The objectives of this study were to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of a new impedance cardiograph device, the Physio Flow, at rest and during a steady-state dynamic leg exercise (work intensity ranging from 10 to 50 W) performed in the supine position. We compared cardiac output determined simultaneously by two methods, the Physio Flow (QcPF) and the direct Fick (QcFick) methods. Forty patients referred for right cardiac catheterisation, 14 with sleep apnoea syndrome and 26 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, took part in this study. The subjects' oxygen consumption values ranged from 0.14 to 1.19 l x min(-1). The mean difference between the two methods (QcFick - QcPF) was 0.04 l x min(-1) at rest and 0.29 l x min(-1) during exercise. The limits of agreement, defined as mean difference +/- 2SD, were -1.34, +1.41 l x min(-1)] at rest and -2.34, +2.92 l x min(-1) during exercise. The difference between the two methods exceeded 20% in only 2.5% of the cases at rest, and 9.3% of the cases during exercise. Thoracic hyperinflation did not alter QcPF. We conclude that the Physio Flow provides a clinically acceptable and non-invasive evaluation of cardiac output under these conditions. This new impedance cardiograph device deserves further study using other populations and situations.

No abstract

The prognostic value and the evolution of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with markedly hypoxemic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), treated or not with long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT), has been extensively investigated. However, little is known in patients with mildly or moderately hypoxemic COPD not requiring LTOT. Therefore, we assessed the evolution of pulmonary hemodynamics in 131 patients with stable COPD by performing two right heart catheterizations at a mean (+/- SD) time interval of 6.8 +/- 2.9 yr. At inclusion (T0), no patient had PH (i.e., the mean pulmonary artery pressure [Ppa] at rest was < 20 mm Hg). Group 1 included 55 patients without exercising PH and group 2 included 76 patients with exercising PH, defined by a pulmonary arterial pressure (Ppa) > 30 mm Hg during a steady-state 40-W exercise. Group 2 patients compared with group 1 patients had a significantly higher resting Ppa (16 +/- 3 mm Hg versus 14 +/- 2 mm Hg, p = 0.001). At the second catheterization, 33 (25%) patients (9 of 55 in group 1, 24 of 76 in group 2, p = 0.048) showed a resting Ppa > 20 mm Hg, but PH was generally mild, ranging from 20 to 42.5 mm Hg. The mean Ppa at second evaluation was 16 +/- 5 mm Hg in group 1 and 19 +/- 7 mm Hg in group 2 (p = 0.01). The patients who developed resting PH at the second catheterization (T1) had higher resting and exercising Ppa (p = 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively), and significantly lower resting and exercising Pa(O(2)) (p = 0.005 and p = 0.012, respectively) at T0. Logistic regression analysis showed that resting and exercising Ppa were independent predictors (at T0) for the subsequent development of PH (p = 0.029 and p = 0.027, respectively). The patients who developed resting PH (T1) had a significantly worsening of Pa(O(2)) (from 63.5 mm Hg at T0 to 60 mm Hg at T1, p = 0.047), whereas the Pa(O(2)) as a mean was stable in the remainder (69.5 mm Hg at T0 and T1). These results show the following. The progression of Ppa over time in patients with COPD with mild to moderate hypoxemia is rather slow, the average change for the group as a whole being of + 0.4 mm Hg/yr. Only about 25% of patients with COPD with mild to moderate hypoxemia and without resting PH at the onset will develop PH during a 6-yr follow-up. The patients with exercising PH at the onset have a significantly increased risk of developing PH over time. Only resting and exercising Ppa at the onset are independently related to the subsequent development of PH. However, in individual cases, the models of linear or logistic regression do not allow a pertinent prediction of the level of Ppa or the presence of PH at the second right heart catheterization.

One of the greatest challenges in exercise physiology is to develop a valid, reliable, non-invasive and affordable measurement of cardiac output (CO). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility and accuracy of a new impedance cardiograph device, the Physio Flow, during a 1-min step incremental exercise test from rest to maximal peak effort. A group of 12 subjects was evaluated to determine the reproducibility of the method as follows: (1) each subject performed two comparable tests while their CO was measured by impedance cardiography using the new device (COImp1, COImp2), and (2) in a subgroup of 7 subjects CO was also determined by the direct Fick method (COFick) during the second test. The mean difference between the values obtained by impedance (i.e. COImp1-COImp2) was -0.009 l.min-1 (95% confidence interval: -4.2 l.min-1, 4.2 l.min-1), and CO ranged from 3.55 l.min-1 to 26.75 l.min-1 (n = 146). When expressed as a percentage, the difference (COImp1-COImp2) did not vary with increasing CO. The correlation coefficient between the values of COImp and COFick obtained during the second exercise test was r = 0.94 (P < 0.01, n = 50). The mean difference expressed as percentage was -2.78% (95% confidence interval: -27.44%, 21.78%). We conclude that COImp provides a clinically acceptable evaluation of CO in healthy subjects during an incremental exercise.

Pulmonary hemodynamics have been extensively investigated in patients with chronic bronchitis or in ‘mixed’ patients (chronic bronchitis + emphysema) but rarely in patients with markedly predominant emphysema. We have investigated a large series (n = 151) of such patients, emphysema having been assessed on radiological, clinical and functional grounds. The mean age was 58 ± 10 years; vital capacity (VC, % of predicted) = 81 ± 19; forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)= 1,198 ± 589 ml; FEV₁/VC = 38 ± 12%; PaO₂ = 72 ± 11 mm Hg; PaCO₂ = 37,5 mm Hg. Pulmonary hypertension (PH), defined by a resting pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) of ≥20 mm Hg, was present in only 31 of 151 patients. During steady-state exercise (40 W or less) an abnormally high PAP (≥30 mm Hg) was observed in 99 of 151 patients. Resting and exercising PAP were poorly correlated with resting PaO₂ and PaCO₂, but were better correlated with the amplitude of the respiratory pressure swings, FEV₁, the transfer factor and exercising PaO₂. Patients with PH (n = 31) showed significantly more obstruction and pulmonary distension than the remainder, but they did not differ from the non-PH patients with regard to resting PaO₂. It is concluded that: (1) resting PH is not the rule in diffuse emphysema but exercising hypertension is frequent (2 of 3 patients), and (2) hypoxemia is not a determining factor of hemodynamic abnormalities in emphysema