When pharmacological treatment is needed to reach control of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), insulin is still first-line agent but metformin has been progressively pointed as an effective alternative. Our aim is to confirm whether metformin is an effective and safe option to insulin, by comparing maternal and foetal outcomes between women with GDM treated with these drugs. Retrospective study including 399 women with GDM, 135 needing pharmacological treatment. Comparison of demographic features, risk factors for GDM, maternal and foetal outcomes between women treated with insulin (G1, 41/135) and those treated with metformin (G2, 94/135). X 2 /Fisher tests were performed. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Both groups showed similar features and risk factors for GDM, except for chronic hypertension, more prevalent in G1. Therapy with insulin showed poorer metabolic control with higher rate of pregnant with HbA1c ≥ 6% (42 mmol/mol) (25.6 vs 4.5%, p = 0.001) and more polihydramnios (14.6% vs 3.2%, p = 0.023). A higher rate of caesarean was observed in G1, however, with no statistical difference (42.5% vs 26.9%, p = 0.076). There were more newborns weighing < 2500 g in women treated with metformin. No other outcome showed difference with statistical significance, namely maternal weight gain, macrosomia or neonatal comorbidities. Metformin allowed a good metabolic control with maternal and foetal outcomes similar to insulin. Metformin has proven effective as a pharmacological option to insulin. Prospective and randomized studies are needed as well as evaluation of long term benefits of metformin.
Background Beatriz Ângelo Hospital (HBA) is 424-bed district hospital (210-bed Medical Specialties, 90-bed Surgical Specialties, and 22-bed Intensive/Intermediate care unit, among others). All prescriptions are validated by a pharmacist at the Department of Pharmacy (DP), and it is always possible to access the electronic medical record of each patient to consult clinical data and record any suggestions or interventions. For the purposes of this study, pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) are defined as contact with other healthcare providers in order to prevent any medicines-related problems (MRPs). Purpose To quantify and characterise PIs at HBA following the identification of any risks of MRPs during prescription validation. Materials and MethodsProspective data collection from 1 July to 30 September and subsequent entering of the data into a PIs database created by the HBA’s DP according to a protocol developed by the DP of Hospital da Luz and Faculdade de Farmácia da Universidade de Lisboa. Results During the period of analysis, 914 PIs were recorded for a total of 280 patients (an average of 3.3 PIs per patient), with the following distribution: 242 PIs in Intensive Care units, 400 in the Medical Specialties, 214 in the Surgical Specialties and 58 in other units. The most frequent causes of PIs were: unsuitable use of medicine due to the renal function (n = 420 [46.0%]); potential adverse effect/toxicity (n = 139 [15.2%]); and lack of therapeutic efficacy (n = 112 [12.3%]). The most frequent PIs were therapeutic drug monitoring (n = 343 [37.5%]); suggestions regarding parameters found in blood tests (n = 241 [26.4%]); adjustments to dose and frequency of administration (n = 106 [11.6%]); adjustments to route of administration and medicine formulation (n = 07 [11.7%]). As for the expected effects of PI, the most frequent were: increased effectiveness (n = 548 [60.0%]); reduced drug toxicity (n = 205 [22.4%]); reduced risk associated with route of administration (n = 104 [11.4%]). Concerning the results of PI, the most frequent were: no clinical improvement/no clinical aggravation (n = 289 [31.6%]); problem prevented (n = 248 [27.1%]); clinical improvement (n = 238 [26.0%]). Of all PIs, 813 (88.9%) were accepted, and 328 (35.9%) of all PIs were recorded in the patient’s electronic medical record. Conclusions The high acceptance of PIs confirms the interdisciplinary cooperation of all the healthcare providers within the institution. The results show that PI is fundamental in promoting the good use of medicines and preventing MRPs. The development of a software application integrated in the electronic medical record will allow us to be more agile in documentation and to quantify the pharmacist’s contribution within the clinical team. No conflict of interest.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.