests, i.e., CIPS, and CADF, are used to test the stationarity of the variables.Feasible Generalized Least Square (FGLS) model is used to overcome the issues of cross-sectional dependence, serial correlation, and group-wise heteroscedasticity. The ndings show that a rise in the temperature reduces the cereal production in lower-middleincome countries. While other climate variables, i.e., rainfall and CO 2, affect cereal production positively. The sensitivity of long run elasticity has been checked with the help of Driscoll-Kraay standard regression. The adverse effects of temperature on cereal production are likely to pose severe implications for food security. In conclusion, the paper recommends that governments and cereal producers should carry out adaptation activities and programmes to cope with the negative effects of temperature on cereal production.

No abstract

G20 countries are responsible for more than 80% of global energy consumption and the largest CO 2 emissions in the world. Literature related to the energy consumption-environmental quality-subjective wellbeing nexus is limited and lacks consensus. This paper analyses the impact of energy consumption and environmental quality on subjective wellbeing in G20 countries from 2006 to 2019 using a panel-corrected standard error (PCSE) model. Cantril life ladder data is used as a proxy of subjective wellbeing. For robustness, the Newey-West standard error model is used. The findings reveal that renewable energy consumption and environmental quality, i.e. lesser carbon emissions, enhance subjective wellbeing in G20 countries. In contrast, non-renewable energy consumption degrades subjective wellbeing. Moreover, the study also finds bidirectional causality between renewable energy consumption, non-renewable energy consumption, and economic growth. The policymakers of these countries should encourage renewable energy production and its consumption to reduce carbon emissions for conserving the environment and enhancing their people’s subjective wellbeing.

No abstract

The study has tried to investigate the status of the financial inclusion of tribal people in two tribal concentrated districts, namely Bolangir and Mayurbhanj, in the state of Odisha. Field investigations were undertaken to find out the status of financial inclusion in six villages of these two districts where the proportion of the tribal population was larger than that of the total population. Primary data were collected from 300 households by using a semi-open survey schedule. It was found that about 71.7 per cent of households had no savings bank accounts; 70.7 per cent were not involved in self-help group activities and 97.7 per cent did not have post office savings accounts. Additionally, a logit regression model was used to identify the various determinants of financial inclusion of tribal households. The results revealed that years of education attained by the household head, size of private-owned land, total annual income of the household and participation in the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) were significant determinants for financial inclusion among tribal people.