Background: The aim of study was to evaluate the oral health status, salivary flow and halitosis among individuals diagnosed with leprosy as compared with healthy subjects. Material and Methods: A sample of 160 individuals was allocated into four groups, as follows: (G1) individuals with complete leprosy treatment; (G2) individuals diagnosed with leprosy and under multi-drug therapy; (G3) individuals diagnosed with leprosy not yet under treatment; and (G4) healthy individuals. Then individuals were submitted to periodontal clinical examination (visible plaque index, bleeding index, depth of probing and clinical attachment level); DMFT index (decayed-missing-filled teeth index); evaluation of salivary flow and halitosis using a halimeter equipment (Interscan Corp, Chatsworth, CA, USA). Results: The data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests. The mean DMFT was found to be higher than 6.6, which is considered very high, with no significant difference between groups (P>0.05). As for salivary flow, 76.2% of the subjects presented normal flow rates, while 10% and 13.7% showed low and very low salivary flow rates, respectively, with hyposalivation being mostly observed in Groups 1 and 2. The highest prevalence of noticeable odor was found in healthy individuals (G4), and the most prevalent periodontal diagnosis was gingivitis (63.1%) in Group 3 (individuals with leprosy not yet under multi-drug therapy) followed by periodontitis (25%) in Group 1 (individuals who had completed leprosy treatment). Conclusions: It was observed that individuals with a history of leprosy present poor oral health similar to that of systemically healthy individuals.
Leprosy has been eliminated as a public pathological state in most of development countries like Indonesia, however the social stigma to the sickness continues to be terribly high. This study was performed to research the role of social stigma as a determinant for infectious disease elimination in an exceedingly infectious disease endemic region of Indonesia. Focus cluster discussions, in-depth interviews and structured questionnaires were accustomed investigate infectious disease social stigma among lepers, their contacts and an effect cluster consisting of patients attending a hospital for reasons aside from infectious disease. consent was wanted and gained before beginning the study. Focus cluster discussions and in-depth interviews known 3 kindsof stigma; lack of vanity, social group stigma and complete rejection by society. From the 480 structured questionnaires administered, there have been over- all positive attitudes to lepers among the study population and inside the divisions (P=0.0). The proportion of participants that felt sympa- thetic with distorted lepers was 78.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 74.4-81.8%] from a complete of 480. 300 and 99 (83.1%) respondents indicated that they may share a meal or drink at constant table with a distorted leper (95% CI: 79.7-86.5%). 103 (83.9%) participants indicated that they may have an acknowledgment and embrace a distorted leper (95% CI: 87- 87.3%). a complete of 85.2% (95.0% CI: 81.9-88.4%) participants thoroughbred that they may move with a distorted leper to the market or mosque. A high proportion of 71.5% (95.0% CI: 67.5%-75.5%) participants expressed that they may supply employment to a distorted leper. The results indicate that Sitanala 1 division had very cheap mean score of 3.3 on positive attitudes to infectious disease compared with Sitanala 2 (4.1) and Sitanala 3 (4.8) divisions.The high proportion of positive attitudes among the participants and in numerous divisions may be a positive indicator that the elimination of infectious disease social stigma is progressing within the right direction. Quantification of stigma to assess the elimination struggle may be a new analysis space publicly health.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.