Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has drastically disrupted primary health care and pharmacy services, posing a challenge in people with chronic diseases who receive routine care. Currently, there exists limited literature on the indirect impact of the pandemic on chronic disease management, particularly related to accessibility to medications and health care resources. Objectives: To determine the prevalence of medical-and medication-related problems reported by people with chronic diseases during the pandemic. The secondary objective was to identify the barriers and contributing factors related to these medical-and medication-related problems. Methods: The anonymous and voluntary, Web-based survey was filled out by interested adult respondents with chronic disease(s) across Michigan between September 1, 2020, and January 1, 2021. The primary outcome included self-reported medical-and medication-related problems during the pandemic. Secondary outcomes included potential risk factors for medicaland medication-related problems. Descriptive statistics was used to describe respondents' demographics, chronic disease characteristics, medication adherence, medical-and medication-related problems, and COVID-19erelated factors. The multivariable Firth logistic regression was used to analyze correlations between potential risk factors associated with medical-and medication-related problems. Results: A total of 1103 respondents completed the survey and were included in the analysis. Approximately, 51% of respondents reported a medication-related problem with 19.6% reported problems obtaining medication(s) and 31.7% reported forgetting or not taking their medication(s). The top reason for problems obtaining medication(s) was doctor's office being closed for in-person visit(s). In addition, of all responses, more than half reported worsening symptoms of their chronic disease(s) during the pandemic especially with psychiatric disorders (79.5%) and inflammatory bowel disease (60%). Respondents with a significantly higher risk of medication-related problems included those who were younger, were female, and had psychiatric disorder(s), diabetes, arthritis, or lupus, and respondents with a significantly higher risk of medical-related problems included those with multiple chronic diseases, psychiatric disorder(s), and heart failure. Conclusion: Understanding the consequences of the pandemic, such as medical-and medication-related problems, in this population is critical to improving health care accessibility and resources through potential outpatient pharmacy services during this and future pandemics.

Coronary arteriovenous (AV) fistula is a rare congenital anomaly, mostly diagnosed incidentally during routine coronary angiography. We report a symptomatic patient with right coronary artery to coronary sinus (RCA-CS) fistula, complicated by aneurysmal dilatation and thrombosis of the CS, causing severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR).

No abstract

Background The optimal venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) cannulation strategy in patients with postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock is still debatable. Studies evaluating the effect of cannulation strategy on long-term survival are scarce. Objectives We investigated the impact of central versus peripheral cannulation strategy for ECMO insertion on hospital outcomes and survival in postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock patients. Methods This retrospective study involved 101 patients who had either central or peripheral ECMO due to postcardiotomy shock between June 2009 and December 2020. Study endpoints were limb ischemia, bleeding, blood transfusion, wound infection, and overall survival. Results Eighty-four patients received central (c) ECMO, and 17 patients had peripheral (p) ECMO. In the group of pECMO, limb ischemia was significantly higher (5 [29.41%] vs 6 [7.14%]; p = .01). Other endpoints were similar in both groups. Thirty-day mortality was nonsignificantly different between both cohorts (cECMO 34 [41.67%] vs pECMO 10 [58.82%]; p = .29). However, overall survival was better with cECMO (Log-rank p = .02). Patients’ age [HR: 1.04 (95% CI: 1.02–1.06); p = .001], pECMO [HR: 1.98 (95% CI: 1.11–3.55), p = .002] and presence of infective endocarditis [HR: 3.54 (95% CI: 1.52–8.24), p = .03] were significant predictors of overall mortality. Conclusions Peripheral ECMO was associated with an increased risk of limb ischemia; however, bleeding, blood transfusion, infection, and 30-day mortality were comparable to central ECMO. Central cannulation was associated with a better 1-year survival rate. Therefore, central cannulation might be the preferred strategy for patients with postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock.

The COVID-19 pandemic represents an international health crisis that is challenging to all governments. Health practitioners in different fields have a duty to guide people and governments to achieve safe health practices. The Saudi Society for Cardiac Surgeons recognizes that it is difficult to establish evidence-based guidelines for safe cardiac surgery practices in such a crisis because this is an unprecedented health pandemic. So we decided to work with our colleagues in other societies by reviewing different recommendations and safe practices issued by different health organizations and scientific societies. The aim was to come up with recommendations that could guide hospitals, physicians, and other members of the healthcare team on the best available practices that are applicable to our community and that will not only ensure optimum patient care delivery but also protect healthcare workers from the risk of infection and aid the national effort in containing and managing this worldwide pandemic.

We aimed to compare the outcomes of ECMO with and without IABP for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. The study included 103 patients who needed ECMO for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. Patients were grouped according to the use of IABP into ECMO without IABP ( n = 43) and ECMO with IABP ( n = 60). The study endpoints were hospital complications, successful weaning, and survival. Patients with IABP had lower preoperative ejection fraction ( p = 0.002). There was no difference in stroke ( p = 0.97), limb ischemic ( p = 0.32), and duration of ICU stay ( p = 0.11) between groups. Successful weaning was non-significantly higher with IABP (36 (60%) vs 19 (44.19%); p = 0.11). Predictors of successful weaning were inversely related to the high pre-ECMO lactate levels (OR: 0.89; p = 0.01), active endocarditis (OR: 0.06; p = 0.02), older age (OR: 0.95; p = 0.02), and aortic valve replacement (OR: 0.26; p = 0.04). There was no difference in survival between groups ( p = 0.80). Our study did not support the routine use of IABP during ECMO support.

No abstract

No abstract