RESUMO O objetivo do trabalho foi avaliar a operação e manutenção de um sistema de esgotamento sanitário centralizado, composto de três subsistemas, que atende 367 mil habitantes no Nordeste do Brasil. A avaliação do ciclo de vida considerou um inventário amplo de operação e manutenção do sistema de esgotamento sanitário com as redes de coleta, estações de tratamento de esgoto, disposição do esgoto tratado no corpo hídrico e gestão do lodo. O arranjo tecnológico das estações de tratamento de esgoto avaliadas incluiu o reator do tipo upflow anaerobic sludge blanket, seguido de lagoa aerada e lagoa de polimento em um subsistema, e upflow anaerobic sludge blanket seguido de reator de lodo ativado por aeração prolongada em dois subsistemas. O desempenho energético utilizou o método de demanda de energia acumulada e a pegada de carbono empregou o método de potencial de aquecimento global de 100 anos do Painel Intergovernamental sobre Mudanças Climáticas. O sistema de esgotamento sanitário avaliado demandou 5,12 MJ·m−3 e emitiu 4,08 kg CO2eq·m−3. As maiores contribuições do sistema de esgotamento sanitário avaliado foram a eletricidade, com 62% da demanda energética, e as emissões diretas para o ar, com 94% da pegada de carbono, sendo as emissões dos reatores upflow anaerobic sludge blanket com 76% da pegada de carbono. A identificação dos aspectos e impactos ambientais do sistema de esgotamento sanitário avaliado apoia a inovação tecnológica e gerencial para otimizar o desempenho energético e mitigar as emissões de gases de efeito estufa.
Masonry wall is a key construction subsystem, but it embodies significant environmental and energy burdens within the life cycle of buildings. Soil-cement bricks and blocks stand as an alternative low-cost masonry material, but despite the widespread claim to be environmentally friendly, more systematic investigation is lacking. This study aimed to assess the life cycle environmental and energy performance of 1.0 m2 of a soil-cement brick masonry wall from cradle-to-construction in terms of carbon, energy, and water footprints, and fossil and mineral resource use, as well as compare it with conventional technologies such as ceramic and concrete block masonries in Brazil. Results showed that raw materials are a major contribution to soil cement masonry walls, followed by the joints and links with columns, in which cement stands out among other inputs. Hydraulic pressing in brick production had a negligible burden increase compared with manual pressing. The PVA mortar joint outperformed the PVA glue one, whereas resin coating performed better than cement mortar. In comparison with ceramic and concrete masonry walls, the soil cement masonry presented overall better environmental and energy performance and was the least affected by the inclusion of finishing coating layers and transport of materials in the sensitivity analysis scenarios, although improved scenarios of conventional options could be competitive, e.g., ceramic masonry with blocks produced by firing reforested wood for the carbon footprint. Scale-up analysis revealed that widespread deployment of soil cement masonry in the built environment would substantially avoid environmental and energy burdens compared with conventional technologies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.