Background There is an unmet alternative medical therapy for BCG unresponsive patients. Objective To report efficacy of intravesical gemcitabine in NMIBC patients, who failed a previous course of BCG, or intolerant, and unwilling to undergo radical cystectomy (RC). Material and methods This is an open‐label, single‐arm study, which enrolled patients showing a failure or were intolerant to BCG and unwilling to undergo the RC. Intravesical gemcitabine was administered once a week for six consecutive weeks and once a month for 12 months. The primary outcome was DFS defined as the lack of a tumor on cystoscopy and negative urine cytology. Secondary endpoint was safety defined according a grading of side effects. OS, PFS, and DFS were described with Kaplan–Meier method at 12 and 24 months. Results and limitations Overall 36 patients were enrolled. The median follow‐up was 27 months. The DFS was 68.75% at the end of induction phase and 44.44% and 31.66% at 12 and 24 months of, respectively. The PFS was 43.75%. The OS and CSS were 77.9% (95% CI 58.78%‐88.92%) and 80.68% (95% CI 61.49%‐90.96%), respectively. There was no life threatening event or treatment‐related death (grade 4 or 5). The most common mild and moderate adverse events reported were urinary symptoms (LUTS) and fatigue (G1‐G2). Conclusion Patients who presented an unresponsive‐BCG recurrent NMIBC and unwilling to receive a RC, could benefit from intravesical gemcitabine as salvage organ‐sparing treatment.

No abstract

BACKGROUND: MRI has been proposed as a new staging tool for bladder cancer (BC), but use is limited by its high costs and low availability. 29-MHz high-resolution micro-ultrasound (mUS) technology has been suggested as an alternative to detect BC and distinguish between muscle-invasive and non-muscle invasive BC. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of mUS vs. magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in differentiating NMIBC and MIBC at definitive pathological examination. METHODS: This is a prospective study of patients with a primary diagnosis of BC with either positive urine cytology (UC) or negative UC and a tumor size >  25 mm from a tertiary care high volume center. mUS, with the ExactVu system with an EV29L 29 MHz side-fire transducer, and a 3-Tesla MRI were performed before transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) in every patient before undergoing TURBT. We compared the imaging results with pathological reports. RESULTS: The analyzed population consisted of 58 individuals. The reported mUS and MRI sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values were 85.0%, 76.3%, 65.4%, and 90.6%, versus 85.0%, 50.0%, 47.2%, and 86.4%, respectively. In accuracy analysis, the AUC for mUS and MRI were respectively 0.807 and 0.675. CONCLUSIONS: In our population mUS seems to have a better performance in distinguishing NMIBC from MIBC. The main limitation of mUS is the probe shape that makes its use problematic in cases with a large prostate and inadequate rectal preparation. Further studies with a larger population are ongoing to compare and validate these techniques in this setting.