Current findings indicate that primary chemotherapy can be safely administered in women with large tumors (>5.0 cm) and can allow breast-sparing surgery in a high fraction of patients (62%). However, to assess effectively the worthiness of this approach on long-term results, properlyconceived large randomized studies with newer and more effective drug regimens are warranted.

Background: Tumor shrinkage is a common end point used in screening new cytotoxic agents. The standard World Health Organization criterion for partial response is a 50% or more decrease in the sum of the products of two measurements (the maximum diameter of a tumor and the largest diameter perpendicular to this maximum diameter) of individual tumors. However, theoretically, the simple sum of the maximum diameters of individual tumors is more linearly related to cell kill than is the sum of the bidimensional products. It has been hypothesized that the calculation of bidimensional products is unnecessary, and a 30% decrease in the sum of maximum diameters of individual tumors (assuming spherical shape and equivalence to a 50% reduction in the sum of the bidimensional products) was proposed as a new criterion. We have applied the standard response and the new response criteria to the same data to determine whether the same number of responses in the same patients would result. Methods: Data from 569 patients included in eight studies of a variety of cancers were reanalyzed. The two response criteria were separately applied, and the results were compared using the statistic. The importance of confirmatory measurements and the frequency of nonspherical tumors were also examined. In addition, for a subset of 128 patients, a unidimensional criterion for disease progression (30% increase in the sum of maximum diameters) was applied and compared with the standard definition of a 25% increase in the sum of the bidimensional products. Results: Agreement between the unidimensional and bidimensional criteria was generally found to be good. The statistic for concordance for overall response was 0.95. Conclusion: We conclude that one dimensional measurement of tumor maximum diameter may be sufficient

By comparison with adult cases, childhood melanoma can have a higher percentage of atypical clinical features (amelanotic and raised lesions), nodular histotype, and thick lesions. Although we have no data to support any suggestion of biological differences between young children and adolescents or adults, our findings give the impression that melanoma behaves differently in the younger age group.

These gratifying improvements in survival can often be plausibly related to advances in treatment. The prevalence of European adults with a history of childhood cancer will inevitably increase.

RCC is a rare disease in children and adolescents. This neoplasm has a different clinical presentation in children compared with adults but the same outcome. In our experience, patients with localized disease could be cured by nephrectomy alone. Prospective studies in a larger number of patients are needed to confirm radiation therapy and biologic response modifiers as effective adjunct therapy in RCC stage III. The alternative therapy seems warranted in patients with advanced disease.

The identification of prognostic variables should enable risk-adapted therapies to be planned. Patients with initially unresectable disease and patients with resected large and high-grade tumors are at high risk of metastases and treatment failure. Although the limits of this retrospective analysis are self-evident, our data would suggest that intensive chemotherapy (with an ifosfamide-doxorubicin regimen) might have a more significant role in these patients than what is generally assumed.

HART after intensive postoperative chemotherapy, followed by myeloablative chemotherapy in selected cases, proved feasible in children with metastatic medulloblastoma. The results of our treatment compare favorably with other series treated using conventional therapies.

This report assesses the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric cancer patients over an 8-week period elapsing from the day of the Italian outbreak (February 20, 2020) to the time of writing (April 15, 2020) in Lombardia region, the epicenter of the pandemic in Italy and one of the worst-hit areas in Europe. During the 8-week period, 155 467 confirmed COVID-19 diagnoses and 19 508 deaths due to the virus were reported in Italy, while Lombardia registered 63 098 positive cases (40% of all Italians affected) and 11 384 deaths. Lombardia is the central region of northern Italy, covering an area of 23 863 km 2 with a population of 10 million (population density 421.6/km 2 ). The region has six pediatric onco-hematology centers.Cancer incidence in the region's population aged 0-18 years is approximately 19/100 000, with 320 new cases expected to occur each year. 1In addition, 40-50% additional patients come from other Italian regions