In a cohort of patients at risk of developing CIN, we could not detect any significant benefit of the use of ascorbic acid, NAC, or a combination of both drugs over the standard hydration regimen in preventing CIN.

Background Rivaroxaban has been recently introduced for the management of non-valvular intra-cardiac thrombosis with variable results. We aimed to compare the results of the off-label use of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in the management of patients with left ventricle (LV) thrombus. This research is a retrospective study conducted on 63 patients who had LV thrombus from January to December 2016. We compared patients treated with warfarin (n=35) to patients who had rivaroxaban (n=28), and study outcomes were time to thrombus resolution, bleeding, stroke, and mortality. Results The median duration of treatment was 9.5 (25th-75th percentiles: 6-32.5) months for rivaroxaban and 14 (3-41) months for warfarin. Thrombus resolution occurred in 24 patients in the warfarin group (68.6%) and 20 patients in the rivaroxaban group (71.4%). The median time to resolution in the warfarin group was 9 (4-20) months and 3 (2-11.5) months in the rivaroxaban group. Thrombus resolution was significantly faster in patients on rivaroxaban (p= 0.019). Predictors of thrombus resolution were thrombus surface area (HR: 1.21; CI 95% (1.0-1.46); p= .048) and the use of rivaroxaban (HR: 1.92; CI 95% (1.01-3.65); p= 0.048). There was no difference in stroke, bleeding, and mortality between both groups. Conclusion Rivaroxaban was as effective and safe as warfarin in managing patients with left ventricle thrombus. Larger randomized clinical trials are recommended to confirm our findings.

BackgroundThe association of hyponatremia with cognitive impairment and mobility in heart failure (HF) patients is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine if hyponatremia is associated with cognitive and mobility impairment as measured by simple, validated, and time-sensitive tests.Material/MethodsThis was a prospective study in patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction (HFrEF, HFpEF) seen in outpatient HF clinics. Hyponatremia was defined as sodium level ≤136 mEq/L. Cognitive function was measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) tool, and mobility was measured with the Timed Up and Go test (TUG-t).ResultsA total of 121 patients were evaluated; 30% were hyponatremic (134±1.9 mEq/l, range 128–136 mEq/l). Overall, 92% of hyponatremic patients had cognitive impairment (MoCA <26) compared to 76% of the non-hyponatremic patients [relative risk 1.2 (confidence interval: 1.02–1.4, p=0.02)]. In regard to mobility, 72% of hyponatremic patients and 62% of non-hyponatremic patients (p=0.4) had TUG-t times that were considered to be worse than average. A total of 84% (N=76) of HFrEF and 71% (N=22) of HFpEF patients had cognitive impairment (p=0.86). HFrEF patients had significantly lower overall MoCA scores (21.2±3.7 vs. 23.3±3.6, p=0.006) and similar TUG-t times compared to HFpEF patients.ConclusionsMost heart failure patients (HFrEF and HFpEF) seen in an ambulatory setting had impairment of cognitive function and mobility, with a higher prevalence among those with hyponatremia. Screening can be done using tests that can be administered in a clinical setting.

Background: Reintervention after transcatheter edge to edge repair using MitraClip is still challenging. We aimed to report our experience in reinterventions after MitraClip procedures and describe the outcomes. Methods: From 2012 to 2020, 167 patients had a transcatheter edge to edge repair; 10 of them needed reinterventions. At the time of the first MitraClip, the median EuroSCORE was 4.29 (2.62-7.52), and the ejection fraction was 30 (20-40)%. Results: Emergency mitral valve replacement (MVR) was performed in two patients, elective MVR in three, cardiac transplantation in two, and repeat clipping in threepatients. The median time from MitraClip to the reintervention was 4.5 (2-13) months. One patient required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support after elective MVR. Repeat clipping failed to control mitral regurgitation grade in all patients. Clip detachment was reported in five patients (50%). The median follow-up after the reintervention was 19.5 (9-75) months, and mortality occurred in two patients who had repeat clipping (20%). Conclusions: MVR after MitraClip is feasible with low morbidity and mortality. Repeat mitral valve clipping had a high failure rate. Mitral repair was not feasible in all patients in our series, and the use of MitraClip to delay surgical interventions may not be feasible if mitral repair is an option.

Background The optimal venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) cannulation strategy in patients with postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock is still debatable. Studies evaluating the effect of cannulation strategy on long-term survival are scarce. Objectives We investigated the impact of central versus peripheral cannulation strategy for ECMO insertion on hospital outcomes and survival in postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock patients. Methods This retrospective study involved 101 patients who had either central or peripheral ECMO due to postcardiotomy shock between June 2009 and December 2020. Study endpoints were limb ischemia, bleeding, blood transfusion, wound infection, and overall survival. Results Eighty-four patients received central (c) ECMO, and 17 patients had peripheral (p) ECMO. In the group of pECMO, limb ischemia was significantly higher (5 [29.41%] vs 6 [7.14%]; p = .01). Other endpoints were similar in both groups. Thirty-day mortality was nonsignificantly different between both cohorts (cECMO 34 [41.67%] vs pECMO 10 [58.82%]; p = .29). However, overall survival was better with cECMO (Log-rank p = .02). Patients’ age [HR: 1.04 (95% CI: 1.02–1.06); p = .001], pECMO [HR: 1.98 (95% CI: 1.11–3.55), p = .002] and presence of infective endocarditis [HR: 3.54 (95% CI: 1.52–8.24), p = .03] were significant predictors of overall mortality. Conclusions Peripheral ECMO was associated with an increased risk of limb ischemia; however, bleeding, blood transfusion, infection, and 30-day mortality were comparable to central ECMO. Central cannulation was associated with a better 1-year survival rate. Therefore, central cannulation might be the preferred strategy for patients with postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock.

Background The number of MtraClip procedures is increasing, and consequently, the number of patients with residual or recurrent mitral regurgitation (MR). We aimed to characterize patients who had residual versus recurrent MR after MitraClip and report the outcomes of different treatment strategies. Methods From 2012 to 2020, 167 patients had MitraClip. Out of them, 16 patients (9.5%) had residual mitral regurgitation (MR), and 27 patients (16.2%) had recurrent MR. Results The median age in patients with residual MR was 67.5 (59–73) years versus 69 (61–78) years in patients with recurrent MR (p = .87). The etiology of mitral valve disease was functional in 13 patients (81.3%) and 22 patients (84.6%) in residual versus recurrent MR patients (p > .99). Cardiac resynchronization therapy‐defibrillator implantation was higher in patients with residual MR (p = .02). Survival was 93.7% at 1 year, 76.4% at 3 years versus 92.5% at 1 year, and 84.5% at 3 years in residual versus recurrent MR (p = .69). Two patients in the residual MR group had re‐clip, and three had surgery, and in the recurrent MR group, one patient had re‐clip, and two patients had surgery (p = .23). Patients who had re‐clip were older (p = .09). Surgery was associated with 100% survival at 5 years, 63% after medical therapy and the worst survival was reported in re‐clip patients (p = .007). Conclusion The outcomes of patients with residual versus recurrent mitral regurgitation after MitraClip were comparable. Survival could be improved with surgery compared with medical therapy and re‐clip.

Objectives: To evaluate the quality of an anticoagulation clinic in a tertiary hospital and identified factors affecting the time in the therapeutic range (TTR) and its relation to different complications. Methods: This single-center retrospective study conducted between March 2015 and June 2016 included 1914 patients receiving warfarin therapy. They were divided into 4 warfarin indication groups: non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) (n=403), valvular AF (n=227), prosthetic valves (n=700), and venous or pulmonary embolism (n=584). Results: The median age was 56 (25th, 75th percentiles: [45, 67]) years, and 53.2% were female. The median TTR was 0.52 (0.28, 0.76). Low hemoglobin (0.007) and high alkaline phosphatase (0.020) levels negatively affected the TTR. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) was associated with low TTRs. Minor bleeding occurred in 64 (3.35%), gastrointestinal bleeding in 14 (0.7%), and stroke in 41 (2.2%) patients, with no inter-group differences. The TTR was not associated with minor bleeding (odds ratio [OR]=0.49; p =0.09), gastrointestinal bleeding (OR=0.29; p =0.18), or stroke (OR=1.15; p =0.79). Conclusion: Reflecting the real-life experience of anticoagulation control, our patients spend less than half the TTR within the INR. The low target TTR mandates the need to improve service quality and control factors affecting the TTR, including hemoglobin levels and regular visits for patients with VTE.

No abstract