Cryopreserved human hepatocytes have been used to predict hepatic in-vivo clearance. Physiologically-based direct scaling methods generally underestimate human in-vivo hepatic clearance. Cryopreserved human hepatocytes were incubated in 100% serum and in serum-free medium to predict the in-vivo hepatic clearance of six compounds (phenazone (antipyrine), bosentan, mibefradil, midazolam, naloxone and oxazepam). Monte Carlo simulations were performed in an attempt to incorporate the variability and uncertainty in the measured parameters to the prediction of hepatic clearance. The intrinsic clearance (CL(int)) and the associated variability of the six compounds decreased in the presence of serum and the values were reproducible across donors. The predicted CL(hep, in-vivo) obtained with hepatocytes from donors incubated in serum was more accurate than the prediction obtained in the absence of serum. For example, the CL(hep, in-vivo) of mibefradil in donor GNG was 4.27 mL min(-1) kg(-1) in the presence of serum and 0.46 mL min(-1) kg(-1) in the absence of serum (4.88 mL min(-1) kg(-1) observed in-vivo). Using the results obtained in this study together with an extended data set (26 compounds), the clearance of 77% of the compounds was predicted within a 2-fold error in the absence of serum. In the presence of serum, 85% of the compounds were successfully predicted within a 2-fold error. In conclusion, cryopreserved human hepatocyte suspensions represented a convenient and predictive model to assess human drug clearance.

No abstract

Various incubation conditions of human hepatocytes were compared for their accuracy in predicting the in vivo hepatic clearance (CL(H)) of model compounds. The test compounds were the highly cleared, low protein bound naloxone (in vivo CL(H) = 25 ml min(-1) kg(-1); free fraction = 0.6), the medium clearance, highly protein bound midazolam (CL(H) = 12 ml min(-1) kg(-1); free fraction = 0.04) and the low clearance, highly protein bound bosentan (CL(H) = 3.9 ml min(-1) kg(-1); free fraction = 0.02). Each compound was tested in three 'hepatocyte systems', using resections from three donors, in the presence and absence of human serum. Those hepatocyte systems were: conventional primary cultures, freshly isolated suspensions and cryopreserved suspended hepatocytes. Except for a twofold overestimated CL(H) for bosentan from conventional primary cultures, and despite variable cryopreservation recoveries, similar predictions of CL(H) were recorded with all hepatocyte systems. Moreover, the CL(H) values obtained with cryopreserved suspended hepatocytes were similar to those obtained with freshly isolated suspensions. For midazolam and bosentan, the predicted in vivo CL(H) was markedly higher in the presence of serum, whereas serum had little influence on the scaled-up CL(H) of naloxone. In vivo, CL(H) was properly approached for naloxone and bosentan (particularly from experiments in the presence of serum), but it was strongly underestimated for midazolam (particularly in the absence of serum). Additional compounds need to be investigated to confirm the above findings as well as to assess why the clearances of some highly protein-bound compounds are still considerably underestimated.

Strategies used to screen new drug entities as potential inhibitors of CYP450 enzymes are now widely used to select candidates in the drug discovery process. However, the information obtained based on IC50 values are usually more of qualitative nature. The aim of this study was to find out whether a more quantitative assessment of interaction potential could be achieved on the basis of the ratio I/Ki (I corresponds to inhibitor concentration). Ki values, in vivo data, namely plasma exposures under control condition vs in presence of inhibitors, were obtained from literature for 36 compounds. For a quantitative assessment, the following inhibitor concentrations were considered: I max and I in,max (respectively, maximum I in systemic circulation and in portal vein), I max,u and I in,max,u (respectively, maximum unbound I in systemic circulation and in portal vein). The predicted interaction was calculated as AUCinhibitor/AUCcontrol = 1 + I/Ki, where AUCcontrol and AUCinhibitor represent, respectively, the area under curve of the plasma concentration vs time profile under control conditions (ie without inhibitor) and with inhibitor. The use of I/Ki allowed a more quantitative estimation of the interaction potential. In this context, protein binding appeared to be a key parameter to be considered to avoid overestimation of DDI potential. Thus, 60% successful predictions could be achieved based on the ratio I max,u/Ki. Yet, some major deviations between in vivo DDI were obtained with this approach and the observations on the relevance of the inhibitor concentrations and the impact of binding need to be interpreted very cautiously in the absence of information on additional parameters such as fm and fh for example.