In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field

[Abstract unavailable

Research in autophagy continues to accelerate,(1) and as a result many new scientists are entering the field. Accordingly, it is important to establish a standard set of criteria for monitoring macroautophagy in different organisms. Recent reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose.(2,3) There are many useful and convenient methods that can be used to monitor macroautophagy in yeast, but relatively few in other model systems, and there is much confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure macroautophagy in higher eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers of autophagosomes versus those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway; thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from fully functional autophagy that includes delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of the methods that can be used by investigators who are attempting to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as by reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that investigate these processes. This set of guidelines is not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to verify an autophagic response.

No abstract

The absence of the outer mitochondrial membrane protein Uth1p was found to induce resistance to rapamycin treatment and starvation, two conditions that induce the autophagic process. Biochemical studies showed the onset of a fully active autophagic activity both in wild-type and ⌬uth1 strains. On the other hand, the disorganization of the mitochondrial network induced by rapamycin treatment or 15 h of nitrogen starvation was followed in cells expressing mitochondria-targeted green fluorescent protein; a rapid colocalization of green fluorescent protein fluorescence with vacuole-selective FM4-64 labeling was observed in the wild-type but not in the ⌬uth1 strain. Degradation of mitochondrial proteins, followed by Western blot analysis, did not occur in mutant strains carrying null mutations of the vacuolar protease Pep4p, the autophagyspecific protein Atg5p, and Uth1p. These data show that, although the autophagic machinery was fully functional in the absence of Uth1p, this protein is involved in the autophagic degradation of mitochondria.The major cellular degradation pathways involved in protein and organelle turnover are autophagy and proteasome-mediated proteolysis. These processes are important for maintaining a controlled balance between anabolism and catabolism in order to have normal cell growth and development. These degradation pathways permit the cell to eliminate unwanted or unnecessary organelles and recycle the components for reuse. In eukaryotic cells, the lysosomes or the vacuole are major degradative organelles that contain a range of hydrolases able of degrading all the cellular constituents. During the last decade, autophagy has emerged as a crucial membrane trafficking process that transports bulk cytoplasm and sometimes entire organelles to the lysosome/vacuole for recycling in response to nutrient starvation or under specific physiological conditions (see Refs. 1 and 2 for reviews). Autophagy has two major forms, microautophagy and macroautophagy. Microautophagy operates by protruding or invaginating a portion of the vacuolar membrane to engulf cytosol or organelles. Only limited knowledge is available about microautophagy, which has been best characterized for the degradation of peroxisomes (3, 4) and selective portions of the nucleus (5). Macroautophagy, of which the molecular aspects are better characterized, involves the non-selective sequestration of large portions of the cytoplasm into double membrane structures termed autophagosomes and their delivery to the vacuole for degradation.Although the normal function of autophagy is thought to provide amino acids to starved cells, a fair amount of evidence suggests that it could also be required for the elimination of selected organelles, namely mitochondria, under peculiar conditions.

SummaryAdenine nucleotide translocator (ANT) is a mitochondrial inner membrane protein involved in the ADP/ATP exchange and is a component of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (PTP). In mammalian apoptosis, the PTP can mediate mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP), which is suspected to be responsible for the release of apoptogenic factors, including cytochrome c. Although release of cytochrome c in yeast apoptosis has previously been reported, it is not known how it occurs. Herein we used yeast genetics to investigate whether depletion of proteins putatively involved in MOMP and cytochrome c release affects these processes in yeast. While deletion of POR1 (yeast voltagedependent anion channel) enhances apoptosis triggered by acetic acid, H 2O2 and diamide, CPR3 (mitochondrial cyclophilin) deletion had no effect. Absence of ADP/ATP carrier (AAC) proteins, yeast orthologues of ANT, protects cells exposed to acetic acid and diamide but not to H2O2. Expression of a mutated form of Aac2p (op1) exhibiting very low ADP/ ATP translocase activity indicates that AAC's prodeath role does not require translocase activity. Absence of AAC proteins impairs MOMP and release of cytochrome c, which, together with other mitochondrial inner membrane proteins, is degraded. Our findings point to a crucial role of AAC in yeast apoptosis.

Mitochondria are essential to oxidative energy production in aerobic eukaryotic cells, where they are also required for multiple biosynthetic pathways to take place. Mitochondrial homeostasis also plays a crucial role in ageing and programmed cell death, and recent data have suggested that mitochondria degradation is a strictly regulated process. Autophagy is an evolutionary conserved mechanism that provides cells with a mechanism for the continuous turnover of damaged and obsolete macromolecules and organelles. In this work, we investigated mitochondria degradation by autophagy. Electron microscopy observations of yeast cells submitted to nitrogen starvation after growth on different carbon sources provided evidence that microautophagy, rather than macroautophagy, preferentially occurred in cells grown under nonfermentable conditions. The observation of mitochondria degradation showed that both a selective process and a nonselective process of mitochondria autophagy occurred successively. In a yeast strain inactivated for the gene UTH1, the selective process was not observed.

SummaryWe have previously shown that acetic acid activates a mitochondria-dependent death process in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and that the ADP/ATP carrier (AAC) is required for mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization and cytochrome c release. Mitochondrial fragmentation and degradation have also been shown in response to this death stimulus. Herein, we show that autophagy is not active in cells undergoing acetic acid-induced apoptosis and is therefore not responsible for mitochondrial degradation. Furthermore, we found that the vacuolar protease Pep4p and the AAC proteins have a role in mitochondrial degradation using yeast genetic approaches. Depletion and overexpression of Pep4p, an orthologue of human cathepsin D, delays and enhances mitochondrial degradation respectively. Moreover, Pep4p is released from the vacuole into the cytosol in response to acetic acid treatment. AAC-deleted cells also show a decrease in mitochondrial degradation in response to acetic acid and are not defective in Pep4p release. Therefore, AAC proteins seem to affect mitochondrial degradation at a step subsequent to Pep4p release, possibly triggering degradation through their involvement in mitochondrial permeabilization. The finding that both mitochondrial AAC proteins and the vacuolar Pep4p interfere with mitochondrial degradation suggests a complex regulation and interplay between mitochondria and the vacuole in yeast programmed cell death.