Background and objectivesRecent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have indicated potential therapeutic benefits with high-dose dexamethasone (HDD) or tocilizumab (TCZ) plus standard care in moderate to severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). No study has compared these two against each other. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of HDD against TCZ in moderate to severe COVID-ARDS. MethodsPatients admitted with moderate to severe COVID-19 ARDS with clinical worsening within 48 hours of standard care were randomly assigned to receive either HDD or TCZ plus standard care. The primary outcome was ventilator-free days (VFDs) at 28 days. The main secondary outcomes were 28-day all-cause mortality and the incidence of adverse events. Our initial plan was to perform an interim analysis of the first 42 patients. ResultsVFDs were significantly lower in the HDD arm (median difference: 28 days; 95% confidence interval (CI): 19.35-36.65; Cohen's d = 1.14; p < 0.001). We stopped the trial at the first interim analysis due to high 28-day mortality in the HDD arm (relative risk (RR) of death: 6.5; p = 0.007; NNT (harm) = 1.91). The incidence of secondary infections was also significantly high in the HDD arm (RR: 5.5; p = 0.015; NNT (harm) = 2.33). ConclusionsIn our study population, HDD was associated with a very high rate of mortality and adverse events. We would not recommend HDD to mitigate the cytokine storm in moderate to severe COVID-19 ARDS. TCZ appears to be a much better and safer alternative.

No abstract

No abstract

BackgroundSurvivors of COVID-19 pneumonia may have residual lung injury and poor physical and mental health even after discharge. We hypothesized that COVID-19 severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients needing mechanical ventilation may be at a greater risk of deterioration in pulmonary function, mental health, and quality of life (QOL). This study analyses the differences in pulmonary function, mental health, and QOL after recovery, in patients having received non-invasive oxygen therapy versus invasive mechanical ventilation during ICU stay. MethodsPatients aged >18 years, who had completed 3 months post ICU discharge, with moderate to severe COVID-19 ARDS, were consecutively enrolled from May 1 to July 31, 2021. Patients were allocated into Group Ahaving required high flow nasal cannula (HFNC)/non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and Group B -having received invasive mechanical ventilation. Pulmonary function tests, 6-minute walk test (6-MWT), and health-related quality of life were compared. ResultsOf the 145 eligible patients, 31 were lost to follow-up and 21 died. Seventy-four patients were allocated into Groups A (57 patients) and B (17 patients). In Group A, abnormal forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV 1 ), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory flow in mid-half of FVC (FEF 25-75 ), and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) values were obtained in 27 (47.37%), 43 (75.44%), 11 (19.3%), and 25 (43.86%) patients, and in Group B, in 13 (76.47%), 17 (100%), 1 (5.88%), and 8 (47%) patients, respectively. No patient had abnormal FEV 1 /FVC. All Group B patients had a restrictive pattern in spirometry as compared to 77% in Group A. Group B had a lower arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO 2 ) (p=0.0019), % predicted FVC (p<0.0001), % predicted FEV 1 (p=0.001), and 6-MWT distance (p<0.001). The physical component score in the short-form survey 12 questionnaire was higher in group A, p<0.001, whereas the mental component score was comparable. ConclusionsPatients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) have a greater risk of impaired pulmonary function and reduced QOL post-ICU discharge. This warrants a greater need for following these patients for better rehabilitation.

Background The intracranial pressure (ICP) is measured through various noninvasive methods to overcome complications of invasive ICP monitoring. In this study, transcranial Doppler was used to measure pulsatility index (PI) and resistive index (RI) that were correlated with opening intraventricular ICP. The opening intraventricular ICP was measured with the placement of intraventricular catheter in lateral ventricle without loss of cerebrospinal fluid. Methods The prospective, observational study was conducted on 40 patients with clinical and radiological features of raised ICP who underwent either endoscopic third ventriculostomy or ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery. The PI and RI were measured simultaneously with opening ICP measurements under general anesthesia. Both PI and RI were correlated with ICP by using Pearson correlation coefficient. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to get the optimal values of PI ad RI for corresponding ICP values. Results The mean PI was 1.01 ± 0.41 and mean RI was 0.59 ± 0.32. The mean opening ICP value was 21.81 ± 8.68 mm Hg. The correlation between PI and RI with ICP was a statistically significant with correlation coefficient of 0.697 and 0.503, respectively. The ROC curve shown statistically significant association between PI and ICP from 15 to 40 mm Hg, whereas the association between RI and ICP was from 15 to 25 mm Hg, with various sensitivity and specificity. Conclusion The opening intraventricular ICP correlated better with PI than RI in patients with features of raised ICP.

Background: The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in neurosurgery remains controversial because of potential risk of hematoma formation secondary to platelet dysfunction. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of diclofenac compared with paracetamol for the management of postcraniotomy pain. Methods: In all, 110 adult patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial tumors were randomized to receive either intravenous paracetamol (15 mg/kg) or intravenous diclofenac sodium (1.5 mg/kg) 30 minutes before the end of surgery and postoperatively at 12-hour intervals up to 48 hours. The analgesic efficacy of diclofenac and paracetamol was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score at 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery. We also examined the need for rescue analgesia, coagulation profiles using a Sonoclot analyzer, and incidence of intracranial hematoma formation. Results: At 24 hours postsurgery, NRS scores were lower in group D than in group P; median (interquartile range) and mean rank NRS score in group D was 3.00 (1.0), 43.71, respectively, compared with 3.00 (1.0), 59.29 in group P (P=0.004). Patients in group P received more rescue analgesia than those in group D. Coagulation profiles were similar between groups at 24 hours. Activated clotting time was longer in group D (128.76±12.61 s) than in group P (123.84±09.77 s; P=0.03) at 48 hours, although remained within normal limits in both groups; clot rate and platelet function were similar at 48 hours. There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative tumor bed hematoma. Conclusion: Compared with paracetamol, diclofenac sodium provided more effective postoperative analgesia at 24 hours with no evidence of adverse effects on coagulation profiles in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial tumors.

Background: Fluid imbalance is common after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and negatively impacts clinical outcomes. We compared intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) using left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT-VTI) measured by transesophageal echocardiography with central venous pressure (CVP)-guided fluid therapy during aneurysm clipping in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients.Methods: Fifty adults scheduled for urgent craniotomy for aneurysm clipping were randomly allocated to 2 groups: group G (n = 25) received GDFT guided by LVOT-VTI and group C (n = 25) received CVP-guided fluid management. The primary outcome was intraoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP). Secondary outcomes included volume of fluid administered and several other intraoperative and postoperative variables, including neurological outcome at hospital discharge and at 30 and 90 days.Results: There was no difference in MAP between the 2 groups despite patients in group G receiving lower volumes of fluid compared with patients in group C (2503.6 ± 534.3 vs. 3732.8 ± 676.5 mL, respectively; P < 0.0001). Heart rate and diastolic blood pressure were also comparable between groups, whereas systolic blood pressure was higher in group G than in group C at several intraoperative time points. Other intraoperative variables, including blood loss, urine output, and lac-tate levels were not different between the 2 groups. Postoperative variables, including creatinine, duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, and incidence of acute kidney injury, pneumonitis, and vasospasm were also comparable between groups. There was no difference in neurological outcome at hospital discharge (modified Rankin scale) and at 30 and 90 days (Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale) between the 2 groups. Conclusion:Compared with CVP-guided fluid therapy, transesophageal echocardiography-guided GDFT maintains MAP with lower volumes of intravenous fluid in patients undergoing clipping of intracranial aneurysms with no adverse impact on postoperative complications.

No abstract