The mechanisms and pathways of the sensation of dyspnea are incompletely understood, but recent studies have provided some clarification. Studies of patients with cord transection or polio, induced spinal anesthesia, or induced respiratory muscle paralysis indicate that activation of the respiratory muscles is not essential for the perception of dyspnea. Similarly, reflex chemostimulation by CO₂ causes dyspnea, even in the presence of respiratory muscle paralysis or cord transection, indicating that reflex chemoreceptor stimulation per se is dyspnogenic. Sensory afferents in the vagus nerves have been considered to be closely associated with dyspnea, but the data were conflicting. However, recent studies have provided evidence of pulmonary vagal C-fiber involvement in the genesis of dyspnea, and recent animal data provide a basis to reconcile differences in responses to various C-fiber stimuli, based on the ganglionic origin of the C fibers. Brain imaging studies have provided information on central pathways subserving dyspnea: Dyspnea is associated with activation of the limbic system, especially the insular area. These findings permit a clearer understanding of the mechanisms of dyspnea: Afferent information from reflex stimulation of the peripheral sensors (chemoreceptors and/or vagal C fibers) is processed centrally in the limbic system and sensorimotor cortex and results in increased neural output to the respiratory muscles. A perturbation in the ventilatory response due to weakness, paralysis, or increased mechanical load generates afferent information from vagal receptors in the lungs (and possibly mechanoreceptors in the respiratory muscles) to the sensorimotor cortex and results in the sensation of dyspnea.
Intravenous adenosine for the treatment of supraventricular tachycardia is reported to cause bronchospasm and dyspnea and to increase ventilation in humans, but these effects have not been systematically studied. We therefore compared the effects of 10 mg of intravenous adenosine with placebo in 21 normal subjects under normoxic conditions and evaluated the temporal sequence of the effects of adenosine on ventilation, dyspnea, and heart rate. The study was repeated in 11 of these subjects during hyperoxia. In all subjects, adenosine resulted in the development of dyspnea, assessed by handgrip dynamometry, without any significant change (P > 0.1) in lung resistance as measured by the interrupter technique. There were significant increases (P < 0.05) in ventilation and heart rate in response to adenosine. The dyspneic response occurred slightly before the ventilatory or heart rate responses in every subject, but the timing of the dyspneic, ventilatory, and heart rate responses was not significantly different when the group data were analyzed (18.9 +/- 5.8, 20.3 +/- 5.5, and 19.7 +/- 4.5 s, respectively). During hyperoxia, adenosine resulted in similar effects, with no significant differences in the magnitude of the ventilatory response; however, compared with the normoxic state, the intensity of the dyspneic response was significantly (P < 0.05) reduced, whereas the heart rate response increased significantly (P < 0.05). These data indicate that intravenous adenosine-induced dyspnea is not associated with bronchospasm in normal subjects. The time latency of the response indicates that the dyspnea is probably not a consequence of peripheral chemoreceptor or brain stem respiratory center stimulation, suggesting that it is most likely secondary to stimulation of receptors in the lungs, most likely vagal C fibers.
This single-catheter, low-flow ECCO2R system provided clinically useful levels of CO2 removal in these patients with COPD. The system appears to be a potentially valuable additional modality for the treatment of hypercapnic respiratory failure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.