The objective of the article was to analyze the dialectic of rights and responsibilities in education. The importance of education is so great that the thesis of the responsibility of the person to receive education has now been recognized. In order for the right to education to be exercised, the domestic law of states provides for a set of responsibilities for participants in the educational process, the implementation of which actually guarantees access to education. The real economic opportunities of States have a great impact on the real content of the dialectical process of interaction of rights and responsibilities in the field of education. The relationship between the participants in the educational process is regulated at several levels: first, the rules of domestic law and then the contractual level, represented by the statutes of educational institutions, comes into force. It is concluded that, in the most advanced systems, there may be a level of intra-group agreements that are completely voluntary. The practical content of the educational process is influenced by several factors, including ideology, the objectives set by a given society, the traditions and customs that have developed in it.
The article explores the concepts of sources of law and their main types. The source of law means the way of external influence of legal norms, which certifies their binding nature. The concepts and place of judicial precedent in the system of sources of law are defined. It is noted that judicial precedent should be understood as a court decision rendered in a particular case and entered into force, and which is the basis for resolving similar cases by other bodies. As part of the integration process in Europe, two important judicial bodies have been formed – the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter – the ECtHR) and the Court of Justice. Each of these courts plays an important role in the rule-making process within its competence. The ECtHR's function is not limited to dealing with specific complaints. Its decisions also provide a comprehensive interpretation of the main provisions of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. As a result, they acquire a special significance that is precedent-setting. Therefore, the application of the case law of the ECtHR is considered as a source of law. It is also noted that EU courts play a role in the development of the rule-making process within the EU. They interpret the main provisions of the founding treaties and other regulations and formulate autonomous concepts and concepts that complement and clarify the provisions of regulations and implement new fundamentally important for the development of integration law provisions. Recognition of judicial precedent as a source of law means that judicial bodies perform not only a jurisdictional function (resolving conflicts on the basis of law), but also law-making. This function increases the role and importance of the judiciary in the mechanism of checks and balances of abuse of state power.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.