The objective of the article was to analyze the dialectic of rights and responsibilities in education. The importance of education is so great that the thesis of the responsibility of the person to receive education has now been recognized. In order for the right to education to be exercised, the domestic law of states provides for a set of responsibilities for participants in the educational process, the implementation of which actually guarantees access to education. The real economic opportunities of States have a great impact on the real content of the dialectical process of interaction of rights and responsibilities in the field of education. The relationship between the participants in the educational process is regulated at several levels: first, the rules of domestic law and then the contractual level, represented by the statutes of educational institutions, comes into force. It is concluded that, in the most advanced systems, there may be a level of intra-group agreements that are completely voluntary. The practical content of the educational process is influenced by several factors, including ideology, the objectives set by a given society, the traditions and customs that have developed in it.
The article is devoted to the peculiarities of determining the territorial jurisdiction of martial law, because on February 24, 2022 the Law of Ukraine “On Approval of the Decree of the President of Ukraine” On martial law in Ukraine “in connection with the military aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine was imposed martial law, which continues today. The issues of determining the territorial jurisdiction of court cases were covered in the works of G. Shershenevich, I. Pobirchenko, V. Shcherbina, V. Belyanevich, D. Prityka, V. Chernadchuk, M. Smokovich, V. Sukhonos, V. Nagrebelny, O. Kharitonova, I. Balyuk, but in the context of martial law, they acquired a new meaning. The purpose of the article is to highlight the peculiarities of determining the territorial jurisdiction of court cases under martial law. Research methods: the following methods are applied. Formal-logical – for the formation of new concepts, their classification; eliminating inaccuracies and contradictions, etc. Formal dogmatic, or legal method, based on the use of rules of formal logic for knowledge of law, is a traditional, inherent in legal science, since it proceeds from its nature. Its essence is in the formulation and disclosure of legal concepts, the construction of legal structures, and clarification of the actual content of the law. At all stages of scientific research the dialectical method is used. This method determines the paths of any scientific study. It helps to explore all the phenomena in the relationship, interdependence. Comparative method involves comparing single-order legal concepts, phenomena and processes to establish similarities and account for differences between them. The article analyzes the provisions of current legislation, the main scientific approaches to defining the concept of jurisdiction of court cases, as well as case law in this area. In addition, bills №7315 on amendments to the Law of Ukraine “On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges” on martial law or state of emergency and №7316 on amendments to the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine, the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine and the Commercial Procedure Code of Ukraine are considered (concerning the administration of justice in a state of war or emergency). As a result, it is concluded that digitalization issues related to determining the territorial jurisdiction of martial law are relevant and practical, as they promote the implementation and protection of citizens’ rights and establish effective mechanisms for wartime justice. Because the courts are objects of critical infrastructure, and therefore the implementation of justice in our country does not stop and the right of citizens to judicial protection can not be limited. Key words: court proceedings, territorial jurisdiction, martial law
The aim of the article was to analyze the state of the digital transformation of administrative services in various fields of activity. The main methodological tools were statistical, graphical, comparative analysis, and observation methods. The research found that national governments are taking a large number of initiatives related to digital public services. The DESI Index has shown itself to good advantage in the EU. It ranks Member States according to their digital performance and analyses their progress in providing e-government services. The AuroraAI programed developed in Finland will contribute to the improvement of electronic administrative services, smooth daily life, business, safe and ethical approach. The Finnish web portal My Kanta provides a wide range of applications that can be of benefit to citizens, healthcare professionals and organizations, government bodies. In Ukraine, the smooth functioning of the Diia web portal promotes the spread of digital skills, the inclusion of citizens in relation to receiving digital administrative services during the period of hostilities. Global geopolitical transformations have focused the efforts of states on strengthening intersectoral cooperation of public authorities in the digitalization of administrative services. The availability of such services for the elderly remains unresolved. The adaptation of the positive practices of the government of Finland in Ukraine will become a vector for further research and thorough studies during the post-war reconstruction of the state. Particular attention will be paid to the issue of availability of the services under research.
Historical quarters in cities are a living embodiment of people’s culture and their collective memory, which preserve their heritage and past achievements. Urban identity depends on meeting the current needs while preserving the past. At the same time, urbanization exercise pressure on most countries, therefore they require updating administrative law regulation tools capable of protecting the identity of the rich national heritage. The aim of the article was a comparative legal analysis of the realities and prospects of preservation of historical districts of cities in the context of the practice of administrative law regulation of Ukraine and the Federal Republic of Germany. The methods of comparative legal analysis and observation were the leading methodological tools. The research revealed specific physical, socio-economic, and socio-cultural factors of urbanization, which caused noticeable and significant changes in the features of the administrative law tools that regulate urban planning. It was established that the widespread German concept providing that every planning act of a lower-level body must take into account certain mandatory provisions established by the acts of higher-level bodies is gradually being tested in Ukraine. It is substantiated that the armed aggression of the Russian Federation forces Ukraine to take further actions to build new safe real estate objects and preserving historically significant buildings that were damaged by war. In this context, the national administrative law tools that regulate urban planning in Ukraine will also be transformed. The vector of further scientific research will be a comparison of the practice of implementing administrative law tools that regulate urban planning in terms of post-war reconstruction in the selected states.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.