Artificial light at night (ALAN) is a widespread alteration of the natural environment that can affect the functioning of ecosystems. ALAN can change the movement patterns of freshwater animals that move into the adjacent riparian and terrestrial ecosystems, but the implications for local riparian consumers that rely on these subsidies are still unexplored. We conducted a 2-year field experiment to quantify changes of freshwater-terrestrial linkages by installing streetlights in a previously light-naïve riparian area adjacent to an agricultural drainage ditch. We compared the abundance and community composition of emerging aquatic insects, flying insects, and ground-dwelling arthropods with an unlit control site. Comparisons were made within and between years using two-way generalized least squares (GLS) model and a BACI design (BeforeAfter Control-Impact). Aquatic insect emergence, the proportion of flying insects that were aquatic in origin, and the total abundance of flying insects all increased in the ALAN-illuminated area. The abundance of several night-active ground-dwelling predators (Pachygnatha clercki, Trochosa sp., Opiliones) increased under ALAN and their activity was extended into the day. Conversely, the abundance of nocturnal ground beetles (Carabidae) decreased under ALAN. The changes in composition of riparian predator and scavenger communities suggest that the increase in aquatic-to-terrestrial subsidy flux may cascade through the riparian food web. The work is among the first studies to experimentally manipulate ALAN using a large-scale field experiment, and provides evidence that ALAN can affect processes that link adjacent ecosystems. Given the large number of streetlights that are installed along shorelines of freshwater bodies throughout the globe, the effects could be widespread and represent an underestimated source of impairment for both aquatic and riparian systems.

Correlations of Reichardt's ET(30), the Catalán SdP (solvent dipolarity), SP (solvent polarizability), SA (solvent acidity), SB (solvent basicity), Kamlet‐Taft π* (dipolarity/polarizability), α (hydrogen bond donating ability) and β (hydrogen bond accepting ability) polarity parameters with the molar concentration of 161 pure organic solvents are presented. Mostly, linear relationships of the polarity parameter as a function of molar concentration are obtained as long as each individual solvent class is considered separately. A physically different interpretation of the ET(30), Kamlet‐Taft π* and α as well as Catalán SA and SB parameters has been proposed. Furthermore, the Hildebrand solubility parameter in combination with the diffraction index is used for the correlation analysis with the above‐mentioned solvent parameters. It can be concluded that empirical polarity parameters derived from solvatochromic UV/Vis measurements are inherently a function of the molecular structure of the probe.

The DHBD quantity represents the hydroxyl group density of alcoholic solvents or water. DHBD is purely physically defined by the product of molar concentration of the solvent (N) and the factor Σn=n×f which reflects the number n and position (f‐factor) of the alcoholic OH groups per molecule. Whether the hydroxyl group is either primary, secondary or tertiary is taken into account by f. Σn is clearly linearly correlated with the physical density or the refractive index of the alcohol derivative. Relationships of solvent‐dependent UV/Vis absorption energies as ET(30) values, 129Xe NMR shifts and kinetic data of 2‐chloro‐2‐methylpropane solvolysis with DHBD are demonstrated. It can be shown that the ET(30) solvent parameter reflects the global polarity of the hydrogen bond network rather than specific H‐bond acidity. Significant correlations of the log k1 rate constants of the solvolysis reaction of 2‐chloro‐2‐methylpropane with DHBD show the physical reasoning of the approach.

The Kamlet–Taft dipolarity/polarizability parameters π* for various ionic liquids were determined using 4-tert-butyl-2-((dicyanomethylene)-5-[4-N,N-diethylamino)-benzylidene]-Δ3-thiazoline and 5-(N,N-dimethylamino)-5′-nitro-2,2′-bithiophene as solvatochromic probes.

The solvatochromicity of established solvatochromic UV/Vis probes, which appear to be sensitive to the so-called hydrogen bond donor (HBD) property of the solvent, is analysed using the hydroxyl group density of alcoholic solvents D HBD as a physical parameter in comparison to the pKa, the chemical benchmark for acidity. Reichardt's dye B30, Kosowers Z-indicator 1-ethyl-4-(methoxycarbonyl) pyridinium iodide (K), Kamlet-Tafts α, Dragos S parameter, Catalans SA scale, the cis-dicyano-bis (1,10phenanthroline) iron II complex (Schilt's Ferrocyphen dye, Fe) and Gutmann's acceptor number (AN) have been investigated. The observed dependencies of the empirical polarity parameters as a function of D HBD for several alcoholic solvent families requires a ompletely new physicochemical understanding of these established HBD parameters. Only the AN scale (or Fe) is able to bridge the gap between global polarity and acidity, provided the values are interpreted correctly and applied accordingly.

The solvatochromic ThTCF probe responds to anion coordination. Correlations of UV/Vis data from ThTCF with various basicity-related polarity scales (Kamlet-Taft β, Freire EHB, Laurence β1) allow an evaluation of their physical significance.

Highlights d Myosin-18B lacks ATPase activity and harbors four actin binding domains d This unconventional myosin serves as an actin cross-linker and motor modulator d Myosin-18B incorporation into muscle stress fibers coincides with striation onset d Myosin-18B regulates cardiac sarcomere organization from within thick filaments

No abstract