Objective. Patients with unilateral hip or knee replacements for end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) are at high risk for future progression of OA in other joints of the lower extremities, often requiring additional joint replacements. Although the risks of future surgery in the contralateral cognate joints (i.e., contralateral hip replacement after an initial hip replacement) have been evaluated, the evolution of end-stage hip OA to OA involving the knee joints, and vice versa (i.e., noncognate progression) has not been investigated. Because characterization of OA progression in noncognate joints may shed light on the pathogenesis of multijoint OA, we investigated the pattern of evolution of end-stage lower extremity OA in a large, clinical cohort.Methods. Total joint replacement (TJR) was selected as a marker of end-stage OA, and a database comprising all lower extremity TJRs performed at a large referral center between 1981 and 2001 was accessed. Of the 5,894 patients identified, 486 patients with idiopathic OA who underwent hip replacement and 414 who underwent initial knee replacement were analyzed to determine the relative likelihood of subsequent TJRs. Patients with the systemic inflammatory arthropathy, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), were evaluated as a control population because RA progression is not considered to be a primarily mechanically mediated process.Results. The contralateral cognate joint was the most common second joint to undergo replacement in both the OA and the RA groups. However, in OA patients for whom the second TJR was in a noncognate joint, that joint was >2-fold more likely to be on the contralateral limb than on the ipsilateral limb (hip to knee P < 0.001; knee to hip P ؍ 0.013). In contrast, among the RA cohort, the evolution was random and no laterality for noncognate TJR was observed at either the hip or the knee (P ؍ 0.782).Conclusion. This characterization of end-stage lower extremity OA demonstrates that the disease evolves nonrandomly; after 1 joint is replaced, the contralateral limb is significantly more likely to show progression of OA than is the ipsilateral limb. Thus, OA in 1 weight-bearing joint appears to influence the evolution of OA in other joints. The absence of such laterality in RA suggests that OA progression may be mediated by extrinsic factors such as altered joint loading.
Objective. Subjects with unilateral end-stage hip osteoarthritis (OA) who undergo total hip replacement (THR) preferentially require subsequent replacement of the contralateral knee compared with the ipsilateral knee. We investigated whether this nonrandom, preferential evolution of lower extremity OA from the hip to the contralateral knee joint may be related to asymmetries in dynamic joint loading at the knees, particularly the peak external knee adduction moment, which has been associated with the progression of knee OA.Methods. Gait analysis was performed on 50 subjects who were preoperative for unilateral THR. Twenty-two of these subjects were reevaluated postoperatively 10-23 months after undergoing successful THR. At each analysis, dynamic joint loads in the contralateral knee were compared with those in the ipsilateral knee.Results. Prior to THR, the peak external knee adduction moment and peak medial compartment load were significantly higher in the contralateral knee. This asymmetry persisted after THR.Conclusion. Subjects with unilateral end-stage hip OA preferentially require subsequent replacement of the contralateral knee, as compared with the ipsilateral knee. Among patients with unilateral end-stage hip OA, the contralateral knee is subjected to higher dynamic joint loads than is the ipsilateral knee, and this asymmetric loading persists long after subjects have undergone successful THR. Biomechanical factors appear to be involved in the multiarticular evolution of OA of the lower extremities.
Objective. Vibratory perception threshold (VPT) assesses a distinct yet related sensory pathway that has been associated with neuropathic arthropathy but has not been assessed in knee osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate VPT in subjects with knee OA to determine whether the lower extremity afferent deficits observed in knee OA involve more than just proprioception. Methods. Twenty-seven individuals with symptomatic and radiographic knee OA were compared with 14 age-matched normal subjects. VPT was assessed using a biothesiometer. Five sites of the lower extremity were evaluated. VPT of OA subjects was compared with VPT of normal subjects. Results. VPT of the OA subjects was significantly reduced at all 5 testing sites compared with normal subjects (P < 0.05 at all sites). VPT scores (mean ؎ SEM volts) for OA subjects and normal subjects were as follows: first metatarsophalangeal joint (15.0 ؎ 1.9 versus 6.4 ؎ 0.9), medial malleolus (22.0 ؎ 2.2 versus 12.3 ؎ 1.4), lateral malleolus (22.3 ؎ 2.0 versus 10.4 ؎ 0.8), medial femoral condyle (25.8 ؎ 1.8 versus 15.9 ؎ 1.9), and lateral femoral condyle (27 ؎ 1.9 versus 18.9 ؎ 2.4). Conclusion. This was the first study to evaluate VPT in OA and demonstrate that VPT is reduced at the lower extremity of subjects with knee OA. The noted deficits in VPT may have significant implications in the neuromechanical pathophysiology of OA. VPT is a simple and reliable technique to measure sensory deficits in subjects with OA of the knee.
Objective Elevated dynamic joint loads have been associated with the severity and progression of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. This study compared the effects of a specialized shoe (the mobility shoe) designed to lower dynamic loads at the knee with self-chosen conventional walking shoes and with a commercially available walking shoe as a control. Methods Subjects with knee OA were evaluated in 2 groups. Group A (n = 28) underwent gait analyses with both their self-chosen walking shoes and the mobility shoes. Group B (n = 20) underwent gait analyses with a control shoe and the mobility shoe. Frontal plane knee loads were compared between the different footwear conditions. Results Group A demonstrated an 8% reduction in the peak external knee adduction moment with the mobility shoe compared with self-chosen walking shoes (mean ± SD 49 ± 0.80 versus 2.71 ± 0.84 %BW × H; P < 0.05). Group B demonstrated a 12% reduction in the peak external knee adduction moment with the mobility shoe compared with the control shoe (mean ± SD 2.66 ± 0.69 versus 3.07 ± 0.75 %BW × H; P < 0.05). Conclusion Specialized footwear can effectively reduce joint loads in subjects with knee OA, compared with self-chosen shoes and control walking shoes. Footwear may represent a therapeutic target for the treatment of knee OA. The types of shoes worn by subjects with knee OA should be evaluated more closely in terms of their effects on the disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.