No abstract

An advisory panel of academicians, private practice physicians, nurse clinicians, and research nurses was chosen to develop guidelines (minimum standards) for the treatment of arterial insufficiency ulcers of the lower extremities. METHODSPrevious guidelines, meta-analyses, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, recent review articles of arterial ulcer treatment, and the Medicare/CMS consensus of usual treatment of chronic wounds were all searched and reviewed for evidence. Guidelines were formulated, the underlying principle(s) enumerated, and evidence references listed and coded. The code abbreviations for the evidence citations were as follows: There were major differences between our approach to evidence citations and past approaches to evidence-based guidelines. Most past approaches relied only on publications regarding clinical human studies. Laboratory or animal studies were not cited. We have used well-controlled animal studies that present proof of principle, especially when a clinical series corroborated the laboratory results.

This single-catheter, low-flow ECCO2R system provided clinically useful levels of CO2 removal in these patients with COPD. The system appears to be a potentially valuable additional modality for the treatment of hypercapnic respiratory failure.

Innovations in technology are used in managing chronic wounds. Despite the wide range of technologies available, healing of chronic wounds remains variable. In this paper, the authors offer an evidence based approach to the use of technology for diagnosis and management based on the concept of standardised care.