Load reducing mechanisms, such as a decreased midstance knee flexion angle, identified by others in subjects with endstage knee OA or reduced external flexion or extension moments were not present in this group of subjects with knee OA who were being managed by conservative treatment. The finding of a significantly greater than normal external knee adduction moment in the knee OA group lends support to the hypothesis that an increased knee adduction moment during gait is associated with knee OA.
This study tested whether the peak external knee adduction moments during walking in subjects with knee osteoarthritis (OA) were correlated with the mechanical axis of the leg, radiographic measures of OA severity, toe out angle or clinical assessments of pain, stiffness or function. Gait analysis was performed on 62 subjects with knee OA and 49 asymptomatic control subjects (normal subjects). The subjects with OA walked with a greater than normal peak adduction moment during early stance 0, = 0.027). In the OA group, the mechanical axis was the best single predictor of the peak adduction moment during both early and late stance (R = 0.74, p < 0,001). The radiographic measures of OA severity in the medial compartment were also predictive of both peak adduction moments (R = 0.43 to 0.48, p < 0.001) along with the sum of the WOMAC subscales (R = -0.33 to -0.31, p < 0.017). The toe out angle was predictive of the peak adduction moment only during late stance ( R = -0.45, p < 0.001). Once mechanical axis was accounted for, other factors only increased the ability to predict the peak knee adduction moments by 10-18%~ While the mechanical axis was indicative of the peak adduction moments, it only accounted for about 50% of its variation, emphasizing the need for a dynamic evaluation of the knee joint loading environment. Understanding which clinical measures of OA are most closely associated with the dynamic knee joint loads may ultimately result in a better understanding of the disease process and the development of therapeutic interventions.
Objective. The adduction moment at the knee during gait is the primary determinant of medial-tolateral load distribution. If the adduction moment contributes to progression of osteoarthritis (OA), then patients with advanced medial tibiofemoral OA should have higher adduction moments. The present study was undertaken to investigate the hypothesis that the adduction moment normalized for weight and height is associated with medial tibiofemoral OA disease severity after controlling for age, sex, and pain level, and to examine the correlation of serum hyaluronan (HA) level with disease severity and with the adduction moment in a subset of patients.Methods. Fifty-four patients with medial tibiofemoral OA underwent gait analysis and radiographic evaluation. Disease severity was assessed using the Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade and medial joint space width. In a subset of 23 patients with available sera, HA was quantified by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Pearson correlations, a random effects model, and multivariate regression models were used.Results. The adduction moment correlated with the K-L grade in the left and right knees (r = 0.68 and r = 0.60, respectively), and with joint space width in the left and right knees (r = -0.45 and r = -0.47,
Objective. To determine whether reducing walking speed is a strategy used by patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) of varying disease severity to reduce the maximum knee adduction moment.Methods. Self-selected walking speeds and maximum knee adduction moments of 44 patients with medial tibiofemoral OA of varying disease severity, as assessed by using the Kellgren/Lawrence grade, were compared with those of 44 asymptomatic control subjects matched for sex, age, height, and weight.Results. Differences in self-selected normal walking speed explained only 8.9% of the variation in maximum knee adduction moment for the group of patients with knee OA. The severity of the disease influenced the adduction moment-walking speed relationship; the individual slopes of this relationship were significantly greater in patients with less severe OA than in asymptomatic matched control subjects. Self-selected walking speed did not differ between patients with knee OA, regardless of the severity, and asymptomatic control subjects. However, knees with more-severe OA had significantly greater adduction moments (mean ؎ SD 3.80 ؎ 0.89% body weight ؋ height) and were in more varus alignment (6.0 ؎ 4.5°) than knees with less-severe OA (2.94 ؎ 0.70% body weight ؋ height; and 0.0 ؎ 2.9°, respectively).Conclusion. Patients with less-severe OA adapt a walking style that differs from that of patients with more-severe OA and controls. This walking style is associated with the potential to reduce the adduction moment when walking at slower speeds and could be linked to decreased disease severity.Mechanical loads placed upon the joint during walking have been related to the progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA) (1,2). Theoretical estimations show that loads transferred through the medial compartment of the knee are ϳ2.5 times greater than loads transferred through the lateral compartment of the knee (3), and the majority of symptomatic OA knees are radiographically diagnosed with degenerative changes in the medial compartment of the joint (4). Moreover, increased mechanical load on the medial compartment of the knee has been associated with knee varus alignment, typically measured statically as mechanical axis alignment (5) or dynamically as external knee adduction moment (3), and a positive correlation between mechanical axis alignment and maximum external knee adduction moment has been reported (6,7).The relevance of the maximum knee adduction moment for the course of the disease has been emphasized by results of recent studies (1,2) that showed that high maximum adduction moments at the knee at a controlled walking speed are related to OA disease severity and to a higher rate of progression of knee OA. Nevertheless, it is still unclear whether the maximum knee adduction moment in patients with OA is higher than that of healthy control subjects when walking at
Objective. To test the hypothesis that a greater peak internal hip abduction moment is associated with a reduced likelihood of ipsilateral medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) progression.Methods. Fifty-seven persons with knee OA (by definite osteophyte presence and symptoms) were evaluated. Baseline assessments included kinematic and kinetic gait parameters, obtained with an optoelectronic camera system and force platform, with inverse dynamics used to calculate 3-dimensional moments at the joints; pain, using a separate visual analog scale for each knee; and alignment, using full-limb radiographs. Radiographs of the knee in a semiflexed position, with fluoroscopic confirmation of tibial rim alignment, were obtained at baseline and 18 months later. Disease progression was defined as worsening of the grade of medial joint space narrowing. Logistic regression obtained with generalized estimating equations was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for progression per unit of hip abduction moment, after excluding knees with the worst joint space grade at baseline (which could not progress).Results. The 57 participants (63% women) with mild to moderate OA had a mean age of 67 years and a mean body mass index of 29. A greater internal hip abduction moment during gait was associated with a reduced likelihood of medial tibiofemoral OA progression, with OR/unit hip abduction moment of 0.52 and a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of 0.32-0.85. This protective effect persisted after adjustment for age, sex, walking speed, knee pain severity, physical activity, varus malalignment severity, hip OA presence, and hip OA symptom presence, with an adjusted OR of 0.43 a 95% CI of 0.22-0.81. Conclusion.A greater hip abduction moment during gait at baseline protected against ipsilateral medial OA progression from baseline to 18 months. The likelihood of medial tibiofemoral OA progression was reduced 50% per 1 unit of hip abduction moment.
Although treatments for osteoarthritis of the knee are often directed at relieving pain, pain may cause patients to alter how they perform activities to decrease the loads on the joints. The knee-adduction moment is a major determinant of the load distribution between the medial and lateral plateaus. Therefore, the interrelationship between pain and the external knee-adduction moment during walking may be especially important for understanding mechanical factors related to the progression of medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. Fifty-three subjects with symptomatic radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis of the knee were studied. These subjects were a subset of those enrolled in a double-blind study in which gait analysis and radiographic and clinical evaluations were performed after a 2-week washout of anti-inflammatory and analgesic treatment. The subjects then took a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, acetaminophen, or placebo for 2 weeks, and the gait and clinical evaluations were repeated. The change in the peak external adduction moment between the two evaluations was inversely correlated with the change in pain (R = 0.48, p < 0.001) and was significantly different between those whose pain increased (n = 7), decreased (n = 18), or remained unchanged (n = 28) (p = 0.009). Those with increased pain had a significant decrease in the peak external adduction (p = 0.005) and flexion moments (p = 0.023). In contrast, the subjects with decreased pain tended to have an increase in the peak external adduction moment (p = 0.095) and had a significant increase in the peak external extension moment (p = 0.017). The subjects whose pain was unchanged had no significant change in the peak external adduction (p = 0.757), flexion (p = 0.234), or extension (p = 0.465) moments. Thus, decreases in pain among patients with medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis were related to increased loading of the degenerative portion of the joints. Additional long-term prospective studies are needed to determine whether increased loading during walking actually results in accelerated progression of the disease.
This study related mechanisms of gait compensations to the level of pain and to limitations in passive motion in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. Joint motion, moments, and intersegmental forces were calculated for 19 patients with unilateral osteoarthritis of the hip (12 men and seven women) and for a group of normal subjects (12 men and seven women) with a similar age distribution. The patients who had osteoarthritis walked with a decreased dynamic range of motion (17 +/- 4 degrees) of the hip and with a hesitation or reversal in the direction of the sagittal plane motion as they extended the hip. The patients with a hesitation or reversal in motion had a greater loss in the range of motion of the hip during gait (p < 0.004) and a greater passive flexion contracture (p < 0.022) than those with a smooth pattern of hip motion. This alteration in the pattern of motion was interpreted as a mechanism to increase effective extension of the hip during stance through increased anterior pelvic tilt and lumbar lordosis. The patients who had osteoarthritis of the hip walked with significantly decreased external extension, adduction, and internal and external rotation moments (p < 0.008). The decreased extension moment was significantly correlated with an increased level of pain (R = 0.78; p < 0.001). This finding suggests that decreasing muscle forces (hip flexors) may be one mechanism used to adapt to pain.
Objective. To determine whether the presence of varus thrust at baseline increases the risk of progression of medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (OA), whether knees with thrust have a greater adduction moment, whether thrust has any additional impact on top of static varus, and whether thrust is associated with poor physical function outcome.Methods. Two hundred thirty-seven patients with knee OA (definite osteophytes and symptoms) underwent baseline gait observation to assess varus thrust and full-limb radiography to assess alignment. Sixtyfour of these 237 patients also underwent quantitative gait analysis to determine the maximum knee adduction moment. Two hundred thirty patients (97%) returned for followup at 18 months. At baseline and 18 months, the 230 participants had semiflexed, fluoroscopically confirmed knee radiographs (with progression defined as worsening of medial joint space grade); self-reported and performance-based measures of function were also assessed. Logistic regression with generalized estimating equations was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for medial OA progression, after excluding knees that were not at risk for progression.Results. Varus thrust was present in 67 of 401 knees. Thrust increased 4-fold (age-, sex-, body mass index-, and pain-adjusted OR 3.96, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.11-7.43) the odds of medial progression, with some reduction after further adjustment for varus alignment severity. In varus-aligned knees, thrust increased the odds of OA progression 3-fold (adjusted OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.60-6.31). In the gait substudy, the adduction moment was greater in knees with a thrust compared with knees without a thrust. Having a thrust in both knees versus neither knee was associated with a 2-fold increase in the OR for poor physical function outcome (P not significant).Conclusion. Varus thrust is a potent risk factor, identifiable by simple gait observation, for disease progression in the medial compartment, the most common site of OA involvement at the knee. Varus thrust may also predict poor physical function outcome. Varus thrust increased the odds of progression among varusaligned knees considered separately, suggesting that knees with a thrust are a subset of varus-aligned knees at particularly high risk for progression of OA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.